13.07.2013 Views

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abstracts<br />

FR-P-165<br />

Potential complications of aortic valve implantation via a transfemoral<br />

artery catheter: an autopsy perspective<br />

H . Löser 1 , H .P . Dienes 1 , J . Fries 1<br />

1 University of Cologne, Institute of Pathology, Köln<br />

Aims. Degenerative or post-endocarditic destruction of aortic valves<br />

with secondary left ventricular hypertension and subsequent cardiac insufficiency<br />

is seen more frequently in patients with increasing age. The<br />

instable health of many of these patients does not permit a removal of<br />

the diseased valve in an open surgical procedure. Instead, an aortic valve<br />

implantation is achieved via either a transapical access or a transfemoral<br />

artery catheter. In Cologne, the catheter carrying a ballon-expandable<br />

stent with a valve of bovine pericardium (Edwards-SAPIEN System) has<br />

been used for the last 3 years. While in the majority of cases this procedure<br />

was completed successfully, we encountered several autopsy cases,<br />

in which unforeseen complications occurred directly related to this type<br />

of valve replacement.<br />

Methods. All patients were in the age range of 65 to 80 years. Preclinical<br />

evaluation had indicated that a conventional surgical approach either by<br />

transsternal access or by intercostal/apical access would not be tolerated<br />

by the patient and an aortic valve implantation via transfemoral catheter<br />

using the Edwards-SAPIEN Systems was performed. Patients had died<br />

within hours of valve implantation and a full body autopsy was performed<br />

in each case once appropriate consent was given.<br />

Results. The observed complications had been: 1. irreversible compression<br />

of implanted valve due to cardiac resuscitation, 2. implantation of a<br />

small diameter valve not properly anchored due to excessive calcification<br />

with paravalvular leak, 3. loss of valve being dislodged before the aortic<br />

isthmus, 4. tilted implantation of valve due to calcifications of the aortic<br />

ring with pressure necrosis of aortic wall and paraaortic bleed, 5. transmural<br />

aortic rupture due to a calcified ring of the aortic valve after balloon<br />

dilatation with intramyocardial/pericardial bleeding leading to coronary<br />

compression with secondary hemorrhagic infarction.<br />

Conclusions. In all cases the preoperative lack of information of the degree<br />

of calcification of the aortic valve leaflets was a common denominator<br />

for postoperative complications. Future improvements of three<br />

dimensional imaging appear necessary to increase the chance of preventing<br />

such complications. Until then, autopsy analysis of complications<br />

may be the only way to detect potential weaknesses of an otherwise lifesaving,<br />

but high risk procedure.<br />

FR-P-166<br />

Situs inversus totalis of twins: an autopsy case report<br />

C . Tóth1 , M . Jäckel2 , K . Bartók2 1University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg,<br />

2Military Hospital, Budapest, Hungary<br />

Aims. Situs inversus totalis is a rare congenital abnormality resulting in<br />

visceral malrotation of the internal organs leading to left-right asymmetry.<br />

In certain cases it is associated with clinically defined syndromes e.g.<br />

Kartagener’s syndrome. In the case presented after 9 attempts of in vitro<br />

fertilization and reduction (from three embryos to two embryos) in the<br />

20th gestation week cesarean section was performed because of acute<br />

purulent chorioamnitis with spontaneous rupture of membranes.<br />

Methods. The medical history of the mother included primary sterility<br />

with 9-times in vitro fertilization with F II 20210 heterozigosity and<br />

MFHFR polymorphism with homozigosity. Further, factor Xa thrombophily<br />

was also in her family diagnosed. After the operation the placenta<br />

and two fetus were macroscopically and histologically examined.<br />

Results. Placenta: 390 g with intact two amnoitic sacs with two umbilical<br />

cords with central origin and three blood vessels (2 arteries and 1 vein).<br />

The cut surface of the placenta shows some grayish areals, the rest is normal.<br />

Fetus A: 304 g, 22 cm long male fetus. Ventricular and ependymal<br />

bleeding in the 4th ventricle. In the thorax the heart apex lies on the<br />

136 | Der Pathologe · Supplement 1 · 2012<br />

right side, the left lung consists of 3 lobes, the right one consists of 2.<br />

The cut heart and the great blood vessels run according to a total situs<br />

inversus situation. In the abdomen after removing a blood clot normal<br />

developed organs with total malrotation can be found. The pelvis organs<br />

macroscopically show no abnormality. Fetus B is a 297 g, 23 cm female<br />

fetus with some petechial skin bleedings. The central nervous system has<br />

no abnormalities. The thoracal and abdominal organs show the same<br />

malrotational changes as described above at fetus A. The changes were<br />

photographically documented.<br />

Conclusions. The cause of spontaneous abortion was an acute purulent<br />

chorioamnitis due to a probably ascending infection which caused the<br />

spontaneous rupture of the membrane. The autopsy cannot explore the<br />

cause of infection. Both of the autopsied fetus showed the rare malrotation<br />

changes, the situs inversus totalis without any other developmental<br />

disturbances. In the daily autopsy practice we need to know about these<br />

rare changes which are important not only in fetopathology but in anatomical<br />

pathology as well.<br />

FR-P-167<br />

Analysis and appraisal of the clinical autopsy results of a surgically<br />

oriented cardiac center in terms of quality assurance<br />

J . Grüning1 , R . Meyer1 , M . Dietel2 , R . Hetzer1 1 2 Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Charité, Humboldt-University in<br />

Berlin/ Institute for Anatomic Pathology, Berlin<br />

Aims. We aimed to analyze the quality of clinicopathologic documentation<br />

and communication. Concentrating on the following two questions:<br />

1.) How valuable are the medical documentation of the inspection of the<br />

corpse (post-mortem/clinical autopsy) and the content of the autopsy<br />

requests and are they adequate for a qualified-autopsy? 2.) Are the autopsy<br />

findings and examinations in line with the quality requirements<br />

of a cardiac center?<br />

Methods. Between 2000 and 2009 an average autopsy rate of 37% of all<br />

decedents (range, 28% to 45%) was reached at our institute. During that<br />

time 1063 decedents un<strong>der</strong>went autopsy. In accordance with the above<br />

objectives the following were analyzed and assessed: documentation of<br />

the inspection of the corpse (causal chain of the causes of death; personal<br />

data; formalities), content of the autopsy requests (clinical procedures),<br />

autopsy reports (date of autopsy; date of compilation of the autopsy report<br />

and granting of access for the clinician have been recorded). The clinical<br />

and autopsied un<strong>der</strong>lying diseases and causes of death were coded<br />

in accordance with ICD 10.<br />

Results. It was evaluated as positive that documentation of the inspection<br />

of the corpse, content of the autopsy requests and the autopsy reports<br />

themselves are in correct form. Also positive is, that the recorded autopsy<br />

results are discussed during weekly medical meetings at the institution.<br />

Regrettably, however, the pathologists do not participate in these<br />

meetings. The fact that the majority of autopsy reports do not reach the<br />

clinician until after 30 days is a serious problem precluding their prompt<br />

evaluation and discussion. The clinicians and pathologists need to change<br />

for the better communication in relation to analyzing and assessing<br />

the autopsies. There have been discrepancies between the clinically determined<br />

causes of death and the autopsy causes of death. In particular<br />

the clinically determined cause of death of “sepsis” needs to be discussed.<br />

The preparation of the autopsy reports has no real influence on the<br />

hospital’s cost accounting (DRG).<br />

Conclusions. It becomes apparent that the autopsy report constitutes an<br />

effective tool for quality assurance. The weekly medical meeting is a suitable<br />

forum to look at quality assurance issues. The quantity and quality<br />

of the communication between clinician and pathologist leave room for<br />

improvement and strengthening.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!