I Fiance Apicultural

More documents

Recommendations

Info

154 Naseem, M. 1975. Credit availability and the growth of small farms in the Pakistan Punjab. FoodResearch InstituteStudies 14 (1): 65-80. Nehnian, G.1. 1973. Small farmers credit use in a depressed community of Sio Paulo, Brazil. Ph.D. diss., Ohio State University, Coh,mbus, Ohio, U.S.A. Nelson, B. N. 1969. The idea of usuy from tribalbrotherhood to univelsal brotherhood.Chicago: University of Chicago Press. NENARCA (Near East and North Af-ica Regional Agricultural Credit Association). 1987. Report on the conference on repayment of agricultural loans, 18-21 October. Mimeo. Nicholson, F. A. 1960. Report regarding possibility of introducing land and agricultural banks into Madras Presidency 1875. Bombay. Nicholson, N. K. 198t. L.andholding, agricultural modernization, and local institutions in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change 32 (3): 569-592. Nieclerstucke, K. 11. 197.1. A socioeconomic evaluation of the smallholder credit scheme, Kericho, Kenya. Nisbet, C. T.1969. "le relationship between formal and informal credit nmarkets in rural Chile. Lanl ltconomnics '15 (2): 162-173. ___ .1971. Moncylcnding in rural areas of Latin America. American Journalof Economics and Sociology 30 (1): 7 1-81. Noda, T. 1970. Savings of farmihouseholds. In Agiculture and economic growth:Japan'sexperience, cd. K. Olhkawa, B. F. Johnston, and 1-1. Kaneda. Princeton, N.J., U.S.A. and Tokyo, Japan: Princeton University Press and UJniversity of Tokyo Press. Norinclukin Bank. 1985. Rural credit injapan. Tokyo. Nyanin, 0. 0. 1969. Credit and small farmers in South Korea, 1968-70. M.S. thesis, Ohio State L niversity, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A. __ _ .1982. Costs of agricultural lending, institutional viability, and lender behavior in Jamaica. Ph.D. diss. Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.: Ohio State University. Obibuaku, L. 0., and G. 1). I lursl . 197,4. Farm practice adoption in the eastern states of Nigeria. Agriciltural Administation 1 (2): 115 123. Ohio State University. 1987. Rural finance in Niger: A critical appraisal and recommendations for change. Final report. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U .S.A. Olin, M. 1975. The distribution of agricultural credit in Latin America. Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Mimeo.
155 Olu, W. 1985. Formal credit and default problems in II.D-Programmes in Sier'a Leone. Hiamburg, Germany: Studien zur Integrierten ILindlichen Entwicklung, Verlag Weltarchiv. Oluwasanmi, Fl. A., and J. A. Alao. 1965. The role of credit in the transformation of traditional agriculture: The Western Nigerian experience. The NigerianJournalof Economics and Social Studies 7 (1): 31-50. Onchon, T. 1982. Credit problems of farmers in Thailand. Paper prepared for the symposium on farm credit organ;zed by the Asian Productivity Center, Manila. - 1988. Farm credit policies in Asian countries. In Fannfinance and agriculturaldevelopmtent, 3,13-354. Tokyo: Agricultural Productivity Organization. Ong, M. M. L. 1972. Changes in farni-level savings and consuimption in Taiwan, 1960-1970. Ph.D. diss., Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A. Ong, M. M. L., D. W. Adams, and I. J. Singh. 1976. Voluntary rural savings capacities in Taiwan, 1960-1970. AmericanJournalof AgriculturalEconomics 58 (3): 578-582. Osuntogun, A. 1980. --arnm level credit use among cooperative farmers in Nigeria. In Bonowers and lenders: Ruralfinancial markets and institutionsin developingcountries,ed.J. Howell. ILondon: Overseas Development Institute. Padki, M. B., and G. S. Gajarajan. 1978. Some basic conflicts in rural credit: With special reference to fariers' service cooperative societies. IndianJournalof AgriculturalEconomics 33 (4): 84-91. Padmanabhan, K. P. 1988. Ruralcredit: Lessonsfor nralbankeis andpolicy makers. London: Intermediate Technology Publications. Pakistan, Government of. 197,1. Rfport on the nrralcredit survey. Lahore: Agricultural Census Organization. Pani, P. K. 1966. Cultivator's deimamnd for crtdit: A cross-section analysis. InternationalEconomic Review 7 (2): 176-203. Paoiker, P. G. K. 1970. Ruralsaving in India. Bombay: Somaiya Publications. Parks, L. L., and R. L. Tinnermvnier. 1981. Agricultural credit for farmer groups: Expcrinients in Honduras. CERCA. Pathak, S. M., and T. Shukla. 1 9 87a. Performance of the organized rural financial markets in agricultural sector: Some issues. Prajnan 16 (4): 491-513. .1987b. Regional variations in flow of finds and functioning of rural financial market. Prajnan 16 (4): 477-489.
Page 1 and 2:
,AFOOD POLICY EVIEWl Institutional
Page 3 and 4:
FOOD POLICY REVIEW 1 Institutional
Page 5 and 6:
Chapter One Chapter Two Chapter Thr
Page 7 and 8:
15. Unit transaction costs, unit ir
Page 9 and 10:
47. Relative importance of intcecst
Page 11 and 12:
Foreword Thiis report introduces a
Page 13 and 14:
1 Summary This study analyzes two a
Page 15 and 16:
3 Six organizational principles for
Page 17 and 18:
2 Introduction Finance and Economic
Page 19 and 20:
An obvious problem innate to an act
Page 21 and 22:
9 Selection of Theme and Issues for
Page 23 and 24:
I1 TIhe issue of scale economies is
Page 25 and 26:
13 There is also a problem of indiv
Page 27 and 28:
15 Figure I-Share of borrowing of f
Page 29 and 30:
17 Figure 2-Share of'agricultural l
Page 31 and 32:
19 specific or economywile developm
Page 33 and 34:
Table 1- Continued 21 Region, Count
Page 35 and 36:
Table 2-Continued Government Nation
Page 37 and 38:
25 regional without higher or lower
Page 39 and 40:
27 Caribbean, compared with Asia. T
Page 41 and 42:
Table 3 -Continued Proportion of Pe
Page 43 and 44:
31 LICs (including Bangladesh, Indi
Page 45 and 46:
33 Functional Structure of RFIs and
Page 47 and 48:
35 approximated from available lite
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 3-Stylized organizational fr
Page 51 and 52:
5 Transaction Costs, Profitability,
Page 53 and 54:
411 or fiom new borrowers. Moreover
Page 55 and 56:
43 Table 6-Unit transaction costs o
Page 57 and 58:
45 tiotis largely by borrowing fi'o
Page 59 and 60:
47 Table 9 -Transaction costs of br
Page 61 and 62:
49 'T7heSonali Bank's unit uct marg
Page 63 and 64:
Table 14-Estimated parameters of th
Page 65 and 66:
53 PACS) was established ill March
Page 67 and 68:
55 Table 16-Deposit growth rates of
Page 69 and 70:
57 rIIIIal Output (28 p)Celt) and o
Page 71 and 72:
59 Although APS loans were dominant
Page 73 and 74:
Table 2 0-Pattern of loans advanced
Page 75 and 76:
63 Table 2 1- Unit profit and unit
Page 77 and 78:
65 resources are mainly channeled t
Page 79 and 80:
67 Table 25-Various costs, gross ma
Page 81 and 82:
69 BAAC also en1joyced sc.;le ,~ol
Page 83 and 84:
71 iuzividual farmers at the distri
Page 85 and 86:
73 Agriculture and Cooperatives 197
Page 87 and 88:
75 like the county and plimaly coop
Page 89 and 90:
77 Table 33-Transaction and financi
Page 91 and 92:
79 Table 3 6 -Structure of assets a
Page 93 and 94:
Response of Rural Loan Demand to In
Page 95 and 96:
83 Table 3 9-Estimated multivariate
Page 97 and 98:
85 Table 40-Estimated multivariate
Page 99 and 100:
87 separate deteriminants of demand
Page 101 and 102:
Table 4 1-Continued Type of Demand,
Page 103 and 104:
Table 4 1-Confinued Type of Demand,
Page 105 and 106:
Table 4 2 -Evidence on interest ela
Page 107 and 108:
7 Response of Supply of Rural Depos
Page 109 and 110:
97 Table 44-Estimated multivariate
Page 111 and 112:
99 Table 4 6-Relative importance of
Page 113 and 114:
101 I1e positivc respolse of supply
Page 115 and 116: Table 48- Continued 103 eBased on t
Page 117 and 118: Table 4 9 -Pattern of total rural s
Page 119 and 120: 107 is substantial saving even in d
Page 121 and 122: 109 Table 52-Estimated multivariate
Page 123 and 124: 111 nient), and lastly, the inverse
Page 125 and 126: 113 Table 54-Positive and negative
Page 127 and 128: 9 Flow of Funds of the Rural Financ
Page 129 and 130: 117 interest I'evellie and payment.
Page 131 and 132: Table 5 5 -Continued 119 cin scenar
Page 133 and 134: 10 Conclusions and Implications ase
Page 135 and 136: 123 differential increase in demand
Page 137 and 138: 125 can be attained. Multifunctiona
Page 139 and 140: 127 fully achieved. Had the institu
Page 141 and 142: 129 so doing, improvements in verti
Page 143 and 144: The standard error of The standard
Page 145 and 146: Appendix 2 Reasons for Delinquency
Page 147 and 148: Region/Country 135 Reaso.z Near Eas
Page 149 and 150: References Abbott, J. C. 1 9 7 3a.
Page 151 and 152: 139 Aku, P. S. 1986. Lending to far
Page 153 and 154: 141 Caibbean Country Department II,
Page 155 and 156: 143 144. Princeton, N.J., U.S.A.: W
Page 157 and 158: 145 1975. Agriculturalcredit in Asi
Page 159 and 160: __ 147 Gurley, J. G., and E. S. Sha
Page 161 and 162: 149 G. Hunter and A. F. Bottrall, 5
Page 163 and 164: 151 Lee, T. Y., D. H. Kim, and D. W
Page 165: 153 __ _. 1976. The new economics o
Page 169 and 170: __ 157 Rao, B. P. 1970. The economi
Page 171 and 172: 159 Singh, G., and S. R. Asokan. 19
Page 173 and 174: -- 161 Verghese, S. K. 1983. tivfit
show all

I Fiance Apicultural

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?