The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...
The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...
The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Creative component<br />
Critiques<br />
Regardless <strong>of</strong> the cultural or social status assigned to an object, a fan manages to see its<br />
worth and find the wealth <strong>of</strong> knowledge within it. According to Jenkins (1992),<br />
“fandom‟s very existence represents a critique <strong>of</strong> conventional forms <strong>of</strong> consumer<br />
culture” (p. 283):<br />
Organised fandom is, perhaps first and foremost, an institution <strong>of</strong> theory and<br />
criticism, a semistructured space where competing interpretations and<br />
evaluations <strong>of</strong> common texts are proposed, debated, and negotiated and where<br />
readers speculate about the nature <strong>of</strong> the mass media and their own relationship<br />
to it. (Jenkins, 1992, p. 86)<br />
I will examine the findings <strong>of</strong> my cultivation analysis and use the patterns generated and<br />
the sources relied upon to direct a critique <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>) to exemplify the<br />
particular fan status I have achieved, while utilising my understanding <strong>of</strong> fandom. Hills<br />
(2002) states “fans are <strong>of</strong>ten highly articulate. Fans interpret media texts in a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
interesting and perhaps unexpected ways” (p. ix). <strong>The</strong>refore, I have chosen to apply my<br />
findings and my model outcome towards forming <strong>of</strong> a critique, written from the<br />
perspective <strong>of</strong> an educated fan. <strong>The</strong> choice <strong>of</strong> an educated position for this critique is<br />
not to promote any particular kind <strong>of</strong> fan over another, this position simply reveals the<br />
extent to which I was cultivated and the critical nature fans possess towards their<br />
“object <strong>of</strong> consumption” (Gray et al., 2007, p. 11). Jenkins (1992) finds that “fans<br />
would be the first to acknowledge their flaws and shortcomings” (p. 53). With<br />
hindsight, this position coincides with my development as a fan and academic, as<br />
<strong>Holmes</strong> fandom develops into a playful academic exercise, and answers the question:<br />
When does a consumer become a fan, and what happens next?<br />
33