17.06.2013 Views

I Fiance Apicultural

I Fiance Apicultural

I Fiance Apicultural

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

96<br />

They also suggest that raising deposit rates rather than improving<br />

density, accessibility, and other characteristics of RFIs should be accorded<br />

tile highest priority in agricultural credit policy (Agabin 1987;<br />

Mooy 1974; Republic of Philippines 1979; and I Initecd Nations Secretariat<br />

1980).<br />

There are, howCrr,seveI ecoionictric studies with 16 cases from<br />

which the relative importance of various price and nouprice factors that<br />

influenc,- sulpply of rural deposits can be identificd. These studies are on<br />

eight diverse countrics--lBaigladclsli, India, Kenya, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri<br />

Lanka, Taiwai, and the IhIited States. All of the studies except Penson<br />

(1972) use the singlc-eqlation oldinaiy least squarCs technique of estimation.<br />

Plensoti uses the two-stage least squares (2SL-S) technique to take<br />

into account the simultaneity in the system of struictuiral equations.<br />

Sonic of the independent variables in these studies are the same as those<br />

in the studies on rural loaii demand: accessibility to RFls, ability to save<br />

or"borrow, and incentives to save or borrow. Results of these stldies are<br />

reported iniTables 11t7.<br />

The specified models expla ina large proportion of variation in tile<br />

su)ply cf rural deposits. Most of tile regression coefficietits associated<br />

wilhithe real iliterest rate have the 'x)pcctdpositive sign, but only 8 out<br />

of 15 cases have a statistically sigiificalnt cofficicit. A large lmijolrity of'<br />

coeflicieits rel;itcdt to l rt( [;Ii(l factols have expected signs and<br />

ale statistically significanit.<br />

These sludies also show that hc Etctors Ielatcd to the noioiitcrest<br />

ratc ale IIiO1C itili)llt tll ille interest iate. 32 "l'lies,.tactots, howevetr,<br />

differ between l.lCs aid MICs, oln dt one Ianld. :uid HICs, on the other,<br />

even though the percentage of valiatioti explained by Ihe models is the<br />

same across these countries. itn lICs miid MICs, these are, iti ordcr of<br />

iIIportaIice, accessibility to deposit facilities and availability of notidcposit<br />

services such aF loans aiil marketing services, ability to save, and<br />

interactions of these two. In I IICs, tile corres)onling factors are rate of<br />

return (real) on comiipeting f

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!