13.07.2013 Views

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstracts<br />

FR-P-120<br />

How effective are heart valve donation from old organ donors?<br />

K . Große 1 , R . Meyer 2 , C . Wesslau 3 , D . Bösebeck 1 , G . Kirste 4 , R . Hetzer 2<br />

1 Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation, Northeast Region, Berlin, 2 Deutsches<br />

Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, 3 Foundation of European Tissue Banks,<br />

Berlin, 4 Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation, Frankfurt am Main<br />

Aims. There is no upper age limit for organ donation and a quarter of all<br />

organ donors are 65 years old and ol<strong>der</strong>. The Northeast Region of the<br />

Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation and the Cardiovascular Tissue<br />

Bank of the Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin examined 1.) 1999–2004<br />

whether heart valves from organ donors over the former age limit of<br />

65 years for heart valve donation were morphologically suitable as grafts<br />

and 2.) 2005–2009 after raising the age limit to 70 years the clinical acceptance<br />

of heart valve grafts from organ donors of 65 to 70 years of age.<br />

Methods. 1.) 1999–2004 the heart valves of 100 old organ donors (female/male:<br />

55/45, median age: 71.5) were examined in accordance with the<br />

standards of the Bio Implant Services (BIS). To compare the valve grafts<br />

above and below the age limit of 65 years, we used data on the aortic and<br />

pulmonary valves of 380 organ donors below the age limit in the same<br />

time period. 2.) 2005–2009 we harvested 49 hearts from organ donors 65<br />

to 70 years of age for processing heart valve grafts in accordance with the<br />

BIS-standards. One aortic and 21 pulmonary valves (25%) of these organ<br />

donors (female/male: 11/10, median age: 67) were suitable as grafts. One<br />

year after valve replacement we send the recipients’ physicans a form to<br />

gather information about valve failure, success of transplantation and<br />

current morphological and functional state of the valve graft.<br />

Results. 1.) Half of all heart valves above and below the former age limit<br />

would have fulfilled the morphological standards as grafts. The great<br />

majority (85%) of old pulmonary valves fulfilled the acceptance criteria,<br />

48% even showing good tissue quality. 2.) 2005–2009 the aortic and the<br />

21 pulmonary valve grafts have been allocated to recipients (female/male:<br />

6/15, median age: 32) suffering from late sequelae of congenital diseases<br />

with defects of the either native valves or former grafts. Successful treatment<br />

without morphological and functional alterations of the grafts<br />

1 year after replacement was reported from the aortic and 13 pulmonary<br />

valve grafts. Five further valve grafts were transplanted but follow-up<br />

1 year later is unknown. One recipient of a pulmonary valve graft died<br />

postoperatively of left ventricular failure. In 2 cases accepted valve grafts<br />

were not transplanted because the surgeons decided intra-operatively on<br />

another procedure.<br />

Conclusions. The data clearly demonstrate, that heart valves grafts from<br />

donors 65 years of age and ol<strong>der</strong> can safely be used with good long-term<br />

success.<br />

FR-P-121<br />

Change of external surface roughness of vascular implants improves<br />

implant tissue integration<br />

M . Otto1 , J . Kriegsmann1 , S . Bertz2 1Supra-regional Joint Practice of Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics<br />

Trier – Düren – Düsseldorf, Medical Health Center for Histology,<br />

Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics, Trier, 2University of Erlangen, Institute<br />

of Pathology, Erlangen<br />

Aims. Today, one of the most important problems in implant medicine is<br />

an optimal designed biointegration of implants. A controlled biointegration<br />

of vascular implants is essential for an optimal biofunction as well as<br />

for biosafety. The fast fixation of the vascular prosthesis reduces the risk<br />

of infection as well as thrombosis, two major events which lead to rapid<br />

functional loss. Implants with a silver coating, used to inhibit implant infection<br />

were modified at the outer surface to accelerate tissue integration.<br />

Methods. Silver coated vascular implant material based on expanded<br />

polytetrafluorethylen (ePTFE, expanded Teflon) was modified by application<br />

of a microwave procedure. Two different protocols of microwave<br />

application induce remodeling of the implant surface. At the first step,<br />

122 | Der Pathologe · Supplement 1 · 2012<br />

the material is implanted subcutaneously in a defined sheep model. The<br />

tissue integration of the implant was analyzed after 6 weeks by interposition<br />

of the implants at the Arteria carotis in a sheep model. We used<br />

8 cm long routinely used but surface modified implants with a diameter<br />

of 6 mm. We used two implants, one with highly and one with slightly<br />

modified surface roughness. The implants were histomorphologically<br />

evaluated using qualitative parameters as well as semiquantitative parameters<br />

of vascularization, inflammation, peri-implant fibrous reaction<br />

and giant cell induction. The tissue reaction was compared to the standardized,<br />

clinically used and FDA accredited SilverGraft prosthesis.<br />

Results. After an implantation period of 6 weeks the thrombogenicity<br />

of implants was not significantly changed. Formation of fibrotic neointima<br />

as well the endothelialization of the inner implant surface was<br />

changed. Other histological parameters – lymphocytic infiltration, granulocytic<br />

infiltration and giant cell density – did not show any alteration<br />

by implant surface modification. The slightly modified implants show<br />

a stronger vascularization and mildly increased thickness of peri-implant<br />

fibrosis. The highly modified implants show no significant change<br />

in vascularization but a minimal increase of thickness of peri-implant<br />

membrane.<br />

Conclusions. The change of implant surface roughness effectively improves<br />

the integration of new developed vascular implant devices by<br />

boosting integration into the peri-implant connective tissue without any<br />

change of typical parameters correlating with biosafety of the vascular<br />

implant material. The highest biofunctionality is found in those implants<br />

with slightly increased surface roughness.<br />

FR-P-122<br />

Change of inner surface of ePTFE vascular implants by immobilization<br />

of heparin and heparan sulfate<br />

M . Otto1 , J . Kriegsmann1 , S . Bertz2 1Supra-regional Joint Practice of Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics<br />

Trier – Düren – Düsseldorf, Medical Health Center for Histology,<br />

Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics, Trier, 2University of Erlangen, Institute<br />

of Pathology, Erlangen<br />

Aims. Today, one of the most important problems in vascular implant<br />

medicine is thrombosis. Complete or incomplete occlusion of vascular<br />

implants by thrombotic masses is the most unfavorable event in vascular<br />

endoprosthesis and results in insufficient biofunctionality of the<br />

implants. During the last decade several implant coatings were used to<br />

reduce thrombotic events.<br />

Methods. The inner implant surface of ePTFE vascular implants (ePTFE,<br />

expanded Teflon) was modified by a coating of polyurethane with covalent<br />

bounded heparin as well as heparin sulfate. To analyze the thrombogenicity<br />

of these modified materials vascular implants were applied<br />

in a sheep model by interposition into the A. carotis. Routinely clinically<br />

used but surface-modified implants with a diameter of 6mm and a<br />

length of 8 cm were applied. Morphology of the implants was analyzed<br />

after 6 weeks of implantation by morphologic evaluation of qualitative<br />

parameters, especially thrombotic changes at the material surface. Further<br />

parameters were semiquantitative analysis of inflammation, periimplant<br />

reaction and giant cell induction. The tissue reaction was compared<br />

to the standardized, routinely used and FDA accredited ePTFE- as<br />

well as GoreTex-prosthesis.<br />

Results. After an implantation period of 6 weeks implants with heparin<br />

and heparin sulfate coating show macroscopically more and stronger<br />

thrombotic events compared to the uncoated ePTFE and GoreTex-controls.<br />

The morphological analysis of the thrombotic material shows in<br />

the heparin group an early thrombosis of the implants, often with luminal<br />

fibrotic organization. On the other hand, the heparan sulfate group<br />

shows late thrombosis without any organization effects. The rate of<br />

morphologically demonstrable thrombotic events in the heparin group<br />

(37.5%) and the heparin sulfate group (75%) exceed the control rate of 10%<br />

by far. The heparin sulfate group shows a consi<strong>der</strong>able reduced rate of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!