30.06.2013 Views

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

The Case Study of Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Scholarly Commons ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

To inspire such a reaction from a modern audience may be more difficult to achieve due<br />

to <strong>Holmes</strong>‟s popular stereotype. But if <strong>Holmes</strong> had existed, which the original products<br />

clearly state, consider for a moment the dramatic shift it would cause in a reader‟s<br />

perspective, for the possibility that <strong>The</strong> Great Detective was alive while you read about<br />

him transforms the text‟s ability to cultivate and casts a spell <strong>of</strong> enchantment near<br />

impossible to break. This was Starrett‟s (2008) original audience. Today, however, no<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> advertising and marketing could cultivate that kind <strong>of</strong> intrigue:<br />

[For] there can be no grave for <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> or Watson . . . Shall they not<br />

always live in Baker Street? Are they not there this instant, as one writes? . . . So<br />

they still live for all that love them well: in a romantic chamber <strong>of</strong> the heart: in a<br />

nostalgic country <strong>of</strong> the mind: where it is always 1895. (Starrett, 2008, p. 93)<br />

Cultivation analysis: Un<strong>of</strong>ficial secondary products<br />

Un<strong>of</strong>ficial secondary products are produced by fans for fans. Abercrombie and<br />

Longhurst (1998) would classify this category as petty producers. However, due to the<br />

expansion <strong>of</strong> technology since the creation <strong>of</strong> that term, a pretty producer is now a far<br />

more accessible position. Un<strong>of</strong>ficial products are <strong>of</strong>ten published online, in either video<br />

or text format, and are accompanied with a copyright disclaimer. Due to the number <strong>of</strong><br />

un<strong>of</strong>ficial products, I chose only to interact those works published on Youtube, an<br />

online video sharing platform, and Fanfiction.com, an extensive community based<br />

website in which amateur authors upload pastiches, a term used rather loosely in this<br />

instance, for entertainment and criticism.<br />

Un<strong>of</strong>ficial secondary products: Youtube images<br />

After my initial viewing <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>) and before I began reading the<br />

original products, I turned to Youtube for information. Having soon become acquainted<br />

with cast interviews for <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>), which qualify as <strong>of</strong>ficial secondary<br />

products because they are produced by media outlets only uploaded by fans, I decided<br />

to expand my search and ventured towards previous <strong>Holmes</strong> adaptations. While<br />

browsing corresponding playlists would <strong>of</strong>fer various videos featuring related material,<br />

it was here that I first viewed a clip <strong>of</strong> Granada‟s <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (1984-1994). This<br />

was a pivotal point in my cultivation process. Before <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> (<strong>2009</strong>),<br />

Granada‟s “Jeremy Brett . . . was quickly transformed from a Shakespearean actor . . .<br />

into the best-known <strong>Sherlock</strong> <strong>Holmes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the electronic era by far” (Redmond, <strong>2009</strong>, p.<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!