27.07.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

essential oil <strong>of</strong> X. aromatica, presented an average toxicity (LC50 36.4-53.6<br />

μg/mL). Essential oil less toxic against A. franciscana was S. brownie (LC50 = 76.1-<br />

111.4 μg/mL). <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> this screening, as well as the GC/MS characterization,<br />

indicates that these species are important sources <strong>of</strong> diverse natural products with<br />

potential pharmacological properties. the assayed essential oils could be inserted in<br />

further pre and clinical toxicological evaluation in order to establish a safe exploitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> their biological potentiality.<br />

2237 HEPATIC GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING IN<br />

PERFLUOROHEXANE SULFONATE-EXPOSED WILD-<br />

TYPE AND PPARα-NULL MICE.<br />

M. B. Rosen 1 , J. R. Schmid 2 , K. P. Das 3 , H. Ren 4 , B. D. Abbott 3 and C. Lau 3 .<br />

1 Integrated Systems Biology, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2 Biostatistics and<br />

Bioinformatics, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, 3 <strong>Toxicology</strong> Assessment, U.S.<br />

EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC and 4 Genomics Research Core, U.S. EPA, Research<br />

Triangle Park, NC.<br />

Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) is one member <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> perfluoroakyl<br />

acids (PFAAs) presently recognized as widespread environmental contaminants.<br />

Like other PFAAs, PFHxS is also commonly found in human serum. Although<br />

PFHxS is presumed to be an activator <strong>of</strong> peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor<br />

alpha (PPARα), little is known about its toxicity. Male wild-type (WT) and<br />

PPARα-null (Null) mice were dosed by oral gavage with PFHxS (3 or 10<br />

mg/kg/day), or vehicle for 7 days. Animals were euthanized, livers weighed, and<br />

liver samples collected for preparation <strong>of</strong> total RNA. Gene pr<strong>of</strong>iling was conducted<br />

on 4 mice per group using Affymetrix 430_2 broad expression microarrays and the<br />

results were contrasted to data previously collected by our laboratory for other<br />

PFAAs. In WT mice, exposure to PFHxS altered the expression <strong>of</strong> genes associated<br />

with a number <strong>of</strong> PPARα-regulated biological functions such as fatty acid metabolism,<br />

inflammation, peroxisome biogenesis, and proteasome biogenesis. Genes related<br />

to cholesterol biosynthesis were up-regulated in WT mice as well. In Null<br />

mice, changes induced by PFHxS reinforced findings from prior studies which indicated<br />

that in the absence <strong>of</strong> PPARα signaling, various PFAAs maintain regulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> genes related to fatty acid metabolism, including Cyp4a14 and certain peroxisomal<br />

genes. <strong>The</strong> constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)-regulated gene, Cyp2b10,<br />

was up-regulated in both WT and Null mice suggesting that, like other PFAAs,<br />

PFHxS is an inducer <strong>of</strong> CAR. <strong>The</strong>se results demonstrate that the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

PFHxS on the murine transcriptone does not deviate significantly from that observed<br />

for other PFAAs and that PFHxS has both PPARα-dependent and -independent<br />

activity. (This abstract does not necessarily reflect EPA policy.)<br />

2238 EFFECTS OF BIOREMEDIATION ON TOXICITY AND<br />

GENOTOXICITY OF PAH-CONTAMINATED SOIL<br />

USING GENETIC ENGINEERED CELL LINES.<br />

J. Hu, J. Nakamura and M. D. Aitken. Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental Sciences &<br />

Engineering, Gillings School <strong>of</strong> Global Public Health, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina,<br />

Chapel Hill, NC.<br />

Bioremediation is one <strong>of</strong> the commonly applied remediation strategies at sites contaminated<br />

with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). However, it remains<br />

controversial whether bioremediation could reduce health risk while removing the<br />

target compounds. This study investigated changes in the toxicity and genotoxicity<br />

<strong>of</strong> PAH-contaminated soil from a former manufactured-gas plant site before and<br />

after two simulated bioremediation processes: treatment in a laboratory sequencing<br />

batch reactor and long-term, continuous-flow columns (control and biostimulated<br />

columns). Soil samples included untreated soil for the bioreactor, untreated soil<br />

used to pack the columns, treated soil from the bioreactor, and treated soils from<br />

four different sample ports along the column length in each column. Genotoxicity<br />

<strong>of</strong> soil extracts was determined by multi-well plate-based DNA damage response<br />

analysis using the chicken DT40 B-lymphocyte isogenic cell line (DT40) and its<br />

DNA-repair deficient mutant (RAD54 knockout) cell line (RAD54). Bioreactor<br />

treated soil had lower LD50(DT40) than untreated bioreactor soil (0.82±0.10 and<br />

1.29±0.05 mg dry soil/mL, respectively) while no significant difference was observed<br />

for LD50(RAD54) between these two soils (0.51±0.05 and 0.53±0.10 mg<br />

dry soil/mL, respectively). Treated soils from both the control and biostimulated<br />

columns had higher LD50(DT40) as well as LD50(RAD54) than untreated column<br />

soil (LD50(DT40): 4.32±0.16 and 1.94±0.16 mg dry soil/mL, respectively;<br />

LD50(RAD54): 1.78±0.12 and 1.25±0.01 mg dry soil/mL, respectively).<br />

Biostimulated column soils had both higher LD50(DT40) and LD50(RAD54)<br />

than control column soils at corresponding sample ports, but there was no significant<br />

difference in LD50 RAD54/DT40 ratio among these soils. <strong>The</strong>se results sug-<br />

480 SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING<br />

gest that bioremediation does not necessarily reduce the toxicity or genotoxicity <strong>of</strong><br />

PAH-contaminated soil, and that different bioremediation processes can have different<br />

effects on residual toxicity or genotoxicity.<br />

2239 PERFLUOROPHOSPHONIC ACID ACTIVATES<br />

PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED<br />

RECEPTOR-ALPHA BUT NOT CONSTITUTIVE<br />

ANDROSTANE RECEPTOR IN THE MURINE LIVER.<br />

K. P. Das 1 , M. B. Rosen 2 , C. R. Wood 1 , B. Abbott 1 and C. Lau 1 . 1 Toxicity<br />

Assessment Division, ORD, NHEERL, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC and<br />

2 Integrated System Toxicity Division/NHEERL/ORD, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle<br />

Park, NC.<br />

Masurf FS-780 is a commercial perfluoro-chemical mixture that contains C6-12perfluoroalkylphosphonic<br />

acid (PFPA) derivatives. PFPAs have received recent attention<br />

as a previously under recognized subclass <strong>of</strong> perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs)<br />

that are found in the environment. <strong>The</strong> current study was designed to evaluate liver<br />

toxicity <strong>of</strong> PFPAs and to contrast these findings to studies previously conducted by<br />

our group for other PFAAs. Two independent experiments were conducted. In experiment<br />

one, adult male CD-1 mice were given Masurf FS-780 once daily for 7<br />

days by oral gavage at 10.4, or 41.6 mg/kg. In a second experiment, SV129 wildtype<br />

(WT) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα)-null<br />

male mice (Null) were similarly dosed with Masurf FS-780 at 3.1 or 20.8<br />

mg/kg/day. Mice from each dose group, along with concurrent controls, were sacrificed<br />

24 h after the last treatment. Liver samples were collected for real time RT-<br />

PCR <strong>of</strong> selected genes using Taqman assays. Dose-dependent elevations <strong>of</strong> liver<br />

weight were found in CD-1 and SV129 WT mice but not in Null mice. Similarly,<br />

genes known to be regulated by PPARα were up-regulated in a dose-dependent<br />

fashion in CD-1 and SV129 WT mice but, with the exception <strong>of</strong> Cyp4a14, were<br />

unchanged in Null mice. Hence, like other PFAAs, PFPAs appear to function as an<br />

activators <strong>of</strong> PPARα. Unlike other PFAAs (perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorooctane<br />

sulfonate, perfluorononanoic acid), Masurf FS-780 does not up-regulate the constitutive<br />

androstane receptor (CAR) regulated gene, Cyp2b10, in either strain <strong>of</strong> mice<br />

examined suggesting that PFPAs may not activate CAR. <strong>The</strong>se results suggest that<br />

PFPA-induced liver enlargement occurs specifically through activation <strong>of</strong> PPARα.<br />

(This abstract does not necessarily reflect US EPA policy.)<br />

2240 ACTIVATION OF MOUSE AND HUMAN<br />

PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED<br />

RECEPTOR-ALPHA (PPARα) BY PERFLUOROALKYL<br />

ACIDS (PFAAS) OF 5, 7, 8, 11, AND 12 CARBON<br />

CHAIN LENGTHS IN COS-1 CELLS.<br />

C. J. Wolf, C. Lau and B. D. Abbott. Toxicity Assessment Division, U.S. EPA,<br />

ORD, NHEERL, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

PFAAs are surfactants that have been found globally in the environment and in tissues<br />

<strong>of</strong> humans and wildlife. <strong>The</strong>y adversely affect perinatal survival and development<br />

in rodents and PPARα is involved in inducing these effects. Our previous<br />

study demonstrated that some PFAAs activate PPARα in transiently transfected<br />

COS-1 cells. Here we test additional PFAAs for their ability to activate mouse and<br />

human PPARα. COS-1 cells were transfected with either a mouse or human<br />

PPARα-responsive luciferase reporter plasmid. After 24 hours, cells were exposed to<br />

either vehicle control (0.1 % DMSO or water), PPARα agonist (WY14643, 10<br />

μM), perfluoropentanoic acid (C5), perfluoroheptanoic acid (C7), perflourooctanoic<br />

acid (C8), perfluoroundecanoic acid (C11), or perfluorododecanoic acid<br />

(C12) at thirteen concentrations from 0.5 - 100 μM. After 24 hours <strong>of</strong> exposure,<br />

cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured. Data were analyzed using<br />

ANOVA and linear regression analysis. Relative PFAA activities were compared<br />

using C20max, the concentration at which each PFAA produces 20% <strong>of</strong> the highest<br />

response elicited by the most active PFAA for each species. C8 induced the highest<br />

activity in the human PPARα, followed by C7, C5, and C11 (C20max, 4.5<br />

μM, 13 μM, 45 μM and 126 μM). C12 had little activity (C20max could not be<br />

calculated). However, the highest activity in the mouse PPARα was induced by<br />

C12 followed by C8, C11, C7 and C5 (C20max, 5.4 μM, 7.2 μM, 9.2 μM, 11<br />

μM, and 35 μM, respectively). While each PFAA activated the mouse and human<br />

PPARα, they generally induced less activity in human than in mouse PPARα. We<br />

found a pattern <strong>of</strong> increasing activity with increasing chain length <strong>of</strong> the PFAA up<br />

to C8 and low activity with longer chain PFAAs (C11 and C12) with human<br />

PPARα, a pattern we reported previously. This study completes our survey <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ability <strong>of</strong> PFAAs from C4 through C12 to induce PPARα activity in vitro. This abstract<br />

does not necessarily reflect EPA policy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!