13.07.2013 Views

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FR-P-136<br />

The expression of central cell cycle regulators in non-small cell<br />

lung cancer (NSCLC) has therapy dependent prognostic impact<br />

J . Cortis 1 , A . Warth 1 , M . Meister 2 , T . Muley 2 , H . Hoffmann 3 , A . Stenzinger 1 ,<br />

P .A . Schnabel 1 , P . Schirmacher 1 , W . Weichert 1<br />

1 University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg,<br />

2 Thoracic Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 3 Thoracic Hospital Heidelberg,<br />

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Heidelberg<br />

Aims. The relevance of function and expression of central cell cycle regulators<br />

in NSCLC has been discussed for years with controversial and<br />

non-conclusive results. To address this topic, we evaluated expression<br />

patterns of central cell cycle regulators in a very large NSCLC cohort<br />

with the goal to ultimately clarify their clinical-prognostic role.<br />

Methods. Expression of the G1-phase cell cycle regulators CDK4, cyclin<br />

D1 and p16 were analysed by immunhistochemical staining and quantitative<br />

evaluation on tissue microarrays comprising 1045 completely<br />

resected NSCLC. The data were correlated with clinical-pathological<br />

factors, patients’ survival and response to therapy.<br />

Results. Loss of expression of CDK4 (p=0.017), cyclin D1 (p=0.001) and<br />

p16 (p=0.039) were associated with higher UICC stages. In general, high<br />

expression of all cell cycle regulators was associated with better clinical<br />

outcome in a slightly variable way, depending on protein and prognostic<br />

parameter investigated [CDK4, overall survival (OS): p=0.457, disease<br />

specific survival (DSS): p=0.110, disease free survival (DFS): p=0.011;<br />

cyclin D1, OS: p=0.037, DSS: p=0.009, DFS: p=0.111; p16, OS: p=0.204,<br />

DSS: p=0.484, DFS: p=0.004]. These effects were prominent in adenocarcinomas,<br />

adenosquamous carcinomas and in pleomorphic carcinomas,<br />

but less pronounced in squamous cell carcinomas. Interestingly, after<br />

stratification for therapy, the positive association of protein overexpression<br />

with survival was only seen in adenocarcinomas without adjuvant<br />

radio- and chemotherapy whereas the association in tumors with adjuvant<br />

irradiation and chemotherapy was switched in the opposite direction.<br />

Conclusions. The expression of CDK4, cyclin D1 and p16 in NSCLC has<br />

prognostic impact depending on therapy. High expression of all three<br />

proteins was associated with improved clinical outcome in completely<br />

resected NSCLC without adjuvant therapy.<br />

FR-P-137<br />

The FUSE-binding proteins (FBPs) represent essential regulators<br />

responsible for tumor cell proliferation, migration and invasion in<br />

non-small cell lung cancer<br />

M . Malz1 , M . Bovet1 , J . Samarin1 , E . Herpel1 , A . Warth1 , S . Singer1 , T . Muley2 ,<br />

M . Meister2 , H . Hoffmann2 , P . Schnabel1 , P . Schirmacher1 , K . Breuhahn1 1University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg,<br />

2University Hospital Heidelberg, Thoracic Hospital, Heidelberg<br />

Aims. The single-strand nucleic acid binding far upstream element (FU-<br />

SE)-binding proteins (FBP)-1, FBP-2, and FBP-3 represent a multifunctional<br />

protein family, regulating transcriptional and post-transcriptional<br />

processes as well as microRNA biogenesis. Elevated expression and<br />

pro-tumorigenic functions of all FBPs have been described for human<br />

liver cancer. Moreover first data indicated that FBP-1 affects microtubule<br />

dynamics through regulation of MT-destabilizing factors in non-small<br />

cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore we aimed to analyze expression and<br />

functional relevance of FBPs in NSCLC.<br />

Methods. The expression of FBPs was analyzed at the transcript (qPCR)<br />

and protein level (Tissue Microarrays [TMA], Western Blotting) in primary<br />

human NSCLC tissue samples. Using gene-specific siRNAs the<br />

expression of FBPs was inhibited in different NSCLC cell lines (Calu-1,<br />

Calu-6, and A549). Functional consequences of reduced protein expression<br />

on viability (MTT-Assay), proliferation (BrdU-Assay), apoptosis<br />

(FACS-Assay; PARP-cleavage), migration (two-dimensional scratch assay),<br />

and invasion (sprouting assay) were analyzed.<br />

Results. The expression of FBP-1 and FBP-2 was significantly elevated in<br />

human NSCLCs (>60%) in comparison to non-tumorous specimens. In<br />

vitro, transient inhibition of FBP-1 in NSCLC cells (Calu-6) was associated<br />

with decreased tumor cell viability (−76%), proliferation (−83%),<br />

and increased apoptosis (2.8-fold). In contrast, transient inhibition of<br />

FBP-2 predominantly reduced tumor cell migration (−62%) and tumor<br />

cell invasion (−81%), suggesting that both FBP isoforms facilitate distinct<br />

tumor-supporting effects. In addition, FBP-2 inhibition increased FBP-1<br />

expression at the transcript and protein level in A549 cells, demonstrating<br />

that FBP-1 may compensate the loss of FBP-2. Accordingly, the FBP-<br />

1/-2 double-knockdown led to a significant reduction of cell viability<br />

(−69%).<br />

Conclusions. In summary, this study provides evidence that overexpression<br />

of FBP-1 and FBP-2 is frequently detectable in NSCLC tissues and<br />

that both proteins are essential factors for tumor growth and NSCLC<br />

cell dissemination. Furthermore FBP-2 negatively regulates FBP-1 expression,<br />

indicating a functional compensation.<br />

FR-P-138<br />

Interobserver variability in the application of the novel IASLC/<br />

ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinomas<br />

A . Warth1 , A . Stenzinger1 , A .-C . von Brünneck2 , B . Goeppert1 , J . Cortis1 ,<br />

I . Petersen3 , P .A . Schnabel1 , W . Weichert1 1University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute for Pathology, Heidelberg,<br />

2Charité University Hospital Berlin, Institute for Pathology,<br />

3University Hospital Jena, Institute for Pathology<br />

Aims. Recently, an international consensus classification for adenocarcinomas<br />

(ADC) of the lung has been published. The cornerstone of this<br />

new classification is the quantification of different growth patterns. However,<br />

data on the reproducibility performance of this classification in<br />

the routine diagnostic setting are lacking.<br />

Methods. We selected 100 constitutive cases of conventional lung ADC<br />

resection specimens from our archives. All tumor slides were classified<br />

independently by five experienced pulmonary pathologists from three<br />

institutions and by two pathologists in training according to the recommendations<br />

of the IASLC/ATS/ERS.<br />

Results. The most frequent predominant pattern in our cohort was solid<br />

(37%), followed by acinar (35%), lepidic (20%), papillary (5%) and micropapillary<br />

(3%). kappa values for the denomination of a predominant<br />

pattern revealed a substantial agreement for pulmonary pathologists<br />

(0.44—0.72) but only fair agreement for pathologists in training (0.38–<br />

0.47). Interobserver variability was significantly higher in cases with higher<br />

slide numbers (p=0.028) and was consi<strong>der</strong>ably reduced in a second<br />

evaluation round after the initiation of a training session. Intraobserver<br />

variability was low (kappa=0.79–0.87). Papillary and micropapillary patterns<br />

were the most complicated patterns to evaluate, while evaluation of<br />

lepidic and solid tumor growth was straightforward. The acinar pattern<br />

ranged in between.<br />

Conclusions. Our data imply that the novel classification of pulmonary<br />

ADC is applicable with adequate interobserver variability if performed<br />

by specifically trained pathologists. However, additional efforts are needed<br />

to harmonize the application of this novel and clinically important<br />

classification scheme of pulmonary ADC.<br />

Der Pathologe · Supplement 1 · 2012 |<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!