30.06.2013 Views

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Model<br />

From my findings, I have discovered the cultivation process <strong>of</strong> my fandom, and by the<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> my ethnographic journey, I am able to design both a continuum and a<br />

model <strong>of</strong> my cultivation as a fan by the media. My proposed model was originally<br />

limited to four distinct degrees <strong>of</strong> audience-to-fan cultivation: general audience, fan,<br />

enamoured fan and educated fan. <strong>The</strong> enamoured and educated section was presented as<br />

parallel to each other, implying that both states were equal in their position. Figure 1,<br />

however, Abercrombie and Longhurst‟s audience continuum (1998), encouraged my<br />

simple theory to encompass the varying degrees <strong>of</strong> cultivation between those proposed<br />

five states <strong>of</strong> cultivation. Figure 1, while crucial to the development <strong>of</strong> my theory is, in<br />

itself, over-simplified and impersonal. In designing a continuum to accompany this<br />

study, I wished to combine my own theories and those <strong>of</strong> other theorists to expand upon<br />

the <strong>of</strong>ten-limited representation <strong>of</strong> fandom. I, therefore, developed a consumer-to-fan<br />

cultivation continuum:<br />

General Audience – Follower – Proto-Fan – Fan – Working Class Fan – Fan-As-<br />

Consumer –Petit Bourgeois – Poacher – Enthusiast – Educated Fan and<br />

Enamoured Fan – Dominated Bourgeois – Elite Fan – Fan-Academic and<br />

Academic-Fan – Executive Fan<br />

Figure 6. Consumer-to-fan cultivation continuum.<br />

Figure 6 expands upon my initial model and encompasses the theories <strong>of</strong> Abercrombie<br />

and Longhurst (1998), Grossberg (as cited in Jenkins, 1992), Tulloch and Jenkins (as<br />

cited in Hills, 2002), Hills (2002), Bourdieu (as cited in Hills, 2002), De Certeau (as<br />

cited in Jenkins, 1992), McLaughlin (as cited in Hills, 2002), and Gray et al. (2007). By<br />

incorporating the various ideas and definitions <strong>of</strong> kinds <strong>of</strong> fans from these scholars, I am<br />

able to produce a continuum that draws upon the research and examination <strong>of</strong> those<br />

before me, and hopefully contribute to the progression <strong>of</strong> research dedicated to this area<br />

<strong>of</strong> fan studies. What I was unable to capture, however, was the limits <strong>of</strong> cultivation; in<br />

other words, when the cultivation process ends. Abercrombie and Longhurst‟s<br />

continuum (1998) proposes that the position <strong>of</strong> petty producer is the most advanced<br />

which an audience member can achieve. I, however, have found it difficult to assign a<br />

state <strong>of</strong> limitation to cultivation, for I am aware that I have yet to experience community<br />

fandom and this avenue would develop, or even alter, the entire model altogether.<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!