96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Conclusions. The newly released 450k methylation array from Illumina<br />
provides a genome-wide representation of DNA methylation aberrations<br />
in a convenient format with direct quantification of methylation levels<br />
at each individual CpG site. However, the representation of microRNA<br />
genes and imprinted loci is quite uneven and has to be taken into account<br />
during data evaluation and <strong>der</strong>ivation of any conclusion concerning these<br />
two important classes of genes.<br />
SA-P-038<br />
Luminescent conjugated oligothiophenes: novel optical probes<br />
that detect cross beta-sheet conformation of inclusion bodies “in<br />
situ”<br />
V . Mahajan1 , T . Klingstedt2 , R . Simon2 , P . Nilsson2 , A . Thueringer1 , K . Kashofer1 ,<br />
H . Denk1 , K . Zatloukal1 , J . Haybaeck1 1 2 Medical University of Graz, Institute of Pathology, Graz, Austria, Linkoping<br />
University, Sweden<br />
Aims. Mallory-Denk bodies (MDBs) are cellular hallmarks of protein<br />
aggregation diseases such as alcoholic and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis<br />
(ASH and NASH). MDBs are also seen in other liver diseases such as<br />
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency. Additionally<br />
presence of Intracellular Hyaline bodies (IHBs) is also a common<br />
observation in HCC. Despite of advances in technologies highlighting<br />
protein conformation, structural characterisation of inclusion<br />
bodies remains unresolved. Therefore investigating molecular structure<br />
of the major MDB constituents keratin 8 (K8) and 18 (K18), p62 and ubiquitin<br />
may provide deeper mechanistic insights in MDB/IHB formation.<br />
Methods. Luminescent conjugated oligothiophenes (LCOs), h-HTAA,<br />
p-FTAA and PTAA contain swivelling thiophene backbones whose geometry<br />
modulates fluorescence properties. LCOs were demonstrated to<br />
specifically bind proteins with cross beta sheet conformation. In addition<br />
to the ol<strong>der</strong> ones the new generation of LCOs were used for in situ<br />
investigation of conformational changes in MDBs in human and murine<br />
livers.<br />
Results. LCOs demonstrated constant presence of cross beta-sheet conformation<br />
in human MDBs but not in IHBs, alpha-1-antitrypsin and<br />
ground glass inclusions. The spectral signatures collected from MDBs in<br />
ASH, NASH and HCC indicated a similar molecular structure of MDBs<br />
un<strong>der</strong> the various disease conditions. MDBs induced by 3, 5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,<br />
4-dihydrocollidine-feeding of mice revealed h-HTAA and<br />
p-FTAA binding to MDBs in all experimental stages. CHO-K1 cells<br />
transfected with various combinations of SQSTM1/p62, ubi and Krt8/<br />
Krt18 showed that K8 was more prone than K18 to lead to generation<br />
of cross beta-sheets. Aggregates of p62 alone were reproducibly negative<br />
for LCOs. Circular dichroism analysis elucidated intrinsically different<br />
conformational nature of purified K8 and K18 polypeptides.<br />
Conclusions. The comparative higher tendency of K8 to un<strong>der</strong>go conformational<br />
changes from predominantly Alpha-helical to cross β-sheet<br />
explains its essential role in MDB formation. This elucidates why the absence<br />
of K8 prevents MDB formation whereas its excess facilitates MDB<br />
formation. The nature of keratins to acquire cross beta sheet conformation<br />
appears to be dependent on intrinsic factors but may not be the consequence<br />
of pathological conditions. With PTAA, LCOs may serve as a<br />
multicolour novel diagnostic “in situ” technology that can be applied on<br />
formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded and fresh frozen tissues.<br />
SA-P-039<br />
Comparison of cobas and HC2 HPV testing in a German routine<br />
laboratory<br />
H . Ikenberg1 , C . Börsch1 , B . Pittel1 , A . Xhaja1 , F . Britz2 , T . Iftner3 1 2 Cytomol, MVZ for Cytology and Molecular Biology, Frankfurt, Roche<br />
Diagnostics, Mannheim, 3University of Tübingen, Institute for Virology,<br />
Tübingen<br />
Aims. Up to now the Digene HC2 test (Qiagen, Hilden) is regarded the<br />
gold standard for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing. Meanwhile<br />
several new test systems for HPV are available, among them the<br />
cobas HPV assay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Roche) which allows<br />
simultaneous genotyping for HPV 16 and 18. We compared the performance<br />
of the cobas HPV with the HC2 assay in cervical samples collected<br />
with the PreservCyt collection medium (Hologic, Frankfurt).<br />
Methods. 1781 anonymized routine specimens pretested with the HC2<br />
test were available for analysis with cobas HPV. Cases with discrepancies<br />
between the two tests were retested with the Linear Array HPV genotyping<br />
test (LA; Roche). Partially, histologic diagnoses were available.<br />
Results. In 1566 (87.9%) of the cases HPV results were concordant. Of the<br />
215 cases (12.1%) with discrepancies LA results are available in 214 cases.<br />
94 cases were LA-negative: 13 of 105 cobas-pos/HC2-neg and 81 of 99 cobas-neg/HC2-pos<br />
cases. 110 cases were LA-positive: 92 of 105 cobas-pos/<br />
HC2-neg and 18 of 99 cobas-neg/HC2-pos cases. 325 cases with histologically<br />
confirmed CIN2+ were included. In 261 out of 293 cases (89.1%)<br />
where a HC2 result was available this was positive, while 298 out of 318 of<br />
the cases (93.7%) tested with cobas HPV were positive. The rate of HPV<br />
positivity in cytologically normal cases and in HSIL was slightly higher<br />
with cobas HPV, while it was in the same range in ASC-US and in LSIL<br />
cases. With increasing severity of the cytologic findings the rate of HPV<br />
16- and 18 positivity increased proportionally.<br />
Conclusions. In routine specimens from a German commercial laboratory<br />
the cobas HPV test showed similar performance compared to the<br />
HC2 test. Preliminary data point to a potentially higher sensitivity and<br />
specificity with cobas HPV while adding information by HPV 16 and 18<br />
genotyping.<br />
SA-P-040<br />
Comparison of Abbott RealTime and HC2-HPV testing in a routine<br />
laboratory<br />
H . Ikenberg1 , C . Noppen2 , M . Faber1 , A . Xhaja1 , S . Böhm3 1 2 Cytomol, MVZ for Cytology and Molecular Biology, Frankfurt, Viollier AG,<br />
Basel, Switzerland, 3University Hospital Leipzig, Dep . for Gastroenterology<br />
and Rheumatology, Leipzig<br />
Aims. The Digene Hybrid Capture2 test (HC2, Qiagen, Hilden) is the<br />
standard in routine human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing. Several<br />
new test systems have become commercially available in the past years,<br />
among them the automated Abbott RealTime-High-Risk-HPV assay<br />
(RealTime-HPV, Abbott Molecular, Wiesbaden). It detects 14 HR-HPV<br />
types and simultaneously differentiates between HPV16, HPV18 and 12<br />
non-HPV16/18 HR types in a single test, while HC2 targets the same HR<br />
types, except HPV66, without typing. RealTime-HPV amplifies human<br />
β-globin in the same reaction. We evaluated RealTime-HPV versus HC2<br />
with cervical specimens from a large German routine laboratory sampled<br />
with the PreservCyt collection medium (Hologic, Frankfurt).<br />
Methods. 505 anonymized routine specimens referred for cytology and<br />
pretested with HC2 were run with RealTime-HPV on the m2000 System<br />
(Abbott). Samples with discordant results between both assays were genotyped<br />
by Linear Array (Roche, Mannheim), targeting 37 HPV genotypes.<br />
Results were correlated with routine histology available for 280 cases<br />
(16.8%