13.07.2013 Views

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstracts<br />

SO-008<br />

KRAS mutational status is a prognostic biomarker in pancreatic<br />

ductal adenocarcinoma that is not influenced by p53 protein<br />

expression<br />

B .V . Sinn 1 , J .K . Striefler 2 , A . Lehmann 1 , M .A . Rudl 1 , M . Sinn 2 , A . Stenzinger 3 ,<br />

M . Bahra 4 , W . Weichert 3 , H . Riess 2 , M . Dietel 1 , C . Denkert 1<br />

1 Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institut <strong>für</strong> <strong>Pathologie</strong>, Berlin, 2 Charité<br />

Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie,<br />

Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Berlin, 3 Ruprecht-Karls-Universität<br />

Heidelberg, Institut <strong>für</strong> <strong>Pathologie</strong>, Heidelberg, 4 Charité Universitätsmedizin<br />

Berlin, Klinik <strong>für</strong> Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Berlin<br />

Aims. Mutations in the KRAS and p53 genes belong to the most frequently<br />

observed genetic alterations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma<br />

(PDAC). Whereas p53 protein expression is of no prognostic value in<br />

most studies, the prognostic role of KRAS mutational status remains<br />

controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the frequency and<br />

prognostic impact of KRAS mutations in patients with PDAC (study<br />

group; n=153). In addition, we attempted to define molecular subgroups<br />

with distinct biological behaviour by combined analysis of KRAS sequencing<br />

data with p53 protein expression data.<br />

Methods. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded<br />

tissue cores using a fully automated extraction method. Codons 12<br />

and 13 of the KRAS gene were sequenced using sanger sequencing technology<br />

(n=153). P53 immunostaining was performed on tissue microarrays<br />

from the same paraffin blocks. The impact of KRAS mutational<br />

status and nuclear p53 expression on patient outcome was evaluated.<br />

Results. KRAS mutations in codon 12 or 13 were found in 68% of cases.<br />

Nuclear positivity for p53 in at least 60% of tumor cells was observed in<br />

47% of cases. We found no statistically significant association between<br />

KRAS mutational status and nuclear p53 positivity. KRAS mutational<br />

status, but not p53 expression, was an independent prognostic marker in<br />

the study group (p=0.011). Subgrouping of patients in four groups according<br />

to KRAS status and p53 expression failed to define subgroups with<br />

distinct biological behaviour and could not stratify patients beyond the<br />

impact of KRAS mutational status.<br />

Conclusions. In line with in vitro and in vivo data, we could demonstrate<br />

that the KRAS mutational status plays a crucial role in pancreatic cancer<br />

biology. KRAS may serve as a prognostic marker and potentially as<br />

a predictive marker for targeted therapies. P53 could not contribute to<br />

stratification of patients according to survival.<br />

SO-009<br />

Collagen type V affects the tumour-stroma interaction in pancreatic<br />

cancer<br />

S . Berchtold1 , I . Esposito1 1Technische Universität München, Institute of Pathology, München<br />

Aims. Pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is characterized by a dense stroma sustaining<br />

the cancer cells. The aim of this study is to un<strong>der</strong>stand the role<br />

that collagen V (Col V) plays in the interaction between stromal and<br />

epithelial cells during the progression of PDAC.<br />

Methods. The expression of Col V was analysed in human PDAC, precursor<br />

lesions and PDAC cells by immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting,<br />

respectively. To study the influence of Col V on PDAC cells,<br />

in vitro assays (adhesion, migration, invasion, chemoresistance) were<br />

performed. Col V-dependent signalling pathways were investigated by<br />

immunoblotting and immunofluorescence. The impact of Col V on angiogenesis<br />

was verified by tube formation assay in Col V knocked-down<br />

HUVEC cells.<br />

Results. A progressively increasing stromal expression of Col V could be<br />

shown during cancer progression. Moreover, Col V significantly affected<br />

adhesion, migration, invasion and promoted chemoresistance of PDAC<br />

cells. Tube formation was impaired in Col V-deficient cells; however, no<br />

62 | Der Pathologe · Supplement 1 · 2012<br />

significant correlation between Col V expression and neoangiogenesis<br />

was found.<br />

Conclusions. The malignant phenotype of pancreatic cancer cells is enhanced<br />

by stromal Col V, potentially through activation of the integrin<br />

signalling pathway.<br />

Aktuelle Entwicklungen in <strong>der</strong> Forschung III –<br />

Translationale Forschung<br />

SO-010<br />

The expression CDK4 and MDM2 in lipomas may point to a progression<br />

to GI liposarcomas<br />

M . Haab1 , M . Buck1 , L . Flossbach1 , S . Brü<strong>der</strong>lein1 , A . von Baer2 , M . Schult heiss2 ,<br />

R . Mayer-Steinacker3 , M . Wittau4 , P . Möller1 , T .F . Barth1 1 2 Ulm University, Institute of Pathology, Ulm, Ulm University, University<br />

Hospital, Department for Orthopaedic Trauma, Hand- and Reconstructive<br />

Surgery, Ulm, 3Ulm University, University Hospital, Internal Medicine III, Ulm,<br />

4Ulm University, University Hospital, Department of General, Visceral and<br />

Transplantation Surgery, Ulm<br />

Aims. Lipomatous tumors have the potential to progress from benign<br />

lesions to liposarcomas. Our goal was to specify changes during progression<br />

to distinguish progressing neoplasms from entirely benign lesions.<br />

Methods. We analyzed 31 lipomas of different regions including subcutaneous<br />

and deeply localized lesions, 42 liposarcomas GI and 8 hibernomas<br />

by morphology, immunohistochemistry with antibodies for<br />

MDM2, CDK4 and FISH with probes for the MDM2- and CDK4-region.<br />

Included were one lipoma with a recurrence, two ipomas that progressed<br />

to a GI liposarcoma after 8 years and 6 years respectively as well as one<br />

retroperitoneal lipomatous tumor with a lipoma and GI and GIII liposarcoma<br />

components. Furthermore, we included two own liposarcoma<br />

cell lines (LISA1 and LISA2) <strong>der</strong>ived from dedifferentiated liposarcomas.<br />

Results. Of 31 lipomas 13 were CDK4+ and 8 were MDM2+ in various<br />

combinations. 19/19 showed no CDK4 aberration while two were amplified<br />

for MDM2. In GI liposarcomas 32/42 were CDK4+ and 31/42 were<br />

MDM2+. 9/13 GI sarcomas were amplified for CDK4 and 16/20 showed<br />

an amplification of MDM2. One/8 hibernoma each expressed MDM2<br />

and CDK4 while no genetic aberrations of CDK4 or MDM2 genomic<br />

regions were detected. One lipoma with progression to GI liposarcoma<br />

showed a neoexpression of CDK4 and acquired an amplification of<br />

CDK4 and MDM2 in the GI sarcoma; in the other one an additional amplification<br />

of MDM2 was found. In one retroperitoneal lipomatous tumor<br />

we detected a neoexpression of CDK4/MDM2 in the sarcoma with<br />

an increase in copy numbers for CDK4 and MDM2. The cell lines LISA1<br />

and LISA2 showed a heterogeneous expression of CDK4 and MDM2.<br />

Conclusions. The different patterns of CDK4 and MDM2 expression and<br />

gene amplifications in lipomas point to a progression to GI liposarcoma<br />

in morphologically unsuspicious tumors. Since hibernomas are generally<br />

negative for these markers they have different biology with no progression.<br />

LISA1 and LISA2 are in vitro models to functionally test the<br />

impact of CDK4 and MDM2 for the malignant phenotype. Immunohistochemistry<br />

and FISH-analysis for CDK4 and MDM2 may be crucial in<br />

lipomas for risk estimation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!