30.06.2013 Views

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

emotional, or cognitive); they trespass upon others‟ property; they grab it and hold onto<br />

it; they internalise its meaning and remake these borrowed terms” (Jenkins, 1992, p.<br />

62). I did not engage in poaching myself, an enamoured exercise in producing amateur<br />

fan fiction and online products. I sought out published fan-works instead, specifically<br />

pastiches. When reading the pastiches, <strong>The</strong> Beekeeper’s Apprentice (1994) and <strong>The</strong><br />

Veiled Detective (<strong>2009</strong>), I responded like a consumer; sceptical and economically aware<br />

<strong>of</strong> the products entertainment value. As a result, I never took to the novels and was<br />

constantly critical <strong>of</strong> their portrayal. Having been cultivated in such a way, I returned to<br />

the enchantment <strong>of</strong> the original products.<br />

Enamoured fan and educated fan<br />

From my ethnographic experience, I surmised that the group commonly described as<br />

enthusiasts embodies two separate avenues <strong>of</strong> cultivation: enamoured and educated.<br />

Sandvoss (2005), commenting on Abercrombie and Longhurst‟s audience continuum<br />

(1998), defined enthusiasts as fans who have ceased consuming “the original mass-<br />

mediated object <strong>of</strong> [their] fandom” (p. 31); instead, they are now defined by “their own<br />

activity and textual productivity” (Sandvoss, 2005, p. 31). In relation to Bourdieu‟s<br />

social hierarchy (as cited in Hills, 2002), the knowledge and involvement <strong>of</strong> enthusiasts<br />

aligns them within the category <strong>of</strong> dominated bourgeois: “<strong>The</strong> dominated fraction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bourgeoisie relies on (and seeks to increase) its highly developed cultural capital”<br />

(Hills, 2002, p. 48). According to Hills (2002), this elite group <strong>of</strong> fans consists <strong>of</strong><br />

“bohemians, scholars, [and] intellectuals” (p. 47). However, in using the term “elite”, I<br />

imply that cultivation and division still exists. McLaughlin (as cited in Hills, 2002)<br />

believes that there is the cultivated state <strong>of</strong> an elite fan, while Hills (2002), coinciding<br />

with Bourdieu‟s theory (as cited in Hills, 2002) <strong>of</strong> hierarchical dominance, believes in<br />

the powerless elite. <strong>The</strong> enamoured fan is <strong>of</strong>ten a fan driven by emotion and<br />

favouritism. I am not saying that they are any less <strong>of</strong> an enthusiast than an educated fan;<br />

however, they remain emotionally enchanted consumers. <strong>The</strong> enamoured fan has the<br />

potential to remain powerless unless they seek a higher educated or pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

position within their fandom. I, at this stage, became committed to finishing the canon.<br />

However, while I returned to the original products with a newfound appreciation for the<br />

texts, having read pastiches and seeing various adaptations, I still harboured enamoured<br />

tendencies and therefore returned to the original product wanting to relive the<br />

enchantment <strong>of</strong> Granada‟s adaption. Under the influence <strong>of</strong> Granada‟s imagery, I read<br />

<strong>The</strong> Return <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (1905/2005d) and the first novel <strong>of</strong> the canon, A <strong>Study</strong><br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!