The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
The Locomotive - Lighthouse Survival Blog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1901.] THE LOCOMOTIVE. 59<br />
gas would behave; but so do numerous other gases. <strong>The</strong> question arises, therefore, why<br />
we should prefer air to hydrogen, or nitrogen, or any other gas which shows a similarly<br />
close approach to the state of a perfect gas. Let us see how much difference would be<br />
introduced if we should apply Tyndall's argument to some of them.<br />
Beginning with air itself, let us note that the recent accurate measurements of<br />
Chappuis show that the fraction for air, which we have taken above as 1/460, ought<br />
really to be 1/458; so that if we accept his measurements, we should conclude, from air,<br />
that the absolute zero is 458° below the ordinary Fahrenheit zero. Chappuis found<br />
1/450 as the corresponding fraction for hydrogen, and 1/453 for carbonic acid gas; so<br />
that from these two gases, respectively, we should conclude that the absolute zero is<br />
459° and 453° below the Fahrenheit zero. <strong>The</strong>se differences cannot be attributed to<br />
errors in the experimental data, for Chappuis worked with the greatest care; and moreover<br />
it has been known, for a long time, that small differences of this order of magni-<br />
tude do really exist among the various " permanent " gases. <strong>The</strong> differences referred<br />
to, therefore, prove one of two things. Either there is no such thing as a real, absolute<br />
zero, or else the method that we have been using in this paper to determine it is not<br />
strictly correct. Some will doubtless take the former position; but this would be an<br />
error. <strong>The</strong> trouble is, that we have sacrificed accuracy to simplicity of treatment, just<br />
as all other writers of popular articles and books on this subject do.<br />
We can reconcile the data given by different nearly-perfect gasses, in the way<br />
pointed out by Rankine. (See his paper, entitled On the Al>soht.fe Zero of the Perfect Gas<br />
<strong>The</strong>rmometer, in his ''Miscellaneous Scientific Papers," page 307.) Rankine takes the<br />
position that the actual gases of nature differ from the ideal perfect gas, for the sole<br />
reason that their molecules are near enough together to exert a sensible amount of<br />
attraction upon one another ; and he points out that we can approach as nearly as we<br />
please to the ideal condition of a perfect gas by working with gases at small densities.<br />
In a rarefied gas the molecules are (on the whole) so much further apart that their attrac-<br />
tive action on one another may be quite negligible, so that the gas, in its rarefied state,<br />
would be indistinguishable from a perfect gas. <strong>The</strong> behavior of a perfect gas may<br />
therefore be taken to be the same as the behavior of any of the so-called permanent<br />
gases, when the said permanent gas is taken in a sufficiently rarefied state. Practically,<br />
it is difficult to experiment with a highly rarefied gas, and so we have to carry out the<br />
idea that Rankine suggests in something like the following manner: We first experiment<br />
witli the gas in its ordinary state, and we then calculate, just as Tyndall does, the posi-<br />
tion of the absolute zero. Next, we experiment with the same gas after reducing its<br />
density to (say) one-half what it was at first, and again calculate the position of the<br />
absolute zero. This process is repeated as many times as we find it convenient to do so,<br />
and then we compare the various estimates that have been so obtained of the position of<br />
the absolute zero. As the gas grows rarer and rarer, the estimated position of the absolute<br />
zero may be expected to approximate nearer and nearer to the true position, as it would be<br />
found if we could work with an ideally perfect gas. We regret that we have no data<br />
at hand more recent than those of Regnault for carrying out the calculation thus described.<br />
Using his data, however, the results are interesting and instructive, even if they are not<br />
as accurate as might be wished. He found that carbonic acid gas, of such a density<br />
that it has a pressure of 0.9980 of an atmosphere at 32° Fahr., gives — 450.4° as the posi-<br />
tion of the absolute zero; and that the same gas, when of such a density that it<br />
has a pressure of 4.7225 atmospheres at 32° Fahr., gives — 434.4° as the position<br />
of the absolute zero. Two other experiments were also made with carbonic acid<br />
gas at the initial pressures 1.1857 and 2.2931 atmospheres, respectively, the resulting