The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...
The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...
The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
they designed their continuum, were not able to see how pr<strong>of</strong>essional petty producers<br />
would become. <strong>The</strong> term itself is actually appalling in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong><br />
fandom, as <strong>Holmes</strong> fans have been contributing scholarly analysis on their subject since<br />
the beginning <strong>of</strong> the 20 th century. Thankfully, it is the multi-dimensional nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Holmes</strong> franchise that allows me to cover every aspect <strong>of</strong> fandom, therefore<br />
encouraging the idea that fandom is a continuum built on degrees and variation.<br />
Degrees <strong>of</strong> saturation<br />
Sandvoss (2005) believes that even “the notion <strong>of</strong> a continuum implies a difference <strong>of</strong><br />
degree, rather than kind, between different audience groups” (p. 30). This “notion” is<br />
supported by Bailey (2005), who finds that the varying degrees <strong>of</strong> audiences reflect<br />
media saturation: “If all audience members are saturated – to use Gergen‟s term – by<br />
experiences with media, there are differing degrees and inflections to this saturation” (p.<br />
48-49). Bailey (2005) believes that it is the audience‟s interaction with the media that<br />
cultivates varying degrees and that the relationship between product and viewer should<br />
be a scholar‟s true focus, not the interactions between fans and their fan communities.<br />
Gray et al. (2007) similarly find Abercrombie and Longhurst‟s continuum (1998) to be<br />
only a starting point from which scholars may begin exploring fandom‟s diversity and<br />
stages <strong>of</strong> fan cultivation:<br />
From a contemporary perspective, the first and the second wave <strong>of</strong> fan studies<br />
. . . focused primarily on what we now recognise (in line with Abercrombie and<br />
Longhurst‟s [1998] typology <strong>of</strong> fan audiences) to be only one, and possibly the<br />
smallest subset <strong>of</strong> fan groups on a wide spectrum spanning from regular,<br />
emotionally uninvolved audience members to petty producers. <strong>The</strong> immediate, if<br />
sometimes implicit intervention <strong>of</strong> recent work on fan audiences . . . has thus<br />
been to change the goalposts <strong>of</strong> inquiry and to broaden our analytic scope to a<br />
wide range <strong>of</strong> different audiences reflecting fandom‟s growing cultural currency.<br />
With this empirical shift, the field <strong>of</strong> fan studies has become increasingly diverse<br />
in conceptual, theoretical, and methodological terms, and has broadened the<br />
scope <strong>of</strong> its inquiry on both ends <strong>of</strong> the spectrum between self and society. (p. 8)<br />
Bourdieu’s economistic approach<br />
“Bourdieu supposes that cultural life can be modelled by taking an „economistic‟<br />
approach” (Hills, 2002, p. 47). Bourdieu‟s economistic theory suggests fandoms are<br />
15