The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology
The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology
The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NPC and sinonasal cancer in neighboring tissues <strong>of</strong> the URT and other sites <strong>of</strong> first<br />
contact with inhaled exposure, these collective results support a broader pattern <strong>of</strong><br />
carcinogenicity within the URT.<br />
1947 EVIDENCE-BASED ANALYSIS DEFINING A<br />
FORMALDEHYDE VAPOR CONCENTRATION NOEL<br />
FOR IRRITANT RESPONSES IN HUMANS.<br />
J. K. Britt 1 , N. Halmes 2 , B. Kerger 3 and R. C. James 1 . 1 TERRA, Inc., Tallahassee,<br />
FL, 2 Halmes & Associates, Centennial, CO and 3 HSRI, Inc., Tallahassee, FL.<br />
<strong>The</strong> available scientific literature contains a broad range <strong>of</strong> human studies suggesting<br />
a range <strong>of</strong> levels at which formaldehyde may begin to induce eye or upper respiratory<br />
irritation. This study attempts to resolve the current uncertainty by an<br />
analysis derived via methods developed for reaching an evidence-based medical/toxicological<br />
conclusion. A literature search was conducted to identify all potentially<br />
relevant studies. <strong>The</strong> literature has shown that subjective symptoms <strong>of</strong> irritation are<br />
affected by mood (negative affect), the individual’s pre-conceived or naïve interpretation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the possible hazard associated with an odor, and that eye irritation is the<br />
most sensitive endpoint. Studies were rated and ranked according to preselected experimental<br />
design components that included these considerations. Studies that inadequately<br />
addressed certain rating components were eliminated altogether. Not<br />
surprisingly, experimental studies with carefully controlled exposures, using physiologic<br />
responses to derive objective measurements, and carefully controlled for confounding<br />
ranked and rated the highest and provided the best available evidence.<br />
<strong>The</strong> present evidence-based analysis identified a NOEL for eye irritation <strong>of</strong> 0.6<br />
ppm formaldehyde and a LOEL <strong>of</strong> 1.0 ppm with a unidentified threshold falling<br />
somewhere between these two levels. If subjective symptom measurements, which<br />
comprised the majority <strong>of</strong> the studies, were considered separately, and a well tolerated<br />
subjective interpretation <strong>of</strong> the exposure was the desired measurement outcome<br />
then a somewhat higher level near 1.0 ppm would represent the likely No<br />
Observable Adverse Effect Level.<br />
1948 WEIGHT-OF-EVIDENCE EVALUATION OF A<br />
PLAUSIBLE MODE OF ACTION FOR<br />
LEUKEMOGENESIS FROM INHALATION EXPOSURE<br />
TO FORMALDEHYDE.<br />
L. Bailey, A. K. Hamade and L. R. Rhomberg. Gradient, Cambridge, MA.<br />
We conducted a weight-<strong>of</strong>-evidence evaluation to assess the plausibility <strong>of</strong> three<br />
modes <strong>of</strong> action that have been proposed for formaldehyde (FA) leukemogenesis: 1)<br />
FA directly targeting bone marrow; 2) FA targeting nasal stem cells in the nasal-associated<br />
lymphoid tissue (NALT); or 3) FA targeting circulating hematopoietic<br />
stem cells (HSC), with later incorporation <strong>of</strong> nasal stem cells or HSCs into bone<br />
marrow. We determined whether the concentrations <strong>of</strong> FA that would be necessary<br />
to exceed endogenous levels in tissue are relevant to typical human exposures, and<br />
whether these concentrations would cause irritation. We determined whether the<br />
available evidence is consistent with FA-induced genotoxicity directly in the bone<br />
marrow, NALT, or circulating HSCs, and whether the types <strong>of</strong> DNA damage observed<br />
in FA genotoxicity studies are consistent with typical DNA damage associated<br />
with leukemias. And finally, we examined the likelihood that damaged circulating<br />
stem cells home back to healthy bone marrow to induce leukemia. We found<br />
that under typical human exposure concentrations, FA’s reactivity precludes its<br />
movement past the immediate respiratory epithelia following inhalation, precluding<br />
its ability to cause DNA damage in the NALT or circulating HSCs. We found<br />
that higher FA exposures (necessary to exceed endogenous levels) would likely be<br />
associated with a high degree <strong>of</strong> irritation. We found these results to be consistent<br />
with our further observation that cytogenetic effects typically reported in support<br />
<strong>of</strong> potential distant-site FA toxicity were inconsistent, potentially confounded by<br />
other exposures, not specific to leukemias, and typically reported in human peripheral<br />
blood lymphocytes which should not be presumed to equate with circulating<br />
HSCs. Finally, we found that there are many questions regarding HSC homing to<br />
bone marrow under homeostatic conditions. We conclude that the current weight<br />
<strong>of</strong> evidence, considering metabolism, distribution, genotoxicity, and HSC homing<br />
provides little support for the proposed modes <strong>of</strong> action for FA leukemogenesis.<br />
1949 DOES FORMALDEHYDE CAUSE HEMATOTOXICITY? A<br />
WEIGHT-OF-EVIDENCE EVALUATION OF<br />
HEMATOTOXICITY STUDIES IN HUMANS AND<br />
ANIMALS IN THE CONTEXT OF LEUKEMOGENICITY.<br />
A. Hamade, L. A. Bailey and L. R. Rhomberg. <strong>Toxicology</strong>, Gradient, Cambridge, MA.<br />
We conducted a weight-<strong>of</strong>-evidence evaluation to assess the plausibility <strong>of</strong> recently<br />
proposed hypotheses that suggested potential hematotoxic and leukemogenic properties<br />
for formaldehyde. First, we evaluated studies in humans that assessed hema-<br />
tology outcomes in subjects occupationally exposed to formaldehyde. We found no<br />
indication from these studies that formaldehyde is hematotoxic. Some studies have<br />
shown some evidence <strong>of</strong> changes in hematology in occupationally exposed populations;<br />
however, not all details <strong>of</strong> these studies are available, the studies provide<br />
mixed evidence <strong>of</strong> effects, and some studies report statistically significant outcomes<br />
even at concentrations that may be exceeded in some public spaces. Even when<br />
some studies show evidence <strong>of</strong> hematology changes, the changes are not clinically<br />
significant and may be explained by mechanisms independent <strong>of</strong> bone marrow toxicity.<br />
Second, we evaluated hematotoxicity studies in animals. We found generally<br />
no convincing evidence that formaldehyde, even at very high exposure concentrations,<br />
could cause hematotoxicity. Moreover, our evaluation revealed that animal<br />
studies do not show evidence <strong>of</strong> leukemia induction by formaldehyde exposure, a<br />
conclusion that seriously weakens the argument for its induction in humans. Only<br />
one study reports formaldehyde-associated leukemia in animals, and this study has<br />
serious faults that discredit its outcomes. Third, we examined the hematotoxic effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> established leukemogens, such as benzene and cyclophosphamide, and<br />
found that these agents invariably induce bone marrow toxicity and hematotoxicity,<br />
suggesting that if formaldehyde causes leukemia in humans, it is likely independent<br />
<strong>of</strong> hematotoxicity, which would be inconsistent with any mechanism currently<br />
known for leukemogenesis. In conclusion, we did not find convincing evidence<br />
that formaldehyde is hematotoxic in animals or humans.<br />
1950 IS MTBE GENOTOXIC OR MUTAGENIC?<br />
M. Seeley, L. A. Beyer and B. D. Beck. Gradient Corporation, Cambridge, MA.<br />
Due to prior use as a fuel oxygenate, methyl-tert-butyl-ether (MTBE) has been<br />
found in groundwater, where it presents a concern for potential human health risks,<br />
primarily cancer. <strong>The</strong>re is no evidence that MTBE causes cancer in humans.<br />
Increased cancer incidence has been observed in several animal cancer bioassays,<br />
but only at exposure levels several orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude greater than potential exposures<br />
to MTBE in groundwater. <strong>The</strong> mode-<strong>of</strong>-action and nature <strong>of</strong> the dose-response<br />
for MTBE carcinogenesis is currently a matter <strong>of</strong> scientific debate, with important<br />
ramifications for establishing permissible concentrations <strong>of</strong> MTBE in<br />
groundwater. Key to that debate is whether MTBE is genotoxic or mutagenic, in<br />
that evidence <strong>of</strong> mutagenicity would be potentially supportive <strong>of</strong> a no threshold<br />
dose-response model. We therefore conducted a weight-<strong>of</strong>-evidence analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
MTBE genotoxicity assays, including those from both published studies, and unpublished<br />
studies discussed in regulatory documents. We identified 13 in vivo and<br />
28 in vitro assays, including mutagenicity assays (24) as well as “indicator” assays<br />
(17) (i.e. tests, such as sister chromatid exchange assays, that reflect genotoxicity,<br />
but do not confirm mutagenicity). Importantly, none <strong>of</strong> the in vivo, and only one<br />
in vitro mutagenicity assay yielded a positive result with MTBE; subsequent evaluations<br />
indicate this result was due to exogenous formation <strong>of</strong> formaldehyde, specific<br />
to the conditions <strong>of</strong> the in vitro assay, rather than intrinsic mutagenicity <strong>of</strong> MTBE.<br />
Based on a critical analysis <strong>of</strong> the 12 indicator assays that provided some evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
DNA damage under certain conditions, we identified important limitations for<br />
these assays, including minimal nature <strong>of</strong> the response, lack <strong>of</strong> a clear dose-response,<br />
problems with study design, methodological issues, as well as differences<br />
between in vitro and in vivo metabolism <strong>of</strong> MTBE. We conclude that the weight <strong>of</strong><br />
the evidence indicates that MTBE is unlikely to be genotoxic or mutagenic. Thus<br />
margins-<strong>of</strong>-exposure analyses are more appropriate than linear no-threshold models<br />
for use in quantification <strong>of</strong> MTBE cancer risks<br />
1951 METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER (MTBE): TWO-<br />
YEAR DRINKING WATER STUDY IN WISTAR RATS.<br />
E. Bermudez 1 , D. K. Layko 1 , G. A. Willson 2 and D. E. Dodd 1 . 1 <strong>The</strong> Hamner<br />
Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC and 2 Experimental<br />
Pathology Laboratories, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC .<br />
To improve the human health risk assessment <strong>of</strong> MTBE in drinking water, male<br />
and female Wistar rats (50/sex/group) were exposed to drinking water, ad libitum,<br />
containing various concentrations <strong>of</strong> MTBE, 7 d/wk, for 2 yr. MTBE drinking<br />
water concentrations were 0 (control), 0.5, 3, and 7.5 mg/mL for male rats, and 0,<br />
0.5, 3, and 15 mg/mL for female rats. Endpoints included clinical observations,<br />
body weights, food and water consumption, gross necropsy, organ weights, and tissue<br />
histopathology. Body weights and food consumption were unaffected by exposure,<br />
but water consumption was reduced in all MTBE-exposed groups (e.g., 77,<br />
71 and 69% <strong>of</strong> the control for the 0.5, 3 and 7.5 mg/mL male groups, respectively).<br />
Statistical analyses <strong>of</strong> animal survival indicated no differences in survival between<br />
control and MTBE groups. Following 24 months <strong>of</strong> MTBE exposure, statistically<br />
significant increases in left and right kidney weights were observed in male and female<br />
rats <strong>of</strong> all MTBE exposure groups. Microscopically, a statistically significant<br />
increase in the incidence and severity <strong>of</strong> chronic progressive nephropathy (CPN), a<br />
SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING 417