96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FR-P-136<br />
The expression of central cell cycle regulators in non-small cell<br />
lung cancer (NSCLC) has therapy dependent prognostic impact<br />
J . Cortis 1 , A . Warth 1 , M . Meister 2 , T . Muley 2 , H . Hoffmann 3 , A . Stenzinger 1 ,<br />
P .A . Schnabel 1 , P . Schirmacher 1 , W . Weichert 1<br />
1 University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg,<br />
2 Thoracic Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 3 Thoracic Hospital Heidelberg,<br />
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Heidelberg<br />
Aims. The relevance of function and expression of central cell cycle regulators<br />
in NSCLC has been discussed for years with controversial and<br />
non-conclusive results. To address this topic, we evaluated expression<br />
patterns of central cell cycle regulators in a very large NSCLC cohort<br />
with the goal to ultimately clarify their clinical-prognostic role.<br />
Methods. Expression of the G1-phase cell cycle regulators CDK4, cyclin<br />
D1 and p16 were analysed by immunhistochemical staining and quantitative<br />
evaluation on tissue microarrays comprising 1045 completely<br />
resected NSCLC. The data were correlated with clinical-pathological<br />
factors, patients’ survival and response to therapy.<br />
Results. Loss of expression of CDK4 (p=0.017), cyclin D1 (p=0.001) and<br />
p16 (p=0.039) were associated with higher UICC stages. In general, high<br />
expression of all cell cycle regulators was associated with better clinical<br />
outcome in a slightly variable way, depending on protein and prognostic<br />
parameter investigated [CDK4, overall survival (OS): p=0.457, disease<br />
specific survival (DSS): p=0.110, disease free survival (DFS): p=0.011;<br />
cyclin D1, OS: p=0.037, DSS: p=0.009, DFS: p=0.111; p16, OS: p=0.204,<br />
DSS: p=0.484, DFS: p=0.004]. These effects were prominent in adenocarcinomas,<br />
adenosquamous carcinomas and in pleomorphic carcinomas,<br />
but less pronounced in squamous cell carcinomas. Interestingly, after<br />
stratification for therapy, the positive association of protein overexpression<br />
with survival was only seen in adenocarcinomas without adjuvant<br />
radio- and chemotherapy whereas the association in tumors with adjuvant<br />
irradiation and chemotherapy was switched in the opposite direction.<br />
Conclusions. The expression of CDK4, cyclin D1 and p16 in NSCLC has<br />
prognostic impact depending on therapy. High expression of all three<br />
proteins was associated with improved clinical outcome in completely<br />
resected NSCLC without adjuvant therapy.<br />
FR-P-137<br />
The FUSE-binding proteins (FBPs) represent essential regulators<br />
responsible for tumor cell proliferation, migration and invasion in<br />
non-small cell lung cancer<br />
M . Malz1 , M . Bovet1 , J . Samarin1 , E . Herpel1 , A . Warth1 , S . Singer1 , T . Muley2 ,<br />
M . Meister2 , H . Hoffmann2 , P . Schnabel1 , P . Schirmacher1 , K . Breuhahn1 1University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg,<br />
2University Hospital Heidelberg, Thoracic Hospital, Heidelberg<br />
Aims. The single-strand nucleic acid binding far upstream element (FU-<br />
SE)-binding proteins (FBP)-1, FBP-2, and FBP-3 represent a multifunctional<br />
protein family, regulating transcriptional and post-transcriptional<br />
processes as well as microRNA biogenesis. Elevated expression and<br />
pro-tumorigenic functions of all FBPs have been described for human<br />
liver cancer. Moreover first data indicated that FBP-1 affects microtubule<br />
dynamics through regulation of MT-destabilizing factors in non-small<br />
cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore we aimed to analyze expression and<br />
functional relevance of FBPs in NSCLC.<br />
Methods. The expression of FBPs was analyzed at the transcript (qPCR)<br />
and protein level (Tissue Microarrays [TMA], Western Blotting) in primary<br />
human NSCLC tissue samples. Using gene-specific siRNAs the<br />
expression of FBPs was inhibited in different NSCLC cell lines (Calu-1,<br />
Calu-6, and A549). Functional consequences of reduced protein expression<br />
on viability (MTT-Assay), proliferation (BrdU-Assay), apoptosis<br />
(FACS-Assay; PARP-cleavage), migration (two-dimensional scratch assay),<br />
and invasion (sprouting assay) were analyzed.<br />
Results. The expression of FBP-1 and FBP-2 was significantly elevated in<br />
human NSCLCs (>60%) in comparison to non-tumorous specimens. In<br />
vitro, transient inhibition of FBP-1 in NSCLC cells (Calu-6) was associated<br />
with decreased tumor cell viability (−76%), proliferation (−83%),<br />
and increased apoptosis (2.8-fold). In contrast, transient inhibition of<br />
FBP-2 predominantly reduced tumor cell migration (−62%) and tumor<br />
cell invasion (−81%), suggesting that both FBP isoforms facilitate distinct<br />
tumor-supporting effects. In addition, FBP-2 inhibition increased FBP-1<br />
expression at the transcript and protein level in A549 cells, demonstrating<br />
that FBP-1 may compensate the loss of FBP-2. Accordingly, the FBP-<br />
1/-2 double-knockdown led to a significant reduction of cell viability<br />
(−69%).<br />
Conclusions. In summary, this study provides evidence that overexpression<br />
of FBP-1 and FBP-2 is frequently detectable in NSCLC tissues and<br />
that both proteins are essential factors for tumor growth and NSCLC<br />
cell dissemination. Furthermore FBP-2 negatively regulates FBP-1 expression,<br />
indicating a functional compensation.<br />
FR-P-138<br />
Interobserver variability in the application of the novel IASLC/<br />
ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinomas<br />
A . Warth1 , A . Stenzinger1 , A .-C . von Brünneck2 , B . Goeppert1 , J . Cortis1 ,<br />
I . Petersen3 , P .A . Schnabel1 , W . Weichert1 1University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute for Pathology, Heidelberg,<br />
2Charité University Hospital Berlin, Institute for Pathology,<br />
3University Hospital Jena, Institute for Pathology<br />
Aims. Recently, an international consensus classification for adenocarcinomas<br />
(ADC) of the lung has been published. The cornerstone of this<br />
new classification is the quantification of different growth patterns. However,<br />
data on the reproducibility performance of this classification in<br />
the routine diagnostic setting are lacking.<br />
Methods. We selected 100 constitutive cases of conventional lung ADC<br />
resection specimens from our archives. All tumor slides were classified<br />
independently by five experienced pulmonary pathologists from three<br />
institutions and by two pathologists in training according to the recommendations<br />
of the IASLC/ATS/ERS.<br />
Results. The most frequent predominant pattern in our cohort was solid<br />
(37%), followed by acinar (35%), lepidic (20%), papillary (5%) and micropapillary<br />
(3%). kappa values for the denomination of a predominant<br />
pattern revealed a substantial agreement for pulmonary pathologists<br />
(0.44—0.72) but only fair agreement for pathologists in training (0.38–<br />
0.47). Interobserver variability was significantly higher in cases with higher<br />
slide numbers (p=0.028) and was consi<strong>der</strong>ably reduced in a second<br />
evaluation round after the initiation of a training session. Intraobserver<br />
variability was low (kappa=0.79–0.87). Papillary and micropapillary patterns<br />
were the most complicated patterns to evaluate, while evaluation of<br />
lepidic and solid tumor growth was straightforward. The acinar pattern<br />
ranged in between.<br />
Conclusions. Our data imply that the novel classification of pulmonary<br />
ADC is applicable with adequate interobserver variability if performed<br />
by specifically trained pathologists. However, additional efforts are needed<br />
to harmonize the application of this novel and clinically important<br />
classification scheme of pulmonary ADC.<br />
Der Pathologe · Supplement 1 · 2012 |<br />
127