The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology
The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology
The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
essential oil <strong>of</strong> X. aromatica, presented an average toxicity (LC50 36.4-53.6<br />
μg/mL). Essential oil less toxic against A. franciscana was S. brownie (LC50 = 76.1-<br />
111.4 μg/mL). <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> this screening, as well as the GC/MS characterization,<br />
indicates that these species are important sources <strong>of</strong> diverse natural products with<br />
potential pharmacological properties. the assayed essential oils could be inserted in<br />
further pre and clinical toxicological evaluation in order to establish a safe exploitation<br />
<strong>of</strong> their biological potentiality.<br />
2237 HEPATIC GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING IN<br />
PERFLUOROHEXANE SULFONATE-EXPOSED WILD-<br />
TYPE AND PPARα-NULL MICE.<br />
M. B. Rosen 1 , J. R. Schmid 2 , K. P. Das 3 , H. Ren 4 , B. D. Abbott 3 and C. Lau 3 .<br />
1 Integrated Systems Biology, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2 Biostatistics and<br />
Bioinformatics, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, 3 <strong>Toxicology</strong> Assessment, U.S.<br />
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC and 4 Genomics Research Core, U.S. EPA, Research<br />
Triangle Park, NC.<br />
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) is one member <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> perfluoroakyl<br />
acids (PFAAs) presently recognized as widespread environmental contaminants.<br />
Like other PFAAs, PFHxS is also commonly found in human serum. Although<br />
PFHxS is presumed to be an activator <strong>of</strong> peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor<br />
alpha (PPARα), little is known about its toxicity. Male wild-type (WT) and<br />
PPARα-null (Null) mice were dosed by oral gavage with PFHxS (3 or 10<br />
mg/kg/day), or vehicle for 7 days. Animals were euthanized, livers weighed, and<br />
liver samples collected for preparation <strong>of</strong> total RNA. Gene pr<strong>of</strong>iling was conducted<br />
on 4 mice per group using Affymetrix 430_2 broad expression microarrays and the<br />
results were contrasted to data previously collected by our laboratory for other<br />
PFAAs. In WT mice, exposure to PFHxS altered the expression <strong>of</strong> genes associated<br />
with a number <strong>of</strong> PPARα-regulated biological functions such as fatty acid metabolism,<br />
inflammation, peroxisome biogenesis, and proteasome biogenesis. Genes related<br />
to cholesterol biosynthesis were up-regulated in WT mice as well. In Null<br />
mice, changes induced by PFHxS reinforced findings from prior studies which indicated<br />
that in the absence <strong>of</strong> PPARα signaling, various PFAAs maintain regulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> genes related to fatty acid metabolism, including Cyp4a14 and certain peroxisomal<br />
genes. <strong>The</strong> constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)-regulated gene, Cyp2b10,<br />
was up-regulated in both WT and Null mice suggesting that, like other PFAAs,<br />
PFHxS is an inducer <strong>of</strong> CAR. <strong>The</strong>se results demonstrate that the influence <strong>of</strong><br />
PFHxS on the murine transcriptone does not deviate significantly from that observed<br />
for other PFAAs and that PFHxS has both PPARα-dependent and -independent<br />
activity. (This abstract does not necessarily reflect EPA policy.)<br />
2238 EFFECTS OF BIOREMEDIATION ON TOXICITY AND<br />
GENOTOXICITY OF PAH-CONTAMINATED SOIL<br />
USING GENETIC ENGINEERED CELL LINES.<br />
J. Hu, J. Nakamura and M. D. Aitken. Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental Sciences &<br />
Engineering, Gillings School <strong>of</strong> Global Public Health, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina,<br />
Chapel Hill, NC.<br />
Bioremediation is one <strong>of</strong> the commonly applied remediation strategies at sites contaminated<br />
with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). However, it remains<br />
controversial whether bioremediation could reduce health risk while removing the<br />
target compounds. This study investigated changes in the toxicity and genotoxicity<br />
<strong>of</strong> PAH-contaminated soil from a former manufactured-gas plant site before and<br />
after two simulated bioremediation processes: treatment in a laboratory sequencing<br />
batch reactor and long-term, continuous-flow columns (control and biostimulated<br />
columns). Soil samples included untreated soil for the bioreactor, untreated soil<br />
used to pack the columns, treated soil from the bioreactor, and treated soils from<br />
four different sample ports along the column length in each column. Genotoxicity<br />
<strong>of</strong> soil extracts was determined by multi-well plate-based DNA damage response<br />
analysis using the chicken DT40 B-lymphocyte isogenic cell line (DT40) and its<br />
DNA-repair deficient mutant (RAD54 knockout) cell line (RAD54). Bioreactor<br />
treated soil had lower LD50(DT40) than untreated bioreactor soil (0.82±0.10 and<br />
1.29±0.05 mg dry soil/mL, respectively) while no significant difference was observed<br />
for LD50(RAD54) between these two soils (0.51±0.05 and 0.53±0.10 mg<br />
dry soil/mL, respectively). Treated soils from both the control and biostimulated<br />
columns had higher LD50(DT40) as well as LD50(RAD54) than untreated column<br />
soil (LD50(DT40): 4.32±0.16 and 1.94±0.16 mg dry soil/mL, respectively;<br />
LD50(RAD54): 1.78±0.12 and 1.25±0.01 mg dry soil/mL, respectively).<br />
Biostimulated column soils had both higher LD50(DT40) and LD50(RAD54)<br />
than control column soils at corresponding sample ports, but there was no significant<br />
difference in LD50 RAD54/DT40 ratio among these soils. <strong>The</strong>se results sug-<br />
480 SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING<br />
gest that bioremediation does not necessarily reduce the toxicity or genotoxicity <strong>of</strong><br />
PAH-contaminated soil, and that different bioremediation processes can have different<br />
effects on residual toxicity or genotoxicity.<br />
2239 PERFLUOROPHOSPHONIC ACID ACTIVATES<br />
PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED<br />
RECEPTOR-ALPHA BUT NOT CONSTITUTIVE<br />
ANDROSTANE RECEPTOR IN THE MURINE LIVER.<br />
K. P. Das 1 , M. B. Rosen 2 , C. R. Wood 1 , B. Abbott 1 and C. Lau 1 . 1 Toxicity<br />
Assessment Division, ORD, NHEERL, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC and<br />
2 Integrated System Toxicity Division/NHEERL/ORD, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle<br />
Park, NC.<br />
Masurf FS-780 is a commercial perfluoro-chemical mixture that contains C6-12perfluoroalkylphosphonic<br />
acid (PFPA) derivatives. PFPAs have received recent attention<br />
as a previously under recognized subclass <strong>of</strong> perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs)<br />
that are found in the environment. <strong>The</strong> current study was designed to evaluate liver<br />
toxicity <strong>of</strong> PFPAs and to contrast these findings to studies previously conducted by<br />
our group for other PFAAs. Two independent experiments were conducted. In experiment<br />
one, adult male CD-1 mice were given Masurf FS-780 once daily for 7<br />
days by oral gavage at 10.4, or 41.6 mg/kg. In a second experiment, SV129 wildtype<br />
(WT) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα)-null<br />
male mice (Null) were similarly dosed with Masurf FS-780 at 3.1 or 20.8<br />
mg/kg/day. Mice from each dose group, along with concurrent controls, were sacrificed<br />
24 h after the last treatment. Liver samples were collected for real time RT-<br />
PCR <strong>of</strong> selected genes using Taqman assays. Dose-dependent elevations <strong>of</strong> liver<br />
weight were found in CD-1 and SV129 WT mice but not in Null mice. Similarly,<br />
genes known to be regulated by PPARα were up-regulated in a dose-dependent<br />
fashion in CD-1 and SV129 WT mice but, with the exception <strong>of</strong> Cyp4a14, were<br />
unchanged in Null mice. Hence, like other PFAAs, PFPAs appear to function as an<br />
activators <strong>of</strong> PPARα. Unlike other PFAAs (perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorooctane<br />
sulfonate, perfluorononanoic acid), Masurf FS-780 does not up-regulate the constitutive<br />
androstane receptor (CAR) regulated gene, Cyp2b10, in either strain <strong>of</strong> mice<br />
examined suggesting that PFPAs may not activate CAR. <strong>The</strong>se results suggest that<br />
PFPA-induced liver enlargement occurs specifically through activation <strong>of</strong> PPARα.<br />
(This abstract does not necessarily reflect US EPA policy.)<br />
2240 ACTIVATION OF MOUSE AND HUMAN<br />
PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED<br />
RECEPTOR-ALPHA (PPARα) BY PERFLUOROALKYL<br />
ACIDS (PFAAS) OF 5, 7, 8, 11, AND 12 CARBON<br />
CHAIN LENGTHS IN COS-1 CELLS.<br />
C. J. Wolf, C. Lau and B. D. Abbott. Toxicity Assessment Division, U.S. EPA,<br />
ORD, NHEERL, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
PFAAs are surfactants that have been found globally in the environment and in tissues<br />
<strong>of</strong> humans and wildlife. <strong>The</strong>y adversely affect perinatal survival and development<br />
in rodents and PPARα is involved in inducing these effects. Our previous<br />
study demonstrated that some PFAAs activate PPARα in transiently transfected<br />
COS-1 cells. Here we test additional PFAAs for their ability to activate mouse and<br />
human PPARα. COS-1 cells were transfected with either a mouse or human<br />
PPARα-responsive luciferase reporter plasmid. After 24 hours, cells were exposed to<br />
either vehicle control (0.1 % DMSO or water), PPARα agonist (WY14643, 10<br />
μM), perfluoropentanoic acid (C5), perfluoroheptanoic acid (C7), perflourooctanoic<br />
acid (C8), perfluoroundecanoic acid (C11), or perfluorododecanoic acid<br />
(C12) at thirteen concentrations from 0.5 - 100 μM. After 24 hours <strong>of</strong> exposure,<br />
cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured. Data were analyzed using<br />
ANOVA and linear regression analysis. Relative PFAA activities were compared<br />
using C20max, the concentration at which each PFAA produces 20% <strong>of</strong> the highest<br />
response elicited by the most active PFAA for each species. C8 induced the highest<br />
activity in the human PPARα, followed by C7, C5, and C11 (C20max, 4.5<br />
μM, 13 μM, 45 μM and 126 μM). C12 had little activity (C20max could not be<br />
calculated). However, the highest activity in the mouse PPARα was induced by<br />
C12 followed by C8, C11, C7 and C5 (C20max, 5.4 μM, 7.2 μM, 9.2 μM, 11<br />
μM, and 35 μM, respectively). While each PFAA activated the mouse and human<br />
PPARα, they generally induced less activity in human than in mouse PPARα. We<br />
found a pattern <strong>of</strong> increasing activity with increasing chain length <strong>of</strong> the PFAA up<br />
to C8 and low activity with longer chain PFAAs (C11 and C12) with human<br />
PPARα, a pattern we reported previously. This study completes our survey <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ability <strong>of</strong> PFAAs from C4 through C12 to induce PPARα activity in vitro. This abstract<br />
does not necessarily reflect EPA policy.