27.07.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

model <strong>of</strong> APAP metabolism and glutathione depletion has been used to investigate<br />

the extent to which differences in metabolism and glutathione homeostasis explain<br />

interspecies differences in susceptibility to APAP toxicity. As compounds with other<br />

modalities <strong>of</strong> DILI are added to the platform, the resulting model will serve as a<br />

flexible biosimulation platform to enhance drug development by quickly identifying<br />

drug candidates that are likely to be associated with idiosyncratic hepatic toxicity,<br />

and to guide personalized medicine by determining patient characteristics associated<br />

with a greater likelihood <strong>of</strong> adverse liver responses.<br />

1736 DEFINING SYSTEMS BIOLOGY IN A MODE-OF-<br />

ACTION CONTEXT.<br />

S. Edwards. U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are many competing definitions for the term systems biology with much <strong>of</strong><br />

the ambiguity originating from the revolution in molecular biology techniques at<br />

the turn <strong>of</strong> the century. <strong>The</strong> sequencing <strong>of</strong> the human genome and advent <strong>of</strong> techniques<br />

for monitoring transcripts, proteins, and metabolites on a global scale<br />

opened the door for a new world <strong>of</strong> molecular systems biology. In this new era,<br />

most definitions <strong>of</strong> systems biology contain most (if not all) <strong>of</strong> the following elements:<br />

global measurements <strong>of</strong> biological molecules to the extent technically feasible,<br />

dynamic measurements <strong>of</strong> key biological molecules to establish quantitative relationships<br />

among them, and experimental designs which perturb the system in<br />

specific ways to determine these relationships. This presentation will discuss how<br />

this these components can be used to develop a model for disease based on an interconnected<br />

network <strong>of</strong> molecular, cellular, and organism-level events. <strong>The</strong>se disease<br />

networks can then serve as the framework for a network-based description <strong>of</strong><br />

mode <strong>of</strong> action. Approaching the problem from this perspective provides a biologically-based<br />

mechanism for incorporating other factors affecting risk such as genetic<br />

susceptibility, life stage, and pre-existing diseases. It also enhances the ability <strong>of</strong><br />

more traditional biological modeling approaches to lay the groundwork for toxicity<br />

pathway-based risk assessment. <strong>The</strong> approach will be illustrated using examples<br />

from both human health and ecological research. [This abstract does not necessarily<br />

reflect the view <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Protection Agency.]<br />

1737 PHARMGKB: THE PHARMCOGENOMICS<br />

KNOWLEDGE BASE.<br />

T. E. Klein. Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford,<br />

CA. Sponsor: L. Burgoon.<br />

<strong>The</strong> mission <strong>of</strong> the PharmGKB is to collect, encode, and disseminate knowledge<br />

about how human genetic variation affects drug response. Established in 2000,<br />

PharmGKB has become the pre-eminent resource for pharmacogenomics information.<br />

It was one <strong>of</strong> the first “post-genome” resources with information about both<br />

genotype and phenotype, and has now become a focal point for data sharing. Via<br />

literature review, the PharmGKB team curates primary data, and annotates gene<br />

variants and gene-drug-disease relationships, <strong>The</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> genotype, phenotype,<br />

and drug pathways allows for a systems level analysis and hypothesis generation<br />

on new gene-drug interactions and effects.<br />

1738 THE INTERSECTOME: INTEGRATION OF<br />

KNOWLEDGE IN SYSTEMS BIOLOGY FOR<br />

HYPOTHESIS GENERATION.<br />

A. Ma’ayan. Pharmacology and Systems <strong>The</strong>rapeutics, Mount Sinai School <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicine, New York, NY. Sponsor: L. Burgoon.<br />

I will discuss how we utilize data collected from the public domain, describing regulatory<br />

interactions in mammalian cells, to analyze results from experiments that<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile cells using a variety <strong>of</strong> cutting edge genome-wide pr<strong>of</strong>iling technologies. <strong>The</strong><br />

results from our analyses produce rational hypotheses for further experimental validation<br />

as well as provide a global view <strong>of</strong> cell regulation across multiple layers.<br />

Specifically, I will show GATE, a program we developed for the analysis <strong>of</strong> time-series<br />

expression data used to analyze stem cell differentiation. I will also demonstrate<br />

Genes2Networks a program we developed and used to predict components and<br />

pathways essential for CB1R induced neurite outgrowth <strong>of</strong> Neuro2A cells.<br />

Genes2Networks was also used to predict a novel disease gene that causes Noonan<br />

syndrome. Finally, I will discuss our tools KEA for the analysis <strong>of</strong> SILAC phosphoproteomics,<br />

and ChEA for the analysis <strong>of</strong> gene expression data using a ChIP-X<br />

database. I will conclude with a proposition <strong>of</strong> ideas about developing robust theoretical<br />

models for candidate drug/gene/protein rankings for functional experimental<br />

validation.<br />

1739 INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF DISTINCT MOLECULAR<br />

AND PHENOTYPIC DATA TYPES IN XENOBIOTIC<br />

RESPONSE MODELING.<br />

R. J. Brennan. <strong>Toxicology</strong>, GeneGo Inc., San Jose, CA.<br />

Signaling and metabolic pathways acting within and between cells in an organism<br />

may be considered as integrated circuits working to maintain cell growth or homeostasis<br />

based on inputs from external influences and other, connected pathways.<br />

<strong>The</strong> components <strong>of</strong> these circuits comprise DNA, RNA, proteins, enzymatic activities,<br />

small molecules, ions etc., and in order to fully understand the circuit, or to<br />

“reconstruct the system” it is necessary to consider all <strong>of</strong> it’s components as well as<br />

the connections (interactions) between them. <strong>The</strong>se concepts are the basis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

systems biology approach to biological pathway analysis and network reconstruction.<br />

In recent years this approach has been successfully used to integrate data <strong>of</strong><br />

different types, and from different sources, on multiple types <strong>of</strong> circuit component<br />

– genes, mRNA, proteins, metabolites, microRNA, to obtain a more precise and<br />

comprehensive understanding <strong>of</strong> how disruptions to the circuitry can lead to disease<br />

or toxicity. Gross damage to the circuitry by removal or functional impairment<br />

<strong>of</strong> certain components may impact the functioning <strong>of</strong> the circuit. Individual differences<br />

in the system, arising through sequence variations in the DNA template for<br />

individual components, also may affect the response <strong>of</strong> the circuit to normal stimuli<br />

or to xenobiotic interference. <strong>The</strong>se variations manifest as different susceptibilities<br />

to disease, responses to therapeutic intervention or risks <strong>of</strong> chemical toxicity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> data on the functional consequences <strong>of</strong> sequence variation to the<br />

systems biology circuit model will be critical to complete understanding <strong>of</strong> system<br />

malfunction or failure in disease or toxicity, and to the successful implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> personalized medicine.<br />

1740 ZEBRAFISH: A PREDICTIVE MODEL FOR ASSESSING<br />

CANCER DRUG-INDUCED ORGAN TOXICITY.<br />

L. D’Amico 1 , C. Li 1 , E. Glaze 2 , M. Davis 2 and W. L. Seng 2 . 1 Phylonix,<br />

Cambridge, MA and 2 NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD. Sponsor: P. McGrath.<br />

Toxic effects <strong>of</strong> 4 cancer compounds on CNS, heart, liver, and kidney were visually<br />

assessed in live, transparent zebrafish and compared to effects in mammals and humans.<br />

Compounds, tested blinded, included: 1) 17-DMAG, an HSP90 inhibitor<br />

in Phase I clinical trials for lymphoma, 2) paclitaxel, a microtubule stabilizer approved<br />

for breast cancer, 3) SMA-838, a transcriptional inhibitor, and 4) zebularine,<br />

a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor which has exhibited antitumor effects in<br />

preclinical studies. After adding compounds directly to fish water, LC10 and LC50<br />

were estimated and 6 concentrations below LC10 were then used to treat 2 or 4 day<br />

post fertilization zebrafish. Results showed that 17-DMAG induced defects in zebrafish<br />

CNS, heart, liver, and kidney and cell death in CNS, heart, and liver. In<br />

comparison, in rat and dog studies, only liver specific toxicity was observed. Similar<br />

to results in zebrafish, human clinical trial data showed that 17-DMAG induced<br />

CNS, heart, liver and kidney toxicity. Due to low solubility, at concentrations up to<br />

2 μM, paclitaxel, induced CNS toxicity, similar to data reported in human clinical<br />

trials. In contrast, in rats, no toxicity was identified in test organs. SMA838 caused<br />

both morphological defects and cell death in zebrafish CNS and liver. In comparison,<br />

in rats, no toxicity was observed in test organs. However, dog studies identified<br />

liver and kidney toxicity. No toxicity was observed in zebularine treated zebrafish,<br />

similar to results in preclinical studies. This small targeted study highlights the utility<br />

<strong>of</strong> using transparent zebrafish for assessing drug induced organ toxicity eliminating<br />

the need for surgical procedures. Advantages <strong>of</strong> using zebrafish as an animal<br />

model for assessing drug induced toxicity include: small amount <strong>of</strong> drug required,<br />

easy drug treatment directly in the fish water, short treatment time, visual assessment<br />

in transparent animals without the need for surgery and laborious processing,<br />

statistically significant number <strong>of</strong> animals per test, and low cost.<br />

1741 MANIPULATION OF THE WNT/β-CATENIN PATHWAY<br />

BY PROTOTYPIC INHIBITORS COMPARED TO<br />

MORPHOLINO KNOCKDOWN IN ZEBRAFISH.<br />

S. M. Eddy, D. B. Stedman and M. D. Aleo. Drug Safety, Pfizer Global Research<br />

and Development, Groton, CT.<br />

Manipulation <strong>of</strong> the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway can be demonstrated in<br />

Zebrafish (ZF) by treatment with prototypic inhibitors or Morpholino knock<br />

down <strong>of</strong> TCF4 or β-Catenin. Expression analysis following treatment with prototypic<br />

compounds FH535, IWR-1, XAV939, and SB415286 confirmed their effects<br />

on the Wnt pathway. Phenotype following inhibitor treatment was compared to<br />

that after TCF4 or β-Catenin Morpholino injection. Wild type Zf embryos were<br />

treated with FH535, IWR-1, XAV939, and SB415286 at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours<br />

SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING 373

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!