29.06.2013 Views

CAD/CAM/CAE : electronic design automation, 1992 - Archive Server

CAD/CAM/CAE : electronic design automation, 1992 - Archive Server

CAD/CAM/CAE : electronic design automation, 1992 - Archive Server

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CAD</strong>/<strong>CAM</strong>/<strong>CAE</strong>—Electronic Design Automation Applications<br />

Figure 1<br />

1991 North American HDL Market Segmentation<br />

Others<br />

(Nonproprietary)<br />

(9.3%) v^^,,^<br />

/ No Use \<br />

/ of HDL \<br />

I (22.9%) \<br />

Y"""'^ Proprietary /<br />

\ HDL /<br />

\ (15.7%) /<br />

VHDL \<br />

(24.3%) \<br />

Verilog g<br />

HDL M<br />

(27.8%) ^<br />

Notes:<br />

1. Segmentation de (ta are t>ased on<br />

end-user survey results.<br />

2. Segments reflect percentage of users.<br />

Source: Dataquest (April <strong>1992</strong>)<br />

Historical and projected market share figures<br />

published in April 1991 show worldwide<br />

figures, as opposed to a regional segmentation.<br />

At the worldwide level, our figures show that<br />

the market shares of Verilog HDL and VHDL<br />

were nearly equivalent This is based on our<br />

estimate that Verilog HDL and VHDL's Norfli<br />

American market shares were approximately<br />

equal, whereas in Japan, Verilog HDL held a<br />

significant edge; in Europe, a less exhaT:istive<br />

study indicated that VHDL held a significant<br />

advantage over Verilog HDL.<br />

North American Outlook<br />

Among the most significant issues facing EDA<br />

software vendors and ASIC suppliers is determining<br />

how the HDL landscape will shift over<br />

the next three years. Dataquesf s most recent<br />

studies shed light on the subject. Figure 3 shows<br />

the projected market share of the various HDLs<br />

in North America. The chart was generated by<br />

Figure 2<br />

1991 Japanese HDL Market Segmentation<br />

UDUI<br />

(0.2%)<br />

Others<br />

(Nonproprietary)<br />

(6.2%)<br />

Notes:<br />

1. Segmentation data are based on<br />

end-user survey results.<br />

2. Segments reflect percentage of users.<br />

oanoeia Source: Dataquest (April <strong>1992</strong>) G2000619<br />

surveying <strong>electronic</strong> <strong>design</strong> groups at over<br />

250 different sites throu^out North America.<br />

Engineers and managers were aslffid which HDL<br />

they planned to use for their next-generation<br />

<strong>design</strong>. The results show that an overwhelming<br />

percentage plan to adopt VHDL.<br />

Despite the strong response fevoring VHDL, it<br />

is important to recognize that VHDL-based tools<br />

will realize their market share potential only if<br />

they fill fin the market's performance requirements,<br />

The data in Figure 3 is simply a reflection<br />

of the market's current thinking. Our<br />

assumption underlying the data is that VHDL's<br />

performance problems vriU be resolved and that<br />

the ASIC libraries will be available for VHDL<br />

tools. Most EDA vendors maintain that VHDLbased<br />

tools will deliver the necessary performance<br />

requirements, but users still complain<br />

about VtS^L's slow simulation speed and excessive<br />

memory requirements. We believe that these<br />

performance issues will be resolved, given the<br />

CW\M-EDA-DP-9201 ©<strong>1992</strong> Dabquest Incoiporaled April 27, <strong>1992</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!