The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology
The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology
The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
model <strong>of</strong> APAP metabolism and glutathione depletion has been used to investigate<br />
the extent to which differences in metabolism and glutathione homeostasis explain<br />
interspecies differences in susceptibility to APAP toxicity. As compounds with other<br />
modalities <strong>of</strong> DILI are added to the platform, the resulting model will serve as a<br />
flexible biosimulation platform to enhance drug development by quickly identifying<br />
drug candidates that are likely to be associated with idiosyncratic hepatic toxicity,<br />
and to guide personalized medicine by determining patient characteristics associated<br />
with a greater likelihood <strong>of</strong> adverse liver responses.<br />
1736 DEFINING SYSTEMS BIOLOGY IN A MODE-OF-<br />
ACTION CONTEXT.<br />
S. Edwards. U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are many competing definitions for the term systems biology with much <strong>of</strong><br />
the ambiguity originating from the revolution in molecular biology techniques at<br />
the turn <strong>of</strong> the century. <strong>The</strong> sequencing <strong>of</strong> the human genome and advent <strong>of</strong> techniques<br />
for monitoring transcripts, proteins, and metabolites on a global scale<br />
opened the door for a new world <strong>of</strong> molecular systems biology. In this new era,<br />
most definitions <strong>of</strong> systems biology contain most (if not all) <strong>of</strong> the following elements:<br />
global measurements <strong>of</strong> biological molecules to the extent technically feasible,<br />
dynamic measurements <strong>of</strong> key biological molecules to establish quantitative relationships<br />
among them, and experimental designs which perturb the system in<br />
specific ways to determine these relationships. This presentation will discuss how<br />
this these components can be used to develop a model for disease based on an interconnected<br />
network <strong>of</strong> molecular, cellular, and organism-level events. <strong>The</strong>se disease<br />
networks can then serve as the framework for a network-based description <strong>of</strong><br />
mode <strong>of</strong> action. Approaching the problem from this perspective provides a biologically-based<br />
mechanism for incorporating other factors affecting risk such as genetic<br />
susceptibility, life stage, and pre-existing diseases. It also enhances the ability <strong>of</strong><br />
more traditional biological modeling approaches to lay the groundwork for toxicity<br />
pathway-based risk assessment. <strong>The</strong> approach will be illustrated using examples<br />
from both human health and ecological research. [This abstract does not necessarily<br />
reflect the view <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Protection Agency.]<br />
1737 PHARMGKB: THE PHARMCOGENOMICS<br />
KNOWLEDGE BASE.<br />
T. E. Klein. Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford,<br />
CA. Sponsor: L. Burgoon.<br />
<strong>The</strong> mission <strong>of</strong> the PharmGKB is to collect, encode, and disseminate knowledge<br />
about how human genetic variation affects drug response. Established in 2000,<br />
PharmGKB has become the pre-eminent resource for pharmacogenomics information.<br />
It was one <strong>of</strong> the first “post-genome” resources with information about both<br />
genotype and phenotype, and has now become a focal point for data sharing. Via<br />
literature review, the PharmGKB team curates primary data, and annotates gene<br />
variants and gene-drug-disease relationships, <strong>The</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> genotype, phenotype,<br />
and drug pathways allows for a systems level analysis and hypothesis generation<br />
on new gene-drug interactions and effects.<br />
1738 THE INTERSECTOME: INTEGRATION OF<br />
KNOWLEDGE IN SYSTEMS BIOLOGY FOR<br />
HYPOTHESIS GENERATION.<br />
A. Ma’ayan. Pharmacology and Systems <strong>The</strong>rapeutics, Mount Sinai School <strong>of</strong><br />
Medicine, New York, NY. Sponsor: L. Burgoon.<br />
I will discuss how we utilize data collected from the public domain, describing regulatory<br />
interactions in mammalian cells, to analyze results from experiments that<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile cells using a variety <strong>of</strong> cutting edge genome-wide pr<strong>of</strong>iling technologies. <strong>The</strong><br />
results from our analyses produce rational hypotheses for further experimental validation<br />
as well as provide a global view <strong>of</strong> cell regulation across multiple layers.<br />
Specifically, I will show GATE, a program we developed for the analysis <strong>of</strong> time-series<br />
expression data used to analyze stem cell differentiation. I will also demonstrate<br />
Genes2Networks a program we developed and used to predict components and<br />
pathways essential for CB1R induced neurite outgrowth <strong>of</strong> Neuro2A cells.<br />
Genes2Networks was also used to predict a novel disease gene that causes Noonan<br />
syndrome. Finally, I will discuss our tools KEA for the analysis <strong>of</strong> SILAC phosphoproteomics,<br />
and ChEA for the analysis <strong>of</strong> gene expression data using a ChIP-X<br />
database. I will conclude with a proposition <strong>of</strong> ideas about developing robust theoretical<br />
models for candidate drug/gene/protein rankings for functional experimental<br />
validation.<br />
1739 INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF DISTINCT MOLECULAR<br />
AND PHENOTYPIC DATA TYPES IN XENOBIOTIC<br />
RESPONSE MODELING.<br />
R. J. Brennan. <strong>Toxicology</strong>, GeneGo Inc., San Jose, CA.<br />
Signaling and metabolic pathways acting within and between cells in an organism<br />
may be considered as integrated circuits working to maintain cell growth or homeostasis<br />
based on inputs from external influences and other, connected pathways.<br />
<strong>The</strong> components <strong>of</strong> these circuits comprise DNA, RNA, proteins, enzymatic activities,<br />
small molecules, ions etc., and in order to fully understand the circuit, or to<br />
“reconstruct the system” it is necessary to consider all <strong>of</strong> it’s components as well as<br />
the connections (interactions) between them. <strong>The</strong>se concepts are the basis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
systems biology approach to biological pathway analysis and network reconstruction.<br />
In recent years this approach has been successfully used to integrate data <strong>of</strong><br />
different types, and from different sources, on multiple types <strong>of</strong> circuit component<br />
– genes, mRNA, proteins, metabolites, microRNA, to obtain a more precise and<br />
comprehensive understanding <strong>of</strong> how disruptions to the circuitry can lead to disease<br />
or toxicity. Gross damage to the circuitry by removal or functional impairment<br />
<strong>of</strong> certain components may impact the functioning <strong>of</strong> the circuit. Individual differences<br />
in the system, arising through sequence variations in the DNA template for<br />
individual components, also may affect the response <strong>of</strong> the circuit to normal stimuli<br />
or to xenobiotic interference. <strong>The</strong>se variations manifest as different susceptibilities<br />
to disease, responses to therapeutic intervention or risks <strong>of</strong> chemical toxicity.<br />
<strong>The</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> data on the functional consequences <strong>of</strong> sequence variation to the<br />
systems biology circuit model will be critical to complete understanding <strong>of</strong> system<br />
malfunction or failure in disease or toxicity, and to the successful implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> personalized medicine.<br />
1740 ZEBRAFISH: A PREDICTIVE MODEL FOR ASSESSING<br />
CANCER DRUG-INDUCED ORGAN TOXICITY.<br />
L. D’Amico 1 , C. Li 1 , E. Glaze 2 , M. Davis 2 and W. L. Seng 2 . 1 Phylonix,<br />
Cambridge, MA and 2 NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD. Sponsor: P. McGrath.<br />
Toxic effects <strong>of</strong> 4 cancer compounds on CNS, heart, liver, and kidney were visually<br />
assessed in live, transparent zebrafish and compared to effects in mammals and humans.<br />
Compounds, tested blinded, included: 1) 17-DMAG, an HSP90 inhibitor<br />
in Phase I clinical trials for lymphoma, 2) paclitaxel, a microtubule stabilizer approved<br />
for breast cancer, 3) SMA-838, a transcriptional inhibitor, and 4) zebularine,<br />
a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor which has exhibited antitumor effects in<br />
preclinical studies. After adding compounds directly to fish water, LC10 and LC50<br />
were estimated and 6 concentrations below LC10 were then used to treat 2 or 4 day<br />
post fertilization zebrafish. Results showed that 17-DMAG induced defects in zebrafish<br />
CNS, heart, liver, and kidney and cell death in CNS, heart, and liver. In<br />
comparison, in rat and dog studies, only liver specific toxicity was observed. Similar<br />
to results in zebrafish, human clinical trial data showed that 17-DMAG induced<br />
CNS, heart, liver and kidney toxicity. Due to low solubility, at concentrations up to<br />
2 μM, paclitaxel, induced CNS toxicity, similar to data reported in human clinical<br />
trials. In contrast, in rats, no toxicity was identified in test organs. SMA838 caused<br />
both morphological defects and cell death in zebrafish CNS and liver. In comparison,<br />
in rats, no toxicity was observed in test organs. However, dog studies identified<br />
liver and kidney toxicity. No toxicity was observed in zebularine treated zebrafish,<br />
similar to results in preclinical studies. This small targeted study highlights the utility<br />
<strong>of</strong> using transparent zebrafish for assessing drug induced organ toxicity eliminating<br />
the need for surgical procedures. Advantages <strong>of</strong> using zebrafish as an animal<br />
model for assessing drug induced toxicity include: small amount <strong>of</strong> drug required,<br />
easy drug treatment directly in the fish water, short treatment time, visual assessment<br />
in transparent animals without the need for surgery and laborious processing,<br />
statistically significant number <strong>of</strong> animals per test, and low cost.<br />
1741 MANIPULATION OF THE WNT/β-CATENIN PATHWAY<br />
BY PROTOTYPIC INHIBITORS COMPARED TO<br />
MORPHOLINO KNOCKDOWN IN ZEBRAFISH.<br />
S. M. Eddy, D. B. Stedman and M. D. Aleo. Drug Safety, Pfizer Global Research<br />
and Development, Groton, CT.<br />
Manipulation <strong>of</strong> the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway can be demonstrated in<br />
Zebrafish (ZF) by treatment with prototypic inhibitors or Morpholino knock<br />
down <strong>of</strong> TCF4 or β-Catenin. Expression analysis following treatment with prototypic<br />
compounds FH535, IWR-1, XAV939, and SB415286 confirmed their effects<br />
on the Wnt pathway. Phenotype following inhibitor treatment was compared to<br />
that after TCF4 or β-Catenin Morpholino injection. Wild type Zf embryos were<br />
treated with FH535, IWR-1, XAV939, and SB415286 at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours<br />
SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING 373