Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my amazing supervisor, Gregory Treadwell. I most certainly would not have gotten nearly this far without his encouragement and support. Secondly, I thank my family and friends for their enthusiasm, and thirdly, I must thank Sir Arthur Conan Doyle for creating <strong>The</strong> Great Detective, <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>) for introducing me to him, and finally, Jeremy Brett for allowing me to meet him. 2
Abstract This study investigates a consumer‟s relationship with mass media and the cultivation <strong>of</strong> the consumer‟s consequent state <strong>of</strong> fandom. <strong>The</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> this study encompasses the commercialisation <strong>of</strong> storytelling‟s social functions, the media‟s ability to manipulate both viewers and scholars, and an examination into the practice <strong>of</strong> cultivation theory and its relationship with culture. Within this study, the definition and application <strong>of</strong> the term “fan” is questioned, and both the theoretical and commercial value <strong>of</strong> studying this particular part <strong>of</strong> the audience is examined. Both the objective and scope <strong>of</strong> this study is inspired by Abercrombie and Longhurst‟s audience continuum (1998) and by Bourdieu‟s economic class system (as cited in Hills, 2002). Abercrombie and Longhurst (1998) place fans along a five-stage continuum, which includes the consumer, the cultist, enthusiast, and petty producer. Bourdieu, from a cultural studies perspective, defines fandom as a working class interaction with a text, and places them last on his own scale after the dominant bourgeoisie, the dominated bourgeoisie and the petit bourgeoisie (as cited in Hills, 2002). <strong>The</strong> practical objective <strong>of</strong> this study is to expand upon these theories and to construct a working model <strong>of</strong> the fan cultivation process. In terms <strong>of</strong> methodology, this study is an instrumental and collective case study about a consumer‟s cultivated response to the movie <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>). It is designed to be a qualitative humanistic examination <strong>of</strong> fan cultivation, adopting pure participant observation and variation <strong>of</strong> observant participation ethnography as its primary method <strong>of</strong> research. <strong>The</strong> researcher undertakes the ethnographic position <strong>of</strong> the cultivated consumer and documents her journey in an ethnographic journal divided into three sections: substantive, analytic and thick description field notes. <strong>The</strong> researcher, while on her ethnographic journey, engages with various franchise-related products. <strong>The</strong>se products are divided into categories: the primary product, original products, and <strong>of</strong>ficial secondary and un<strong>of</strong>ficial secondary products. <strong>The</strong> field notes collected undergo a reflexive examination and a cultivation analysis. As a result, the researcher is subsequently cultivated to the degree <strong>of</strong> an educated academic-fan, revealing that consumption coupled with consistency cultivates a consumer‟s investment and loyalty towards a product and ultimately fandom, and that fandom is the emotional consumption <strong>of</strong> consistent enchantment. In turn, a consumer-to-fan cultivation continuum and model is designed, and a creative component critique is constructed to exemplify the model. This case study therefore answers the question: When does a consumer become a fan, and what happens next? 3
- Page 1 and 2: The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Attestation of Au
- Page 5 and 6: List of Figures Figure 1. Abercromb
- Page 7: Attestation of Authorship I hereby
- Page 11 and 12: Abercrombie and Longhurst‟s audie
- Page 13 and 14: and Morgan‟s (1990) and Shanahan
- Page 15 and 16: two and turn them into action” (G
- Page 17 and 18: Jenkins (1992), however, would disa
- Page 19 and 20: that to be a secondary phase, a res
- Page 21 and 22: they designed their continuum, were
- Page 23 and 24: economistic theory, alongside Aberc
- Page 25 and 26: informs us that we take our communi
- Page 27 and 28: Methodology This chapter explains t
- Page 29 and 30: albeit in Sherlock Holmes for Dummi
- Page 31 and 32: Figure 2. Original model from Maste
- Page 33 and 34: and like many, have a stereotypical
- Page 35 and 36: Drawing from Shanahan and Morgan (1
- Page 37 and 38: Model My research advocates the the
- Page 39 and 40: Creative component Critiques Regard
- Page 41 and 42: ethnographic position is made on tw
- Page 43 and 44: Table 2. Ethnographic order of prod
- Page 45 and 46: Good Doctor to placate any qualms t
- Page 47 and 48: preconception was derived from its
- Page 49 and 50: and Watson in defeating Lord Blackw
- Page 51 and 52: The common picture of Holmes is of
- Page 53 and 54: “embrace of fiction” (p. 606) a
- Page 55 and 56: was lost. Therefore, Doyle‟s orig
- Page 57 and 58: this was the only Holmes novel the
- Page 59 and 60:
9). While the tale and its quick pu
- Page 61 and 62:
his feet with a cry of pleasure.
- Page 63 and 64:
Cultivation analysis: Official seco
- Page 65 and 66:
their flaws and their frailties, in
- Page 67 and 68:
may suggest, this film is not a dir
- Page 69 and 70:
Holmes in the role of supporting ac
- Page 71 and 72:
have endeavoured to intertwine and
- Page 73 and 74:
Official secondary products: The Pr
- Page 75 and 76:
245). Redmond‟s (2009) statement,
- Page 77 and 78:
“shocking affair of the Dutch ste
- Page 79 and 80:
cited in Jenkins, 1992, p. 32). In
- Page 81 and 82:
The fan Sandvoss (2005) believes th
- Page 83 and 84:
emotional, or cognitive); they tres
- Page 85 and 86:
knowledgeable fans [who] may . . .
- Page 87 and 88:
negative connotation, for it no lon
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 6, the consumer-to-fan culti
- Page 91 and 92:
Creative Component Introduction Fan
- Page 93 and 94:
esponsible, Lord Blackwood, played
- Page 95 and 96:
short and are exposed as fraudulent
- Page 97 and 98:
Conclusion We take our communicatio
- Page 99 and 100:
References Abercrombie, N., & Longh
- Page 101 and 102:
Davies, D. S. (2009). The further a
- Page 103 and 104:
Doyle, A. C. (2005k). The case-book
- Page 105 and 106:
Jenkins, H. (2007). Afterword: The
- Page 107 and 108:
Signorielli, N., & Morgan, M. (1990
- Page 109 and 110:
Bibliography Ackroyd, P. (2001). In
- Page 111:
Miller, P. V. (1994). Made-to-order