13.07.2013 Views

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

96. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie e. V ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DNA damage, and cytotoxic drugs. Autophagy dysregulation is associated<br />

with a number of disease states, including cancer. Autophagy plays<br />

different roles during the initiation and progression of cancer. While<br />

autophagy acts as a tumor suppressor during the initiation phase of cancer,<br />

it promotes tumor progression and metastasis in established cancers.<br />

Metastatic cancer cells that usually grow in a nutrient-poor microenvironment<br />

utilize autophagy to fulfil their high metabolic demand. Autophagy<br />

can facilitate survival during anchorage-independent growth<br />

or anoikis, and promotes therapeutic resistance. Furthermore, recent<br />

studies indicated that genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of autophagy<br />

sensitized tumor cells to anti-cancer treatment. It is therefore important<br />

to study the role of autophagy and its regulations in cancer cells, which<br />

will help defining optimal strategies to modulate autophagy for therapeutic<br />

advantage.<br />

VO-038<br />

Markers of autophagy in cancer<br />

M . Mu<strong>der</strong>s1 1University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the University of Dresden,<br />

Institute of Pathology, Dresden<br />

Autophagy has been implicated in cancer progression and therapy resistance.<br />

Accordingly, different methods to identify and quantify autophagy<br />

in tissue samples and cell culture models will be applied more frequently.<br />

The traditional way to visualize autophagy at the ultrastructural<br />

level is electron microscopy. Electron microscopy has the ability to detect<br />

important structures that are involved during lysosomal degradation of<br />

organelles like autophagosomes. Easier and more cost effective is the immunohistochemical<br />

detection of autophagy substrates like LC3 or p62.<br />

In addition, proteins involved in autophagy like Beclin-1 could serve as<br />

an indicator of autophagy. In cell culture models, functional studies like<br />

detection of autophagic flux as well as long-lived protein degredation are<br />

used to monitor autophagic activity. However, all methods have their limitations<br />

and should be applied only after careful consi<strong>der</strong>ation of their<br />

strengths and weaknesses.<br />

Translationale Forschung und Diagnostik –<br />

Mamma/Schilddrüse/Melanom<br />

VO-039<br />

Translationale Forschung und Diagnostik: Karzinome <strong>der</strong> Schilddrüse<br />

A . Perren1 , A .M . Schmitt 1 , M . Dettmer2 1 2 Institut <strong>für</strong> <strong>Pathologie</strong>, Bern, Switzerland, University of Pittsburgh, Department<br />

of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States<br />

Histopathology and treatment of thyroid carcinomas poses several challenges:<br />

On a diagnostic level there is a group of tumors difficult (or impossible)<br />

to classify as benign or malignant, more importantly, the 10%<br />

of patients that cannot be cured by surgery and radio-iodine treatment<br />

is difficult to predict. The grey zone of follicular thyroid tumors of unknown<br />

malignant potential and morphological criteria of an adverse<br />

outcome (poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas and tall-cell papillary<br />

thyroid carcinomas) will be discussed.<br />

On a molecular level, well differentiated thyroid carcinomas are well<br />

classified and the genetic basis is well known, however genetic events<br />

during carcinoma progression are less well un<strong>der</strong>stood. The most important<br />

genetic changes helping diagnosis, determination of prognosis<br />

will be discussed. Their role in guiding future targeted therapy will have<br />

to be shown in clinical trials.<br />

VO-040<br />

Translational research and diagnostics: Melanoma<br />

J . Rüschoff and Panel Members of DGP/BDP BRAF Testing Ring Study 1<br />

1<strong>Pathologie</strong> Nordhessen<br />

Most recently the first molecularly defined targeted therapy in metastatic<br />

and/or irresectable melanoma has been approved by EMA (20.2.2012).<br />

Vemurafinib (Zelburaf) is a small molecule that selectively inhibits BRAF<br />

kinase in its mutated form. About 50% of metastatic melanoma exhibit<br />

mutations within the BRAF oncogene almost exclusively at codon V600<br />

activating the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signal transduction pathway. About<br />

90% of mutations lead to an exchange of valin and glutamate (V600E).<br />

Within a large phase III clinical trial (BRIM3) median survival of Vemurafinib<br />

treated patients was 5.3 months instead of 1.6 months after chemotherapy<br />

with response rates of 48.4% versus 5.5%, respectively (Chapman<br />

PB et al. NEJM 2011; Sosman JA et al. NEJM 2012).<br />

In light of these data mutation testing of BRAF is becoming standard<br />

of care in malignant melanoma. This raises the question about testing<br />

methods and quality assurance. A working group of the DGP and BDP<br />

has addressed these aspects by performing a ring study where 9 Institutes<br />

of Pathology together with their clinical colleagues participated.<br />

Recommendations of testing and evaluation have been determined and<br />

a QUIP-based approach of quality assurance will be available in 04/2012<br />

headed by the Universities of Heidelberg and Berlin [1]. Sensitivity and<br />

specificity of testing platforms (Sanger-, Pyro-, 454-Sequencing, real-time-PCR-based<br />

cobas® 4800) will be discussed together with the need of<br />

a strict tissue based approach making use of tumor cell enrichment, e.g.<br />

by microdissection.<br />

In addition to BRAF testing in melanomas further mutation analyses<br />

will be needed, e.g. of NRAS and CKIT, where targeted drugs are either<br />

available (CKIT) or un<strong>der</strong> development (NRAS). Potential impact of<br />

new targeted drugs on testing probably in specific tumor subtypes such<br />

as acral or mucosal melanoma will be discussed.<br />

References<br />

1 . Panel Members: M . Dietel (Berlin), A . Enk (Heidelberg), A . Lehmann (Berlin),<br />

J .N . Bauer (Tübingen), C . Garbe (Tübingen), U . Kellner (Minden), T . Kirchner<br />

(München), A . Jung (München), H . Kreipe (Hannover), S . Merkelbach-Bruse<br />

(Köln), R . Büttner (Köln), W . Schlake (Gelsenkirchen), P . Schirmacher (Heidelberg),<br />

R . Stadler (Minden) als Verfasser entsprechen<strong>der</strong> Ankündigungspublikationen in<br />

JDDG und Der Pathologe, eingereicht 2012 .<br />

Ausgewählte Vorträge aus den Einsendungen<br />

(Hauptprogramm und Arbeitsgemeinschaften)<br />

AG Gastroenteropathologie I – Leber<br />

DO-001a<br />

miR-101 is involved in steatosis and steatohepatitis of Non-<br />

Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)<br />

K .S . Ommer1 , N . Elfimova1 , A . Noetel1 , H .-P . Dienes1 , M . Odenthal1 ,<br />

N . Winkler 2 , M . Quasdorff2 , I . Strack1 , J . Riemer1 1 2 University Hospital of Cologne, Institute for Pathology, Köln, University<br />

Hospital of Cologne, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Köln<br />

Aims. The Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is a rising widespread<br />

disease. Frequently, steatosis results in steatohepatitis (NASH),<br />

however the factors, responsible for inflammatory progression, are yet<br />

unknown. Since previous profiling studies have pointed to miR-101 as<br />

a candidate involved in steatohepatitis, we have studied the role of miR-<br />

101.<br />

Der Pathologe · Supplement 1 · 2012 |<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!