19.07.2013 Views

Volume 13 Number 1 - University of the Philippines College of Law

Volume 13 Number 1 - University of the Philippines College of Law

Volume 13 Number 1 - University of the Philippines College of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

330<br />

National Administrative Register <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>13</strong>/1<br />

WHEREAS, it has been brought to <strong>the</strong> attention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Board that some municipal<br />

zoning ordinances have used <strong>the</strong> term ìdeferred land useî as one classification <strong>of</strong> land uses<br />

within <strong>the</strong>ir respective municipalities;<br />

WHEREAS, <strong>the</strong> term, being unconventional, <strong>the</strong>re arose some issues as to <strong>the</strong><br />

classification <strong>of</strong> lands within <strong>the</strong> said zone;<br />

WHEREAS, <strong>the</strong> initial efforts by <strong>the</strong> Legal Services Group (LSG) <strong>of</strong> this Board tried to<br />

define <strong>the</strong> above-stated term relating <strong>the</strong> same to ìtransition zonesî as defined by HLURB<br />

Board Resolution No. 558, Series <strong>of</strong> 1994;<br />

WHEREAS, it has become imperative to come up with a uniform definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term<br />

ìdeferred land useî to be utilized by all municipalities across <strong>the</strong> country in <strong>the</strong>ir ìmunicipal<br />

zoning ordinances;î<br />

WHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that <strong>the</strong> term<br />

DEFERRED LAND USE ZONE/CLASSIFICATION, shall mean a non-built-up area, whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

agricultural or o<strong>the</strong>rwise, which has been classified as urban but its actual use has been<br />

deferred in <strong>the</strong> meantime, PROVIDED, <strong>the</strong> land is a potential urbanizable area and/or suitable<br />

for urban use and not within restricted areas as defined by existing laws.<br />

For your information and guidance.<br />

Adopted: 20 July 2001<br />

Date Filed: 08 March 2002<br />

(SGD.) ROMULO Q.M. FABUL<br />

Commissioner and Chief Executive Officer<br />

--o0o--<br />

HLURB Memorandum Circular No. 37, s. 2001<br />

Resolution No. R-696, s. 2001, Consolidating and Taking Cognizance<br />

<strong>of</strong> All Cases on Appeal to <strong>the</strong> Board Arising from <strong>the</strong> Cherry Hills Incident<br />

Quoted hereunder is <strong>the</strong> subject resolution approved by <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Commissioners<br />

on 18 June 2001:<br />

WHEREAS, <strong>the</strong> Board is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> opinion that <strong>the</strong> cases arising from <strong>the</strong> Cherry<br />

Hills incident filed by <strong>the</strong> homeowners against PHILJAS CORP., <strong>the</strong> subdivision<br />

developer, are impressed with significant public interest and involve grave and<br />

critical policy issues that warrant immediate resolution by <strong>the</strong> Board;<br />

WHEREFORE, RESOLVED, as it is hereby RESOLVED, that <strong>the</strong> Board en<br />

banc, pursuant to Rule XVII, Section 2(3) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> HLURB Rules <strong>of</strong> Procedure as<br />

amended by Resolution No. 655, S. 1999, consolidate and take cognizance <strong>of</strong> all<br />

<strong>the</strong> cases on appeal to <strong>the</strong> Board arising from <strong>the</strong> Cherry Hills incident.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!