13.07.2013 Views

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts<br />

SA-P-008<br />

Correlation of anti-PHH3 positive mitoses to pathological response<br />

in neoadjuvantly treated breast cancer<br />

S . Timme 1 , M . Becker 2 , E . Stickeler 2 , P . Bronsert 1 , L . Reischuck 2 , L . Bogatyreva 3 ,<br />

D . Hauschke 3 , A . zur Hausen 4 , M . Werner 1<br />

1 Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center, Freiburg, 2 Department of<br />

Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg,<br />

3 Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical<br />

Center, Freiburg, 4 Department of Pathology, GROW, School for Oncology<br />

and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht,<br />

Netherlands<br />

Aims. We evaluated breast cancer (BC) core biopsies taken before neoadjuvant<br />

chemotherapy (NACT) by immunohistochemistry using anti-PhosphohistoneH3<br />

antibody (PHH3) to determine the mitotic count.<br />

The data were correlated to clinicopathological parameters including<br />

intrinsic subtypes as well as the histopathological regression of resected<br />

tumour specimens after NACT with Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide<br />

(EC) and Taxotere.<br />

Methods. 72 patients with either triple negative (21/72) or luminal type<br />

(51/72) BC obtained NACT with EC and Taxotere. Thereafter, tumour<br />

regression was analyzed in resection specimens using a semiquantitative<br />

score from 0 (no effect) to 4 (no cancer cells) according to Sinn et al.<br />

(1994). Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual<br />

invasive carcinoma (score 3+4). In 16/72 cases (22.2%) pCR occurred; 9/16<br />

(56.25%) were TNBC and 7/16 were luminal type BC (ER and/or PrR+/<br />

HER2−). In the pre-treatment biopsies immunohistochemical stainings<br />

with PHH3 were performed and mitotic figures were evaluated in 10 high<br />

power fields (HPF). The number of mitoses detected by PHH3 was correlated<br />

to different clinicopathological parameters determined before treatment<br />

(intrinsic subtype, WHO-type, grading, tumour size and nodal<br />

stage) and to regressive changes/pCR after therapy by univariate statistical<br />

analyzes (using SPSS v 18).<br />

Results. The number of PHH3-detected mitoses correlated significantly<br />

with the tumour grading (p=0.001), but there was no correlation with<br />

WHO-type, tumour size or nodal stage. PHH3/10 HPF differs significantly<br />

between the two intrinsic subtypes (p=0.003). PHH3 expression<br />

alone was no predictor for pCR (p=0.399). But tumours with 11 or<br />

more mitoses/10 HPF achieved significantly more often pCR than those<br />

with un<strong>der</strong> 11 mitoses/10 HPF (p=0.031). Furthermore, luminal type<br />

BC with 11 or more mitoses/10 HPF and also TNBC had significantly<br />

more frequent pCR than luminal type BC with un<strong>der</strong> 11 mitoses/10 HPF<br />

(p=0.016).<br />

Conclusions. Strong proliferating BC (11 or more mitoses/10 HPF) have<br />

significantly more pCR compared to low proliferating tumours (un<strong>der</strong><br />

11 mitoses/10 HPF) after NACT with EC and Taxotere. Furthermore,<br />

mitoses detected by PHH3 are a discriminator for luminal type BC to<br />

predict pCR, because luminal type BC un<strong>der</strong> 11 mitoses/10 HPF rarely<br />

reach pCR. Thus, the determination of mitoses by PHH3 may be recommended<br />

especially for luminal type BC before NACT with EC and<br />

Taxotere.<br />

SA-P-009<br />

Transitions between flat epithelial atypia and low-grade ductal<br />

carcinoma in situ of the breast<br />

S . Aulmann1 , F . Mietzsch1 , R . Penzel1 , P . Schirmacher1 , H .P . Sinn1 1University of Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg<br />

Aims. Flat epithelial atypia (FEA) of the breast typically is a localised alteration<br />

involving only few, neighbouring terminal ducto-lobular units<br />

(TDLUs). However, occasionally there are cases with extensive FEA and<br />

morphological evidence of direct transitions between FEA and classical<br />

ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).<br />

Methods. To investigate the relationship of FEA and DCIS in these cases,<br />

we microdissected multiple foci of the respective lesions in a series<br />

142 | Der Pathologe · Supplement 1 · 2012<br />

of 10 cases and performed comparative allelotyping using a panel of 14<br />

LOH markers. In addition, phylogenetic tree models were calculated on<br />

the basis of mitochondrial DNA sequencing to visualise the clonal relationship<br />

of the different lesions.<br />

Results. FEA and lg-DCIS shared the majority of chromosomal imbalances,<br />

loss of diverging alleles was not detected in any of the 10 cases.<br />

mtDNA sequencing and phylogenetic tree clustering revealed direct<br />

transitions between FEA and lg-DCIS in all 10 cases. However, in three<br />

patients, additional foci of FEA were present which were not directly related<br />

to the rest of the FEA and the lg-DCIS.<br />

Conclusions. In conclusion, our data demonstrate the presence of direct<br />

transitions between FEA and lg-DCIS and support the interpretation of<br />

foci of FEA as part of the lg-DCIS in those unusual cases in which multiple<br />

areas of FEA are interspersed with areas of classical lg-DCIS and<br />

direct transitions of both lesions are apparent.<br />

SA-P-010<br />

Different cytoplasmic and nuclear PARP expression patterns in<br />

hereditary and non-hereditary breast cancer<br />

M .-L . Klauke1 , N . Hoogerbrugge1 , J . Budczies2 , P . Bult1 , J .H .J . van Krieken1 ,<br />

C . Denkert2 , B .M . Müller2 1Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands,<br />

2Charité Hospital, Institute of Pathology, Berlin<br />

Aims. High cytoplasmic poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase<br />

(PARP) expression in non-hereditary breast cancer correlates with an<br />

aggressive tumor pattern and a poor long-term prognosis. Our study was<br />

designed to compare cytoplasmic and nuclear PARP expression between<br />

hereditary and non-hereditary breast cancer.<br />

Methods. Tissue micro arrays containing 39 familiar and 39 non-hereditary<br />

formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded breast cancer tumor samples<br />

were immunohistochemically analyzed for cytoplasmic (cPARP) and<br />

nuclear (nPARP) PARP expression. Stained slides were digitized and<br />

evaluated using the VM Slide Explorer. The intensity and percentage<br />

of positive tumor cells were used to calculate an immunoreactive score<br />

(IRS), which was divided into three subgroups defined as low (IRS 0–2),<br />

intermediate (IRS 3–4) and high (IRS 6–12) expression. The mean age at<br />

diagnosis in patients with familiar breast cancer was about 45±11 years<br />

and in patients with non-hereditary breast cancer about 65±12.1 years.<br />

Results. cPARP and nPARP expression patterns were significantly different<br />

in hereditary and non-hereditary breast cancer. cPARP expression<br />

in hereditary breast cancer was low in 33.3%, intermediate in 25.6% and<br />

high in 41.0% of cases. In contrast, cPARP in non-hereditary breast cancer<br />

was low in 59.0%, intermediate in 25.6% and high in 15.4% of cases.<br />

Statistical analysis showed that cPARP expression was significantly higher<br />

in hereditary compared to non-hereditary breast cancer (p=0.008,<br />

χ2-test for trends). Hereditary breast cancer showed a significant lower<br />

intermediate nPARP expression (23.1%) than non-hereditary breast cancer<br />

(59.0%; p=0.005, χ2-test).<br />

Conclusions. PARP expression in hereditary and non-hereditary breast<br />

cancer differs significantly, which might be related to the higher frequency<br />

of BRCA1 or 2 mutations in hereditary breast cancer and is compatible<br />

with a role of PARP-1 in DNA repair and genomic stability. Because patients<br />

with hereditary breast cancer have a poor long-term prognosis and<br />

show very often an aggressive tumor pattern the overall higher cPARP<br />

expression found in this subgroup suggests that high cPARP expression<br />

might be correlated with an aggressive tumor pattern and a poor longterm<br />

prognosis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!