29.06.2013 Views

CAD/CAM/CAE : electronic design automation, 1992 - Archive Server

CAD/CAM/CAE : electronic design automation, 1992 - Archive Server

CAD/CAM/CAE : electronic design automation, 1992 - Archive Server

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Other advantages of top-down <strong>design</strong> tools<br />

include an enhanced ability to perform trade-offs<br />

in the areas of architectural <strong>design</strong>, chip size,<br />

and circuit speed. In the absence of HDL-based<br />

logic synthesis and supporting technologies,<br />

engineers face the prospect of performing a significantly<br />

greater nvunber of <strong>design</strong> iterations to<br />

hone in on an optimal solution.<br />

Migration from one chip technology to another,<br />

commonly referred to as <strong>design</strong> remapping, is<br />

yet another benefit of the technology. Examples<br />

of remapping include the migration from one<br />

process technology to another, such as remapping<br />

a 1.2 micron CMOS <strong>design</strong> to 0.8 micron<br />

CMOS implementation, and architectural<br />

migration, such as remapping a field-programmable<br />

gate array (FPGA) <strong>design</strong> to a maskprogrammable<br />

gate array or cell-based IC.<br />

Reusability: Exploiting tlie Power of<br />

Top-Down Design<br />

Dataquesf s research shows that <strong>electronic</strong>s manufacturers<br />

in both the United States and Japan<br />

are aiming to reduce product <strong>design</strong> cycles by<br />

20 to 30 percent between the current generation<br />

and the next generation of <strong>electronic</strong> <strong>design</strong>s.<br />

Reducing cycle time by this amount would not<br />

be so daunting if the demands being placed on<br />

<strong>design</strong> teams were not expanding so rapidly. For<br />

instance, when asked to rank the three most<br />

important fectors influencing a product's ability<br />

to achieve market success, manufacturers cite<br />

reducing time-to-market first, followed by<br />

increasing functionality, and reducing costs.<br />

Reconciling these three competing objectives<br />

falls directiy upon the shoulders of the <strong>design</strong><br />

teams.<br />

Given that the goal is reducing <strong>design</strong> time and<br />

costs while significantly increasing fiinctionality,<br />

it is vmrealistic to believe that simply improving<br />

engineering talent and <strong>automation</strong> will be<br />

enough to reduce product <strong>design</strong> time by 20 to<br />

30 percent. Dataquesf believes that manufacturers<br />

must also create a technology infrastructure<br />

that supports large-scale reuse of existing<br />

<strong>design</strong>s. Providing such technology is a clear<br />

opportunity for EDA vendors. Today, 34 percent<br />

of the <strong>electronic</strong>s irom an average dectronic<br />

product (built by North American <strong>electronic</strong>s<br />

manufacturers) is circviitry that has been reused<br />

from an existing product. In Japan, the figure is<br />

slightly higher, 37 percent. In our view, this level<br />

<strong>CAD</strong>/<strong>CAM</strong>/<strong>CAE</strong>—Electronic Design Automation Applications<br />

of reuse will not be enough to remain competitive.<br />

Dataquesf believes that simultaneously<br />

increasing product functionality, reducing cost,<br />

and reducing <strong>design</strong> time (by 20 to 30 percent)<br />

wiU require <strong>electronic</strong>s maniifacturers to <strong>design</strong><br />

products comprising 45 to 55 percent of reused<br />

circuitry (see Figure 1).<br />

Integral to the reuse <strong>design</strong> methodology will be<br />

the creation of logic functions described in an<br />

HDL. These functions can be archived and<br />

resynthesized in subsequent <strong>design</strong>s using the<br />

various commercially available logic sjmthesis<br />

packages.<br />

We believe that the backbone of tomorrow's<br />

technology advantage will depend heavily on an<br />

<strong>electronic</strong>s manufacturer's portfolio of intellectual<br />

property or <strong>design</strong>s. Revise of these <strong>design</strong>s<br />

will become critical as manufacturers strive to<br />

fill the widening gap between <strong>design</strong> productivity<br />

levels and the relentiess advancement of<br />

semiconductor fabrication capabilities. Establishing<br />

a hbrary (or "war chest") of <strong>design</strong>s that can<br />

be readily reused (and perhaps enhanced) will<br />

enable manufacturers to both reduce <strong>design</strong> time<br />

and improve product qx;iality. Quality vdll<br />

improve because the reused portion of the system<br />

wiU have already vmdergone verification<br />

during the previous product <strong>design</strong> cycle. Of<br />

coiirse, these <strong>design</strong>s wiU require reverification<br />

when integrated into the new product <strong>design</strong>.<br />

Hidden within the reuse methodology is the<br />

learning curve associated with archiving <strong>design</strong>s<br />

and integrating the drcuitiy into the next-generation<br />

product. Dataquesf s research indicates that<br />

the methodology requires a 12- to 18-month<br />

learning curve.<br />

Akin to remapping, which was discussed earlier,<br />

fovmdry independence is another key advantage<br />

inherent to reusable HDL models. Because the<br />

circuitry is described in a high-level generic language,<br />

the models can be retargeted to almost<br />

any tovmdry's fabrication process.<br />

Dissecting the Top-Down Design Marlcet<br />

Logic Synthesis<br />

The logic synthesis market continues to<br />

experience robust expansion, despite relatively<br />

few vendors. Over the past three years, the<br />

leading players in the EDA industry have<br />

been tmable to moimt a seriotis threat to<br />

Synopsys' market position. Sjmopsys has been<br />

July 27, <strong>1992</strong> ©<strong>1992</strong> Dataquest Incorporated C<strong>CAM</strong>-EDA-DP-9202

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!