27.07.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lood cell mass and decrease in urine volume in animals given 30% Solutol/70%<br />

PEG 400 at a dose volume <strong>of</strong> 5 mL/kg/day was likely due to dehydration and hemoconcetration<br />

associated with the loose/watery feces. Neither 10% Solutol/90%<br />

PEG 400 or 30% Solutol/70% PEG 400 at either dose volume produced overt toxicity<br />

after 28 days <strong>of</strong> dosing, however using the lower dose volume <strong>of</strong> 2 mL/kg/day<br />

minimized the incidence <strong>of</strong> loose/watery feces and potential dehydration.<br />

782 TOXICITY OF MDL72, 527 ADMINISTERED ORALLY<br />

TO RATS AND DOGS.<br />

S. D. Grimes 1 , R. W. Watkins 1 , J.F.Mann 1 , H. S. Basu 2 , I. M. Kapetanovic 3<br />

and C. D. Hebert 1 . 1 Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL, 2 Colby<br />

Pharmaceutical Company, Menlo Park, CA and 3 National Cancer Institute,<br />

Bethesda, MD.<br />

MDL72,527 is a polyamine oxidase inhibitor that is being developed as a potential<br />

chemotherapeutic agent for prostate cancer. <strong>The</strong> toxicity <strong>of</strong> MDL72,527 was evaluated<br />

in Sprague Dawley rats and beagle dogs. Rats were given MDL72,527 via<br />

gavage at doses <strong>of</strong> 0, 25, 75, 250, or 1000 mg/kg/day daily for up to 14 days or at<br />

doses <strong>of</strong> 0, 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg/day MDL72,527 once every 14 days for 71<br />

days. Initially, dogs were to be given daily doses <strong>of</strong> MDL72,527 via capsules at<br />

doses <strong>of</strong> 0, 50, 200, or 1000 mg/kg/day for 14 consecutive days. However, because<br />

<strong>of</strong> intolerance to MDL72,527 at higher doses, dogs in the 200 and 1000<br />

mg/kg/day dose groups were dosed for only 7 and 5 days, respectively. Dogs in the<br />

50 mg/kg/day dose group received this dose on Days 1-7, with an increase to 100<br />

mg/kg/day on Days 8-14. Adverse effects associated with giving MDL72,527 daily<br />

to rats and dogs included unscheduled mortality, clinical signs <strong>of</strong> toxicity, decreases<br />

in body weight and food consumption, clinical pathology abnormalities, and extensive<br />

microscopic lesions. Excluding a thin carcass in one dog, no test article-related<br />

gross lesions were observed in rats and dogs given MDL72,527. Microscopic<br />

lesions in dogs and rats receiving MDL72,527 daily were multisystemic, consisting<br />

<strong>of</strong> cytoplasmic vacuolization <strong>of</strong> numerous tissues, particularly the vasculature.<br />

Animals given MDL72,527 once every 14 days had minimal test article-related<br />

clinical signs, clinical pathology abnormalities, and microscopic lesions (apoptosis).<br />

Extreme toxicity was associated with daily oral administration <strong>of</strong> MDL72,527.<br />

Administration <strong>of</strong> the drug every 14 days for 71 days appeared to mitigate adverse<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> the drug at doses where the drug is active in preventing cancer progression<br />

in a mouse spontaneous prostate cancer model. A no-observed-adverse effect level<br />

was not established for rats or dogs on the dosing schedules used in these studies.<br />

Funded with federal funds from National Cancer Institute Contract<br />

HHSN26120043307C<br />

783 SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF PHOSPHO-IBUPROFEN AS A<br />

POTENTIAL CANCER CHEMOPREVENTIVE AGENT.<br />

R. W. Watkins 1 , J. F. Mann 1 , S. D. Grimes 1 , R. Fulton 2 , C. V. Rao 3 , I. M.<br />

Kapetanovic 4 and C. D. Hebert 1 . 1 Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL,<br />

2 FVClinPath Consulting, Birmingham, AL, 3 University <strong>of</strong> Oklahoma Health Sciences<br />

Center, Oklahoma City, OK and 4 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.<br />

Phospho-ibupr<strong>of</strong>en (pIB) is being evaluated for use as a cancer chemopreventive<br />

agent, and is believed to have lower toxicity and greater chemopreventive potency<br />

than ibupr<strong>of</strong>en itself. To assess the toxicity and pharmacokinetic behavior <strong>of</strong> pIB in<br />

rats, two studies were performed in which Sprague Dawley rats received daily oral<br />

gavage doses <strong>of</strong> pIB at 0, 25, 50, 150, or 450 mg/kg/day for 14 days or 0, 20, 100,<br />

or 500 mg/kg/day for 28 days. One rat died in the high dose group <strong>of</strong> each study.<br />

Administration <strong>of</strong> 150 or 450 mg/kg/day produced minimal clinical signs and minimal<br />

changes in neutrophil, globulin, and albumin values. In the 14-day study, a<br />

no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) dose was not identified. pIB metabolites<br />

in plasma included R- and S-ibupr<strong>of</strong>en, hydroxyphospho-ibupr<strong>of</strong>en, 1- and 2-hydroxyibupr<strong>of</strong>en,<br />

and ibupr<strong>of</strong>en glucuronide. In the 28-day study, there were no<br />

clinical signs <strong>of</strong> toxicity attributed to pIB administration. Rats in the two highest<br />

dose groups had minimal (≤10%) deficits in body weight gain and food consumption<br />

compared to controls. Clinical pathology alterations in leukocytes (high leukocytes,<br />

neutrophils, and monocytes), serum protein (low total protein, albumin, and<br />

albumin/globulin) and/or high fibrinogen values observed for rats in the two highest<br />

dose groups were consistent with inflammatory and necrotic effects observed in<br />

various tissues <strong>of</strong> animals in this study, as well as with the known toxic effects <strong>of</strong><br />

ibupr<strong>of</strong>en. Microscopic lesions consistent with ibupr<strong>of</strong>en toxicity were observed in<br />

the glandular stomach, forestomach, large intestine, kidney, and liver <strong>of</strong> pIB-treated<br />

rats. Based on microscopic changes observed in the gastrointestinal tract and kidney<br />

at the 20 mg/kg/day dose level, a NOAEL dose was not identified for rats dosed<br />

with pIB daily for 28 days.<br />

Funded wholly with federal funds from National Cancer Institute Contract<br />

HHSN26120043307C<br />

784 EARLY SAFETY ASSESSMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND<br />

STRATEGIES IN DRUG DISCOVERY.<br />

S. Mohr 1 , A. J. Olaharski 2 , F. Crameri 1 , T. Singer 1 and T. Weiser 1 . 1 Nonclinical<br />

Safety, F. H<strong>of</strong>fmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland and 2 Nonclinical Safety, F.<br />

H<strong>of</strong>fmann-La Roche, Nutley, NJ.<br />

<strong>The</strong> likelihood that a new chemical entity progresses through the pre-clinical stages<br />

to market is very low. While there are many factors that contribute to the failure <strong>of</strong><br />

developing novel pharmaceuticals, one <strong>of</strong> the largest has historically been due to<br />

safety. Because drug failures are tremendously expensive, both in terms <strong>of</strong> time and<br />

money, a number <strong>of</strong> strategies have been developed to reduce attrition.<br />

Traditionally, non clinical safety representation within Roche began once a clinical<br />

lead had been selected and safety studies to support entry into human were<br />

planned. This process resulted in a large number <strong>of</strong> unexpected toxicities observed<br />

during the first repeat dose safety studies and a high attrition rate. Approximately 5<br />

years ago, an early safety representative (ESR) group was formed to provide active<br />

safety support to project teams during all the early drug discovery phases (from target<br />

assessment to clinical lead selection). One area <strong>of</strong> focus has been in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

a thorough early safety target assessment which provides a non-clinical safety<br />

(NCS) functional opinion on the potential safety liabilities, strategies to adress<br />

these liabilities and an assessment <strong>of</strong> whether the putative target should be pursued.<br />

Additionally, a number <strong>of</strong> in silico, in vitro and in vivo mechanistic/ranking approaches<br />

are specifically applied to better select drug candidates. This philosophy is<br />

conceptually very simple; reduce compound attrition through proactive and collaborative<br />

safety representation at earlier phases <strong>of</strong> drug discovery, identifying potential<br />

target-related safety liabilities during target assessment and the generation <strong>of</strong> more<br />

predictive safety data during the lead optimization phase prior to clinical lead selection.<br />

Specific examples <strong>of</strong> how this approach has been applied within Roche will be<br />

provided. Using this approach, Roche was able to markedly reduce the safety-related<br />

attrition <strong>of</strong> the selected clinical leads .<br />

785 ASSESSMENT OF HEMATOLOGICAL TOXICITY<br />

ASSOCIATED WITH COMBINING CLASSICAL<br />

CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AND TARGETED CANCER<br />

DRUGS.<br />

S. Khoh-Reiter, D. Lee and B. Jessen. Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA.<br />

In the past standard treatment for cancer was chemotherapy. While effective in<br />

combating cancer, there are <strong>of</strong>ten undesirable side-effects with hematological adverse<br />

effects being the most common. In an attempt to decrease the toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

<strong>of</strong> the treatments, rationally designed drugs or targeted therapies are being developed,<br />

such as kinase inhibitors. Another approach undertaken by oncologists is<br />

combining more than one drug to treat the cancers, aptly called combination therapy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to propose a predictive method for determining<br />

the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> combining classical chemotherapy and a targeted therapy on<br />

bone marrow cells. <strong>The</strong> ability to know whether the effects <strong>of</strong> combining drugs will<br />

produce a synergistic, additive or similar toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile as the monotherapies will<br />

provide invaluable data for patient treatment plans. Five compounds, three <strong>of</strong><br />

which are kinase inhibitors, Sorafenib, Imatinib and a CHK-1 compound; a taxane,<br />

Paclitaxel; and a classical nucleoside analog, Gemcitabine were tested using differentiated<br />

in vitro human bone marrow mononuclear cells, which can give rise to<br />

various hematopoietic lineages. Dose-dependent decrease in cell viability in the<br />

progenitor population was determined using cellular ATP as the biomarker. A synergistic<br />

response was obtained through the combination <strong>of</strong> Gemcitabine and the<br />

CHK-1 compound. In the Sorafenib-Paclitaxel combination, an additive decrease<br />

in the cell viability was observed compared to the treatments <strong>of</strong> the single therapies<br />

alone. To a much lesser extend, Gemcitabine combined with Sorafenib or Imatinib<br />

did not produce an additive response. In summary, these results demonstrate the<br />

feasibility <strong>of</strong> using human bone marrow mononuclear cells to test different combination<br />

therapies for oncology and can subsequently be used as a research tool for<br />

predicting neutropenia for various single or combination therapies for either developing<br />

compounds or established therapies.<br />

786 HUMAN NON-RELEVANCE OF MOTILIN AGONIST<br />

INDUCED ANAPHYLACTOID REACTIONS IN<br />

BEAGLE DOGS.<br />

P. Chowdhury and C. Powell. Safety Assessment, GlaxoSmithKline, Ware, United<br />

Kingdom.<br />

Background: Toxicities in animals must be assessed for human relevance.<br />

GSK962040 & GSK1322888 (MW 461 & 434, respectively) are motilin receptor<br />

agonists, in development as gastric prokinetics. Methods: Single oral doses <strong>of</strong><br />

GSK962040 were given to beagle dogs or Göttingen minipigs. Daily oral doses <strong>of</strong><br />

SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING 169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!