19.07.2013 Views

DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SEVERANCE <strong>OF</strong> RELATIONS WITH AUSTRIA-HUNGARY. 437<br />

Minister for Foreign Affairs understands that, in view o/<br />

the declarations made by the Imperial and Royal Government<br />

on February 10, 1916, and January 31, 1917,<br />

the Washington Cabinet is in doubt as to the attitude<br />

which Austria-Hungary intends to adopt from now on in<br />

the conduct of the submarine warfare, and whether the<br />

assurance given by the Imperial and Royal Government<br />

to the Washington Cabinet in the course of negotiations<br />

in the cases of the ships Ancona and Persia has not<br />

perhaps been altered or withdrawn by the aforesaid<br />

declarations.<br />

The Imperial and Royal Government is willingly ready<br />

to comply with the wish of the American Government<br />

that these doubts be removed by a definite and clear<br />

statement.<br />

The Austro-Hungarian Government may be permitted,<br />

in the first place, in all brevity to discuss the methods<br />

practiced by the Entente Powers in the conduct of naval<br />

warfare, because these methods constitute the point of<br />

departure of the more severe submarine warfare put into<br />

operation by Austria-Hungary and her allies, and because<br />

thereby the attitude which the Imperial and Royal Government<br />

has so far adopted in the questions arising therefrom<br />

is elucidated.<br />

When Great Britain entered into war against the Central<br />

Powers, only a few years had elapsed since that<br />

memorable time when she, in common with the other<br />

states, had, at The Hague, begun to lay down the fundaments<br />

of a modern law of maritime warfare; soon thereafter<br />

the English Government had assembled in London<br />

representatives of the great naval powers to complete<br />

The Hague work, principally in the sense of an equitable<br />

settlement between the interests of belligerents and neutrals.<br />

The nations were not long to enjoy the unanticipated<br />

successes of these efforts, which accomplished<br />

nothing less than an agreement upon a code which was<br />

suitable to give validity to the principle of the freedom of<br />

the sea and the interests of neutrals even in time of war.<br />

The United Kingdom had hardly decided to participate<br />

in the war before it began to break through the bounds<br />

placed upon it by the code of international law. While<br />

the Central Powers immediately at the beginning of the<br />

war had declared their intention of adhering to the<br />

Declaration of London, which also bore the signature of<br />

the British delegate, England cast aside the most important<br />

provisions of this declaration. In the endeavor to<br />

cut the Central Powers off from importation by sea, Great<br />

Britain extended the list of contraband step by step until<br />

it included everything now required for supporting human<br />

life. Then Great Britain laid over the coasts of the<br />

North Sea, which also constitute an important transit<br />

gate for the sea commerce of Austria-Hungary, a closure<br />

which she designated as a "blockade" in order to prevent<br />

the entrance into Germany of all goods still lacking in<br />

the list of contraband, as well as to stop all sea traffic of<br />

neutrals with those coasts and to prevent all exportation<br />

whatsoever from them. That this closure stands in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!