The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...
The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...
The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Model<br />
From my findings, I have discovered the cultivation process <strong>of</strong> my fandom, and by the<br />
examination <strong>of</strong> my ethnographic journey, I am able to design both a continuum and a<br />
model <strong>of</strong> my cultivation as a fan by the media. My proposed model was originally<br />
limited to four distinct degrees <strong>of</strong> audience-to-fan cultivation: general audience, fan,<br />
enamoured fan and educated fan. <strong>The</strong> enamoured and educated section was presented as<br />
parallel to each other, implying that both states were equal in their position. Figure 1,<br />
however, Abercrombie and Longhurst‟s audience continuum (1998), encouraged my<br />
simple theory to encompass the varying degrees <strong>of</strong> cultivation between those proposed<br />
five states <strong>of</strong> cultivation. Figure 1, while crucial to the development <strong>of</strong> my theory is, in<br />
itself, over-simplified and impersonal. In designing a continuum to accompany this<br />
study, I wished to combine my own theories and those <strong>of</strong> other theorists to expand upon<br />
the <strong>of</strong>ten-limited representation <strong>of</strong> fandom. I, therefore, developed a consumer-to-fan<br />
cultivation continuum:<br />
General Audience – Follower – Proto-Fan – Fan – Working Class Fan – Fan-As-<br />
Consumer –Petit Bourgeois – Poacher – Enthusiast – Educated Fan and<br />
Enamoured Fan – Dominated Bourgeois – Elite Fan – Fan-Academic and<br />
Academic-Fan – Executive Fan<br />
Figure 6. Consumer-to-fan cultivation continuum.<br />
Figure 6 expands upon my initial model and encompasses the theories <strong>of</strong> Abercrombie<br />
and Longhurst (1998), Grossberg (as cited in Jenkins, 1992), Tulloch and Jenkins (as<br />
cited in Hills, 2002), Hills (2002), Bourdieu (as cited in Hills, 2002), De Certeau (as<br />
cited in Jenkins, 1992), McLaughlin (as cited in Hills, 2002), and Gray et al. (2007). By<br />
incorporating the various ideas and definitions <strong>of</strong> kinds <strong>of</strong> fans from these scholars, I am<br />
able to produce a continuum that draws upon the research and examination <strong>of</strong> those<br />
before me, and hopefully contribute to the progression <strong>of</strong> research dedicated to this area<br />
<strong>of</strong> fan studies. What I was unable to capture, however, was the limits <strong>of</strong> cultivation; in<br />
other words, when the cultivation process ends. Abercrombie and Longhurst‟s<br />
continuum (1998) proposes that the position <strong>of</strong> petty producer is the most advanced<br />
which an audience member can achieve. I, however, have found it difficult to assign a<br />
state <strong>of</strong> limitation to cultivation, for I am aware that I have yet to experience community<br />
fandom and this avenue would develop, or even alter, the entire model altogether.<br />
82