96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Abstracts<br />
FR-P-120<br />
How effective are heart valve donation from old organ donors?<br />
K . Große 1 , R . Meyer 2 , C . Wesslau 3 , D . Bösebeck 1 , G . Kirste 4 , R . Hetzer 2<br />
1 Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation, Northeast Region, Berlin, 2 Deutsches<br />
Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, 3 Foundation of European Tissue Banks,<br />
Berlin, 4 Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation, Frankfurt am Main<br />
Aims. There is no upper age limit for organ donation and a quarter of all<br />
organ donors are 65 years old and ol<strong>der</strong>. The Northeast Region of the<br />
Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation and the Cardiovascular Tissue<br />
Bank of the Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin examined 1.) 1999–2004<br />
whether heart valves from organ donors over the former age limit of<br />
65 years for heart valve donation were morphologically suitable as grafts<br />
and 2.) 2005–2009 after raising the age limit to 70 years the clinical acceptance<br />
of heart valve grafts from organ donors of 65 to 70 years of age.<br />
Methods. 1.) 1999–2004 the heart valves of 100 old organ donors (female/male:<br />
55/45, median age: 71.5) were examined in accordance with the<br />
standards of the Bio Implant Services (BIS). To compare the valve grafts<br />
above and below the age limit of 65 years, we used data on the aortic and<br />
pulmonary valves of 380 organ donors below the age limit in the same<br />
time period. 2.) 2005–2009 we harvested 49 hearts from organ donors 65<br />
to 70 years of age for processing heart valve grafts in accordance with the<br />
BIS-standards. One aortic and 21 pulmonary valves (25%) of these organ<br />
donors (female/male: 11/10, median age: 67) were suitable as grafts. One<br />
year after valve replacement we send the recipients’ physicans a form to<br />
gather information about valve failure, success of transplantation and<br />
current morphological and functional state of the valve graft.<br />
Results. 1.) Half of all heart valves above and below the former age limit<br />
would have fulfilled the morphological standards as grafts. The great<br />
majority (85%) of old pulmonary valves fulfilled the acceptance criteria,<br />
48% even showing good tissue quality. 2.) 2005–2009 the aortic and the<br />
21 pulmonary valve grafts have been allocated to recipients (female/male:<br />
6/15, median age: 32) suffering from late sequelae of congenital diseases<br />
with defects of the either native valves or former grafts. Successful treatment<br />
without morphological and functional alterations of the grafts<br />
1 year after replacement was reported from the aortic and 13 pulmonary<br />
valve grafts. Five further valve grafts were transplanted but follow-up<br />
1 year later is unknown. One recipient of a pulmonary valve graft died<br />
postoperatively of left ventricular failure. In 2 cases accepted valve grafts<br />
were not transplanted because the surgeons decided intra-operatively on<br />
another procedure.<br />
Conclusions. The data clearly demonstrate, that heart valves grafts from<br />
donors 65 years of age and ol<strong>der</strong> can safely be used with good long-term<br />
success.<br />
FR-P-121<br />
Change of external surface roughness of vascular implants improves<br />
implant tissue integration<br />
M . Otto1 , J . Kriegsmann1 , S . Bertz2 1Supra-regional Joint Practice of Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics<br />
Trier – Düren – Düsseldorf, Medical Health Center for Histology,<br />
Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics, Trier, 2University of Erlangen, Institute<br />
of Pathology, Erlangen<br />
Aims. Today, one of the most important problems in implant medicine is<br />
an optimal designed biointegration of implants. A controlled biointegration<br />
of vascular implants is essential for an optimal biofunction as well as<br />
for biosafety. The fast fixation of the vascular prosthesis reduces the risk<br />
of infection as well as thrombosis, two major events which lead to rapid<br />
functional loss. Implants with a silver coating, used to inhibit implant infection<br />
were modified at the outer surface to accelerate tissue integration.<br />
Methods. Silver coated vascular implant material based on expanded<br />
polytetrafluorethylen (ePTFE, expanded Teflon) was modified by application<br />
of a microwave procedure. Two different protocols of microwave<br />
application induce remodeling of the implant surface. At the first step,<br />
122 | Der Pathologe · Supplement 1 · 2012<br />
the material is implanted subcutaneously in a defined sheep model. The<br />
tissue integration of the implant was analyzed after 6 weeks by interposition<br />
of the implants at the Arteria carotis in a sheep model. We used<br />
8 cm long routinely used but surface modified implants with a diameter<br />
of 6 mm. We used two implants, one with highly and one with slightly<br />
modified surface roughness. The implants were histomorphologically<br />
evaluated using qualitative parameters as well as semiquantitative parameters<br />
of vascularization, inflammation, peri-implant fibrous reaction<br />
and giant cell induction. The tissue reaction was compared to the standardized,<br />
clinically used and FDA accredited SilverGraft prosthesis.<br />
Results. After an implantation period of 6 weeks the thrombogenicity<br />
of implants was not significantly changed. Formation of fibrotic neointima<br />
as well the endothelialization of the inner implant surface was<br />
changed. Other histological parameters – lymphocytic infiltration, granulocytic<br />
infiltration and giant cell density – did not show any alteration<br />
by implant surface modification. The slightly modified implants show<br />
a stronger vascularization and mildly increased thickness of peri-implant<br />
fibrosis. The highly modified implants show no significant change<br />
in vascularization but a minimal increase of thickness of peri-implant<br />
membrane.<br />
Conclusions. The change of implant surface roughness effectively improves<br />
the integration of new developed vascular implant devices by<br />
boosting integration into the peri-implant connective tissue without any<br />
change of typical parameters correlating with biosafety of the vascular<br />
implant material. The highest biofunctionality is found in those implants<br />
with slightly increased surface roughness.<br />
FR-P-122<br />
Change of inner surface of ePTFE vascular implants by immobilization<br />
of heparin and heparan sulfate<br />
M . Otto1 , J . Kriegsmann1 , S . Bertz2 1Supra-regional Joint Practice of Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics<br />
Trier – Düren – Düsseldorf, Medical Health Center for Histology,<br />
Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics, Trier, 2University of Erlangen, Institute<br />
of Pathology, Erlangen<br />
Aims. Today, one of the most important problems in vascular implant<br />
medicine is thrombosis. Complete or incomplete occlusion of vascular<br />
implants by thrombotic masses is the most unfavorable event in vascular<br />
endoprosthesis and results in insufficient biofunctionality of the<br />
implants. During the last decade several implant coatings were used to<br />
reduce thrombotic events.<br />
Methods. The inner implant surface of ePTFE vascular implants (ePTFE,<br />
expanded Teflon) was modified by a coating of polyurethane with covalent<br />
bounded heparin as well as heparin sulfate. To analyze the thrombogenicity<br />
of these modified materials vascular implants were applied<br />
in a sheep model by interposition into the A. carotis. Routinely clinically<br />
used but surface-modified implants with a diameter of 6mm and a<br />
length of 8 cm were applied. Morphology of the implants was analyzed<br />
after 6 weeks of implantation by morphologic evaluation of qualitative<br />
parameters, especially thrombotic changes at the material surface. Further<br />
parameters were semiquantitative analysis of inflammation, periimplant<br />
reaction and giant cell induction. The tissue reaction was compared<br />
to the standardized, routinely used and FDA accredited ePTFE- as<br />
well as GoreTex-prosthesis.<br />
Results. After an implantation period of 6 weeks implants with heparin<br />
and heparin sulfate coating show macroscopically more and stronger<br />
thrombotic events compared to the uncoated ePTFE and GoreTex-controls.<br />
The morphological analysis of the thrombotic material shows in<br />
the heparin group an early thrombosis of the implants, often with luminal<br />
fibrotic organization. On the other hand, the heparan sulfate group<br />
shows late thrombosis without any organization effects. The rate of<br />
morphologically demonstrable thrombotic events in the heparin group<br />
(37.5%) and the heparin sulfate group (75%) exceed the control rate of 10%<br />
by far. The heparin sulfate group shows a consi<strong>der</strong>able reduced rate of