30.06.2013 Views

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Creative component<br />

Critiques<br />

Regardless <strong>of</strong> the cultural or social status assigned to an object, a fan manages to see its<br />

worth and find the wealth <strong>of</strong> knowledge within it. According to Jenkins (1992),<br />

“fandom‟s very existence represents a critique <strong>of</strong> conventional forms <strong>of</strong> consumer<br />

culture” (p. 283):<br />

Organised fandom is, perhaps first and foremost, an institution <strong>of</strong> theory and<br />

criticism, a semistructured space where competing interpretations and<br />

evaluations <strong>of</strong> common texts are proposed, debated, and negotiated and where<br />

readers speculate about the nature <strong>of</strong> the mass media and their own relationship<br />

to it. (Jenkins, 1992, p. 86)<br />

I will examine the findings <strong>of</strong> my cultivation analysis and use the patterns generated and<br />

the sources relied upon to direct a critique <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>) to exemplify the<br />

particular fan status I have achieved, while utilising my understanding <strong>of</strong> fandom. Hills<br />

(2002) states “fans are <strong>of</strong>ten highly articulate. Fans interpret media texts in a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

interesting and perhaps unexpected ways” (p. ix). <strong>The</strong>refore, I have chosen to apply my<br />

findings and my model outcome towards forming <strong>of</strong> a critique, written from the<br />

perspective <strong>of</strong> an educated fan. <strong>The</strong> choice <strong>of</strong> an educated position for this critique is<br />

not to promote any particular kind <strong>of</strong> fan over another, this position simply reveals the<br />

extent to which I was cultivated and the critical nature fans possess towards their<br />

“object <strong>of</strong> consumption” (Gray et al., 2007, p. 11). Jenkins (1992) finds that “fans<br />

would be the first to acknowledge their flaws and shortcomings” (p. 53). With<br />

hindsight, this position coincides with my development as a fan and academic, as<br />

<strong>Holmes</strong> fandom develops into a playful academic exercise, and answers the question:<br />

When does a consumer become a fan, and what happens next?<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!