I Fiance Apicultural
I Fiance Apicultural
I Fiance Apicultural
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5<br />
Transaction Costs,<br />
Profitability, Economies<br />
of Scale, and Their Effects<br />
on Development<br />
ransaction costs, defined later in this chapter, are largely under<br />
tie control of rural financial institutions. Subsequent chapters<br />
show that the level of interest rates influences the level of investmnert<br />
in rural development. Since transaction costs help determine<br />
interest rates, either directly through competitive market forces or<br />
through their influence on the administrative setting of lending rates, it<br />
is important to measure theim and to understand what determi lnes them.<br />
A substantial amount of recent literature argues that because transaction<br />
costs in low-income countries are high and rising, RFIs are generally<br />
not profitable, and they have contributed little or even negatively to<br />
agricultural development (Adams and Kato 1978; Alined and Adatns<br />
1987; Cuevas 1 9 87a; Von Pisclike, Adams, and Donald 1983). Analysis in<br />
this chapter is organized around the following information:<br />
" Importance of the issue of the transaction costs involved in lending<br />
to farmers vis-,¥vis all other activities of RFIs;<br />
* Definitions and concepts regarding these costs and their relation<br />
to the viability of RFls;<br />
* Cross-national comparison of transaction costs on a comparable<br />
basis; and<br />
* Transaction costs of selected RFIs, scale relationships, and viability,<br />
and the developtmental accomplishments of RFIs in various<br />
countries.<br />
Importance of Considering<br />
Transaction Costs for All<br />
Activities of RFIs<br />
Some critics of past agricultural credit policy have exclusively dealt with<br />
the transaction costs involved when RFIs lend to farmers (Ahmed and<br />
Adams 1987; Cuevas 9 8 1 7<br />
a, 1987b; Ctievas and Graham 1984; Gadgil<br />
1986; Gheen 1976; Meyer and Srinivasan 1987; Meyer, Baker, and<br />
Onchon 1979; Nyanin 1982; Saito and Villanueva 1981; Srinivasan and<br />
Meyer 1986). There are severe limitations to this approach.<br />
39