I Fiance Apicultural
I Fiance Apicultural
I Fiance Apicultural
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
71<br />
iuzividual farmers at the district or local level. The finctions of such a<br />
society are to extend credit, marketing, farin input supplies, farl extension<br />
services, processing, water nianagenent, occupation pronotion,<br />
and funeral services to its neellirs.<br />
During 1973-79, the nunber of prilaiy cooperatives varied fron<br />
555 to 823 and their nenbership froiii 324,013 to 685,191. By 1979,<br />
although these socicties served only 15 percent of the total farin population,<br />
they were considered the best-organized farm institution. lIn 197,4<br />
and 1975, the ntiniber of cooperatives declined becatisc of anlalganlatiotis.<br />
I'le mlhin sources (-.f loanable lrsoiices of thlese cooperatives are<br />
share capital, reserve fiends, holrrowimigs, and deposits.<br />
These cooperatives wetsc viable fion 1973 to 1978 (Table 29). Their<br />
average total costs (transaction plus financial) incrcased until 1975 and<br />
thereafter declined steadily through 1978. Theii unit ievenue f[otn all<br />
activities showed siitnilar behavior. (,nseqicnitly, theil unit net llrgin<br />
first iniiproved and then deterio-ated, although it did not turn ncgative<br />
in any of the six years tiider study. In tlrce olit of tie six years, these<br />
societies etijoyed scale ecolnolics in their aggregate costs and itl sonic<br />
years they had neither scale ecolotnics nor disecotionlies. Itl other<br />
words, tie increase ill thi,(r costs was irol-lotioiit c to the itrease in<br />
their value of oluerations. Taking all six of' the years together, these<br />
societies realized constalnt r1etuis to scale l(('able 30), bill both their<br />
viability .lud rea;liZationi of scale ecoiioilics could be iniproved if their<br />
fiiiaicial constIraints could w alleviated, Inailaglinct itnproved, and<br />
extension services expallded bv forling lii own f'(1r1-l inaicing<br />
agency at the pI ovin('ial Ivel.<br />
Agricultural Credit Cooperatives, Thailand<br />
Agricultural credit coo 1 uentives of I' hailan :I( essciially I lliaiy-level<br />
crelit cooper atives, altlougli they do undertake soine noticirdit operations<br />
such as ftii input supplies aild extension (Thailand, Ministry of<br />
Table 2 9 -- Aggregate costs, aggregate revenue, and net margin<br />
of all agricultural cooperatives, Thailand, 1973-78<br />
Variable in Real "eb'ms Meani 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978<br />
Unit aggregalr cos.<br />
(pCri ( lt)<br />
(adininilraii'e plus i..i5 9.68 16.57 18.30 15.98 1I13. 12.50<br />
fiancial c(sis)<br />
Unit aggregate :renulrv<br />
3<br />
15.43 i 18.64 19. 11 17.0.1 15.25 13.10<br />
Unit ne iargin<br />
Marginal aggregaie costs"<br />
0.98<br />
9.83<br />
t .61<br />
;7.27<br />
2.07<br />
33.17<br />
0.81<br />
18.30<br />
1.06<br />
7.19<br />
0.91<br />
.1.73<br />
0.61<br />
10.50<br />
Source: T1aailand, Ministry of Agri uili and Cooperatives, Cooper, fives Pronioion<br />
Departieni 1979.<br />
Note: Real teimts aie derived by ;lptlling ie agricultural ()' deflator with a base<br />
year of 1972/73.<br />
lhiese variables are coillliiu d as a pelceittage of toarblite resoultes plus assets,