30.06.2013 Views

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

subject had the potential to be cultivated further. Hence, I embodied Tulloch and<br />

Jenkin‟s definition <strong>of</strong> a follower (as cited in Hills, 2002, p. x). <strong>The</strong> product I engaged<br />

with that helped cultivate my fandom to this state was the cast and crew interviews <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>). Found on YouTube, these un<strong>of</strong>ficial secondary products<br />

contained traces <strong>of</strong> the film‟s enchantment. Interviews with actors, directors, producers<br />

and even the authors <strong>of</strong> a media product are an interesting aspect <strong>of</strong> fandom. According<br />

to Saler‟s (2003) theory <strong>of</strong> enchantment, each viewer, whether a fan or not, possesses an<br />

“ironic imagination” (p. 606) and the ability to embrace both fiction and reality.<br />

Interestingly, it follows that a follower and a fan <strong>of</strong>ten seek out interviews and behind-<br />

the-scenes footage. I obviously did, for I found the real-world aspects <strong>of</strong> the film‟s<br />

production to be equally as enchanting as the final product. I believe this is because,<br />

without knowledgeable discernment, I associated all forms <strong>of</strong> memorabilia with the<br />

enchantment <strong>of</strong> the primary product, <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>). I soon progressed from<br />

Tulloch and Jenkins follower (as cited in Hills, 2002, p. x) to Hills (2002) proto-fan.<br />

According to Hill‟s (2002), proto-fans are “fans in the making” (p.55). <strong>The</strong>y have yet to<br />

claim the status <strong>of</strong> a fan but they show signs <strong>of</strong> lasting commitment. At this stage <strong>of</strong> my<br />

fandom, general audience knowledge still guided my choices in products, so, in an<br />

attempt to engage with the original <strong>Holmes</strong> products, I read <strong>The</strong> Hounds <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Baskervilles (1902/2003). When I encountered the original character, all previous<br />

commercial enchantment conjured by <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>) was replaced with<br />

genuine intrigue; I soon became enchanted by the contradiction <strong>of</strong> characterisations that<br />

I witnessed. Between viewing <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>) and reading <strong>The</strong> Hound <strong>of</strong><br />

Baskervilles (1902/2003), I was similarly enchanted by my own inability to understand<br />

what I thought was a seemingly straightforward character. I therefore returned to<br />

YouTube with the hope <strong>of</strong> finding a visual adaptation that would define the character<br />

for me, for while the internet is one medium in itself, it is also a platform for many<br />

others, making the internet an extremely powerful tool in the cultivation <strong>of</strong> a fan. <strong>The</strong><br />

messages this medium transmits draws upon the combined efforts <strong>of</strong> all the mediums<br />

that precedes it. Through it the consumer can not only relive their fandom but revive it<br />

as well. YouTube <strong>of</strong>ten influenced the direction <strong>of</strong> my fandom by displaying television,<br />

film and literary products alongside each other. <strong>The</strong>re I soon found Granada‟s <strong>Sherlock</strong><br />

<strong>Holmes</strong> (1984-1994).<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!