96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Abstracts<br />
FR-P-165<br />
Potential complications of aortic valve implantation via a transfemoral<br />
artery catheter: an autopsy perspective<br />
H . Löser 1 , H .P . Dienes 1 , J . Fries 1<br />
1 University of Cologne, Institute of Pathology, Köln<br />
Aims. Degenerative or post-endocarditic destruction of aortic valves<br />
with secondary left ventricular hypertension and subsequent cardiac insufficiency<br />
is seen more frequently in patients with increasing age. The<br />
instable health of many of these patients does not permit a removal of<br />
the diseased valve in an open surgical procedure. Instead, an aortic valve<br />
implantation is achieved via either a transapical access or a transfemoral<br />
artery catheter. In Cologne, the catheter carrying a ballon-expandable<br />
stent with a valve of bovine pericardium (Edwards-SAPIEN System) has<br />
been used for the last 3 years. While in the majority of cases this procedure<br />
was completed successfully, we encountered several autopsy cases,<br />
in which unforeseen complications occurred directly related to this type<br />
of valve replacement.<br />
Methods. All patients were in the age range of 65 to 80 years. Preclinical<br />
evaluation had indicated that a conventional surgical approach either by<br />
transsternal access or by intercostal/apical access would not be tolerated<br />
by the patient and an aortic valve implantation via transfemoral catheter<br />
using the Edwards-SAPIEN Systems was performed. Patients had died<br />
within hours of valve implantation and a full body autopsy was performed<br />
in each case once appropriate consent was given.<br />
Results. The observed complications had been: 1. irreversible compression<br />
of implanted valve due to cardiac resuscitation, 2. implantation of a<br />
small diameter valve not properly anchored due to excessive calcification<br />
with paravalvular leak, 3. loss of valve being dislodged before the aortic<br />
isthmus, 4. tilted implantation of valve due to calcifications of the aortic<br />
ring with pressure necrosis of aortic wall and paraaortic bleed, 5. transmural<br />
aortic rupture due to a calcified ring of the aortic valve after balloon<br />
dilatation with intramyocardial/pericardial bleeding leading to coronary<br />
compression with secondary hemorrhagic infarction.<br />
Conclusions. In all cases the preoperative lack of information of the degree<br />
of calcification of the aortic valve leaflets was a common denominator<br />
for postoperative complications. Future improvements of three<br />
dimensional imaging appear necessary to increase the chance of preventing<br />
such complications. Until then, autopsy analysis of complications<br />
may be the only way to detect potential weaknesses of an otherwise lifesaving,<br />
but high risk procedure.<br />
FR-P-166<br />
Situs inversus totalis of twins: an autopsy case report<br />
C . Tóth1 , M . Jäckel2 , K . Bartók2 1University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg,<br />
2Military Hospital, Budapest, Hungary<br />
Aims. Situs inversus totalis is a rare congenital abnormality resulting in<br />
visceral malrotation of the internal organs leading to left-right asymmetry.<br />
In certain cases it is associated with clinically defined syndromes e.g.<br />
Kartagener’s syndrome. In the case presented after 9 attempts of in vitro<br />
fertilization and reduction (from three embryos to two embryos) in the<br />
20th gestation week cesarean section was performed because of acute<br />
purulent chorioamnitis with spontaneous rupture of membranes.<br />
Methods. The medical history of the mother included primary sterility<br />
with 9-times in vitro fertilization with F II 20210 heterozigosity and<br />
MFHFR polymorphism with homozigosity. Further, factor Xa thrombophily<br />
was also in her family diagnosed. After the operation the placenta<br />
and two fetus were macroscopically and histologically examined.<br />
Results. Placenta: 390 g with intact two amnoitic sacs with two umbilical<br />
cords with central origin and three blood vessels (2 arteries and 1 vein).<br />
The cut surface of the placenta shows some grayish areals, the rest is normal.<br />
Fetus A: 304 g, 22 cm long male fetus. Ventricular and ependymal<br />
bleeding in the 4th ventricle. In the thorax the heart apex lies on the<br />
136 | Der Pathologe · Supplement 1 · 2012<br />
right side, the left lung consists of 3 lobes, the right one consists of 2.<br />
The cut heart and the great blood vessels run according to a total situs<br />
inversus situation. In the abdomen after removing a blood clot normal<br />
developed organs with total malrotation can be found. The pelvis organs<br />
macroscopically show no abnormality. Fetus B is a 297 g, 23 cm female<br />
fetus with some petechial skin bleedings. The central nervous system has<br />
no abnormalities. The thoracal and abdominal organs show the same<br />
malrotational changes as described above at fetus A. The changes were<br />
photographically documented.<br />
Conclusions. The cause of spontaneous abortion was an acute purulent<br />
chorioamnitis due to a probably ascending infection which caused the<br />
spontaneous rupture of the membrane. The autopsy cannot explore the<br />
cause of infection. Both of the autopsied fetus showed the rare malrotation<br />
changes, the situs inversus totalis without any other developmental<br />
disturbances. In the daily autopsy practice we need to know about these<br />
rare changes which are important not only in fetopathology but in anatomical<br />
pathology as well.<br />
FR-P-167<br />
Analysis and appraisal of the clinical autopsy results of a surgically<br />
oriented cardiac center in terms of quality assurance<br />
J . Grüning1 , R . Meyer1 , M . Dietel2 , R . Hetzer1 1 2 Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Charité, Humboldt-University in<br />
Berlin/ Institute for Anatomic Pathology, Berlin<br />
Aims. We aimed to analyze the quality of clinicopathologic documentation<br />
and communication. Concentrating on the following two questions:<br />
1.) How valuable are the medical documentation of the inspection of the<br />
corpse (post-mortem/clinical autopsy) and the content of the autopsy<br />
requests and are they adequate for a qualified-autopsy? 2.) Are the autopsy<br />
findings and examinations in line with the quality requirements<br />
of a cardiac center?<br />
Methods. Between 2000 and 2009 an average autopsy rate of 37% of all<br />
decedents (range, 28% to 45%) was reached at our institute. During that<br />
time 1063 decedents un<strong>der</strong>went autopsy. In accordance with the above<br />
objectives the following were analyzed and assessed: documentation of<br />
the inspection of the corpse (causal chain of the causes of death; personal<br />
data; formalities), content of the autopsy requests (clinical procedures),<br />
autopsy reports (date of autopsy; date of compilation of the autopsy report<br />
and granting of access for the clinician have been recorded). The clinical<br />
and autopsied un<strong>der</strong>lying diseases and causes of death were coded<br />
in accordance with ICD 10.<br />
Results. It was evaluated as positive that documentation of the inspection<br />
of the corpse, content of the autopsy requests and the autopsy reports<br />
themselves are in correct form. Also positive is, that the recorded autopsy<br />
results are discussed during weekly medical meetings at the institution.<br />
Regrettably, however, the pathologists do not participate in these<br />
meetings. The fact that the majority of autopsy reports do not reach the<br />
clinician until after 30 days is a serious problem precluding their prompt<br />
evaluation and discussion. The clinicians and pathologists need to change<br />
for the better communication in relation to analyzing and assessing<br />
the autopsies. There have been discrepancies between the clinically determined<br />
causes of death and the autopsy causes of death. In particular<br />
the clinically determined cause of death of “sepsis” needs to be discussed.<br />
The preparation of the autopsy reports has no real influence on the<br />
hospital’s cost accounting (DRG).<br />
Conclusions. It becomes apparent that the autopsy report constitutes an<br />
effective tool for quality assurance. The weekly medical meeting is a suitable<br />
forum to look at quality assurance issues. The quantity and quality<br />
of the communication between clinician and pathologist leave room for<br />
improvement and strengthening.