The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
122 THE LOCOMOTIVE. [August,<br />
requires a much higher engine speed than the paddle wheel, but at first it was not con-<br />
sidered practicable to drive the screw shaft from the engine direct, so that the higher<br />
speed necessary was secured by gearing. Even during the Civil War a great many of<br />
the vessels which took part used paddle wheels. Most of them built during that period<br />
were propellers, and this has been the practice in the Navy for ocean navigation ever<br />
since.<br />
In reviewing the literature of the early days of steam navigation, after ocean steam-<br />
ers had become fairly well established, it is very interesting to note the evident aim at<br />
greater economy in the use of fuel, and there was no lack of suggestion of methods for<br />
accomplishing this result. It is surprising to note, however, that what to us nowadays<br />
seems the obvious way of determining the value of these methods, namely, actual experi-<br />
ment, seemed to have little chance. <strong>The</strong> authors do not seem to have been able to<br />
refer to any attempt to secure greater economy by higher pressures and increased<br />
expansion, although this was a favorite subject of discussion. It is only fair to remem-<br />
ber, however, that metallurgical operations were by no means so well developed as in<br />
our day, and the workmanship on the machinery was also quite inferior. <strong>The</strong> difficulty<br />
of procuring thick boiler plates which would be thoroughly reliable offered an effectual<br />
bar to high steam pressures, and the inferior workmanship prevented high rotational<br />
speed, two features which, we now know very thoroughly, are necessary to give economy.<br />
With reference to the question of expansion, not only the early writers but those as<br />
late as 1860 believed that the only limit to expansion was the practical consideration of<br />
npt reducing the mean forward pressure so low that the back pressure would be too<br />
large a percentage of it, thereby requiring a very large engine. Most of them seem to<br />
have been entirely unaware of the effects of cylinder condensation in reducing the theo-<br />
retical benefit to be derived from expansion. <strong>The</strong>se older writers also seemed to have<br />
been familiar with the indicator mainly as an interesting scientific<br />
comparatively little use was made.<br />
instrument, of which<br />
<strong>The</strong> first reliable data with respect to the cost of power that I have been able to find<br />
are given in a work which at one time had considerable vogue, called "Engineering<br />
Precedents," by Chief Engineer Isherwood, of the U. S. Navy, published in 1858. In<br />
1863 we come to the first volume of his " Experimental Researches." <strong>The</strong>se include<br />
records of the performance of a class of naval screw steamers built about 1854 to 1856.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Merrimac was one of them. <strong>The</strong>se vessels were about four thousand six hundred<br />
tons displacement, three hundred feet long, fifty feet beam, and twenty-one feet draft.<br />
<strong>The</strong> engines were of about thirteen hundred horse power working with a steam pressure<br />
of thirteen and one-half pounds above the atmosphere, and making about forty-five rev-<br />
olutions per minute. A record of the maximum performance in smooth water showed a<br />
coal consumption of 4.37 pounds of coal per horse power hour. Under ordinary steam-<br />
ing conditions at sea, when a certain amount of heat was lost due to " blowing off" to<br />
reduce the density of the water in the boilers, as the condensers were of the jet variety<br />
and using anthracite coal with eighteen per cent, refuse, the coal consumption was six<br />
pounds per horse power hour.<br />
This same work contains the record in extenso of the famous Michigan experiments,<br />
conducted by a board of naval engineers, of which Isherwood was president, on the<br />
economy of using steam with different degrees of expansion. <strong>The</strong> Michigan was built<br />
in 1854, so that the machinery was of an older type than that of the frigates just dis-<br />
cussed. It is, however, very well designed for the period in which it was built, and it<br />
is in use today, the only change being in the boilers, which have been renewed twice in<br />
the fifty-seven years since the vessel was commissioned. <strong>The</strong> first renewal occurred in