27.07.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

934 THE FDA’S LIVER TOXICITY KNOWLEDGE BASE<br />

(LTKB) PROJECT.<br />

W. Tong 1 , M. Chen 1 , V. Vikrant 1 , Q. Shi 1 , M. Zhang 1 , L. Guo 2 , Z. Liu 1 , J.<br />

Zhang 1 and E. Bearden 1 . 1 Division <strong>of</strong> Systems Biology, U.S. FDA’s NCTR, Jefferson,<br />

AR and 2 Division <strong>of</strong> Biochemical <strong>Toxicology</strong>, U.S. FDA’s NCTR, Jefferson, AR.<br />

A significant amount <strong>of</strong> drugs to be withdrawn from the market and to fail during<br />

clinical trial stage <strong>of</strong> development is due to liver toxicity. <strong>The</strong>se cases <strong>of</strong> drug-induced<br />

liver injury (DILI) are reported as the leading cause <strong>of</strong> acute liver failure in<br />

the U.S. Thus, DILI has become one <strong>of</strong> the most important concerns in the drug<br />

development and approval process. DILI has also been identified by the FDA<br />

Critical Path Initiatives as a key area <strong>of</strong> focus in a concerted effort to broaden the<br />

agency’s knowledge for better evaluation tools and safety biomarkers. In order to<br />

understand liver toxicity at the mechanistic level and develop novel tools for identifying<br />

liver toxicity issues along the various stages <strong>of</strong> drug development, there is a<br />

need to develop content-rich resources to improve our basic understanding <strong>of</strong> liver<br />

toxicity and facilitate the efficient development <strong>of</strong> novel knowledge and tools for<br />

utilization by research, industry and regulatory groups. <strong>The</strong> FDA’s National Center<br />

for Toxicological Research is developing a liver toxicity knowledge base (LTKB).<br />

<strong>The</strong> project is drug-specific with aim to identify potential risk factors distinguishing<br />

drugs in DILI. Thus, the project involves a collection <strong>of</strong> diverse data (e.g., DILI<br />

mechanisms, drug metabolism, histopathology, therapeutic use, targets, side effects,<br />

etc) associated with individual drugs and systems biology analysis to integrate these<br />

data for DILI assessment and prediction. Importantly, both conventional and highthroughput<br />

molecular biomarker assays will be conducted for selected drugs to develop<br />

novel biomarkers based on knowledge accumulated from the project. <strong>The</strong><br />

project will provide a wealth <strong>of</strong> focused knowledge and data mining tools for hepatotoxicity<br />

in the form <strong>of</strong> networks between chemicals (and drugs), molecular signatures,<br />

liver specific biomarkers, genes/proteins functions, pathways and liver diseases<br />

(and pathology). <strong>The</strong> preliminary results and early progress <strong>of</strong> LTKB will be<br />

discussed.<br />

935 VALIDATION OF CELLCIPHR CELLULAR SYSTEMS<br />

BIOLOGY (CSB) TECHNOLOGY. CELLCIPHR2 -<br />

BUILDING ON EXPERIENCE OF IN VIVO RAT LIVER<br />

INJURY PREDICTION TO DEVELOP THE HUMAN<br />

DILI PREDICTION.<br />

S. Thomas 2 , J. Mein 2 , R. Annand 1 , P. Walker 2 , M. Jacewicz 1 , D. Steen 3 , C.<br />

Chesne 3 , J. Gilbert 1, 2 and K. Tsaioun 1, 2 . 1 Apredica, Watertown, MA, 2 Cyprotex,<br />

Macclesfield, United Kingdom and 3 Biopredic, Rennes, France.<br />

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the most frequent reason for the withdrawal <strong>of</strong><br />

an approved drug from the market, and it also accounts for up to 50% <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>of</strong><br />

acute liver failure. Nominating pre-clinical candidates is one <strong>of</strong> the most important<br />

activities in drug development, that clears the path for a compound to be tested in<br />

human clinical trials. Hence, it is <strong>of</strong> crucial importance for drug development<br />

teams to reduce the failures in preclinical toxicity studies. CellCiphr Cellular<br />

Systems Biology (CSB) technology is an in vitro discovery toxicology platform that<br />

has been validated by top large pharmaceutical companies and EPA, FDA, and<br />

NIH for identifying the risks <strong>of</strong> rat liver toxicity in new chemical entities. <strong>The</strong> most<br />

common uses <strong>of</strong> this technology currently are for lead series selection, lead optimization,<br />

and animal toxicity studies optimization. CellCiphr is built on highcontent<br />

imaging and currently only predicts rat liver injury. As part <strong>of</strong> building <strong>of</strong><br />

the human DILI prediction model, a sub-set <strong>of</strong> drugs with documented human<br />

DILI or lack there<strong>of</strong> has been assessed in a new model in a number <strong>of</strong> rat and<br />

human transformed and primary liver models including HepG2, HepaRG and primary<br />

cells. Comparison <strong>of</strong> these models and their advantages and limitations in<br />

building classifiers for human prediction models will be presented for the first time.<br />

<strong>The</strong> utility <strong>of</strong> rat liver classifiers for prediction <strong>of</strong> human DILI will be assessed and<br />

new classifiers presented. CellCiphr technology is a mission-critical tool in drug development,<br />

and addition <strong>of</strong> human DILI model to already validated rat model is a<br />

significant advanced new tool allowing drug discovery teams to save significant<br />

funds by reducing the late attrition.<br />

936 INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF MITOCHONDRIAL<br />

TOXICITY IN DRUG-INDUCED LIVER INJURY VIA<br />

CONGRUENT STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY<br />

RELATIONSHIPS.<br />

M. L. Patel 1 , L. Fisk 1 , N. Greene 2 and R. T. Naven 2 . 1 Lhasa Limited, Leeds,<br />

United Kingdom and 2 Worldwide Medicinal Chemistry, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT.<br />

Drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction may represent a key mechanistic pathway<br />

in the development <strong>of</strong> organ-related toxicities, including those affecting the liver.<br />

<strong>The</strong> silent accumulation <strong>of</strong> damage to mitochondria over time has been proposed as<br />

an explanation for observed idiosyncratic toxicity. As part <strong>of</strong> ongoing work to de-<br />

velop structure-activity relationships (SARs) to predict the toxicity <strong>of</strong> chemicals, we<br />

investigated the suitability <strong>of</strong> using existing hepatotoxicity structural alerts, as indicators<br />

<strong>of</strong> mitochondrial dysfunction. We report the evaluation <strong>of</strong> a hepatotoxicity<br />

knowledge base, using three published data sets for mitochondrial dysfunction.<br />

Two data sets, comprising <strong>of</strong> 105 and 282 compounds, respectively, were constructed<br />

based on publications reporting in vivo results for mitochondrial toxicity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> third data set <strong>of</strong> 2490 compounds was based on the results <strong>of</strong> in vitro assays.<br />

<strong>The</strong> three data sets were processed against a knowledge base <strong>of</strong> 62 SARs for hepatotoxicity.<br />

Predictions were classed as correct when a hepatotoxicity alert was activated<br />

for a compound reported to cause mitochondrial dysfunction, or, in the absence<br />

<strong>of</strong> any alerts for a compound, reported to be negative. <strong>The</strong> results showed an<br />

overall concordance <strong>of</strong> 55% to 65% across the three data sets, with sensitivity ranging<br />

from 28% to 62% and specificity from 67% to 72%.<br />

We have previously developed alerts for hepatotoxicity based on published in vivo<br />

data. A subset <strong>of</strong> these alerts performed well against the data sets reporting in vivo<br />

evaluations, indicating that for those chemical classes, the mechanisms <strong>of</strong> toxicity<br />

may act through the mitochondria. This was in contrast to the performance against<br />

the data set reporting in vitro results. Reasons for this could include the biased coverage<br />

<strong>of</strong> chemical space <strong>of</strong> the hepatotoxicity alerts, and the extrapolation <strong>of</strong> alerts<br />

based on in vivo data to predict in an in vitro scenario.<br />

937 QUANTITATIVE SIMULATION OF INTRACELLULAR<br />

SIGNALING CASCADES IN A VIRTUAL LIVER:<br />

ESTIMATING DOSE DEPENDENT CHANGES IN<br />

HEPATOCELLULAR PROLIFERATION AND<br />

APOPTOSIS.<br />

J. Jack 1 , M. Mennecozzi 2 , C. Haugh 1 , J. Wambaugh 1 and I. Shah 1 . 1 National<br />

Center for Computational <strong>Toxicology</strong>, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC and<br />

2 Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> US EPA Virtual Liver (v-Liver) is developing an approach to predict dosedependent<br />

hepatotoxicity as an in vivo tissue level response using in vitro data. <strong>The</strong><br />

v-Liver accomplishes this using an in silico agent-based systems model that dynamically<br />

integrates environmental exposure, microdosimetry, and individual cellular<br />

responses to simulate the in vivo hepatic lobule. One requirement for the v-Liver<br />

models is inclusion <strong>of</strong> nuclear receptor (NR) pathways critical to nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogenesis.<br />

Progress to date has focused on signal transduction networks<br />

controlling cell proliferation and apoptosis, which are key events in hepatocarcinogenesis.<br />

First, a literature derived knowledgebase was used to reconstruct a biochemical<br />

signaling network <strong>of</strong> cell cycle initiation and caspase-mediated apoptotic<br />

signaling events. <strong>The</strong> network contains 46 proteins and 77 interactions, encompassing<br />

pathways relevant to hepatocytes including the epidermal growth factor<br />

(EGF) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα). Second, static analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

topology <strong>of</strong> the crosstalk network revealed key signaling proteins, reducing the<br />

overall complexity <strong>of</strong> the model. Third, the mechanistic model was translated into<br />

an asynchronous Boolean network ensemble to simulate the quantitative dose-response<br />

<strong>of</strong> hepatocyte populations to various ligands: growth factors, cytokines, and<br />

mitogenic inhibitors. <strong>The</strong> model predictions are consistent with the synergistic effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> EGF and TNFα on early cell proliferation reported in the literature. Finally,<br />

the model was calibrated with ToxCast data on environmental compounds, revealing<br />

the potential impact <strong>of</strong> chemical perturbations on normal hepatocyte behavior.<br />

This approach <strong>of</strong> static and dynamic pathway analysis and evaluation using<br />

in vitro data provides a foundation for estimating tissue level effects <strong>of</strong> chemical exposures<br />

from the simulation <strong>of</strong> individual cellular responses. This abstract does not<br />

necessarily reflect US EPA policy.<br />

938 PHYSIOLOGICALLY BASED PHARMACOKINETIC<br />

(PBPK) MODELING TO PREDICT PLASMA<br />

PHARMACOKINETICS FOR LIVER TRANSPORTER<br />

SUBSTRATES.<br />

H. A. Barton 1 , H. Jones 2 and Y. Lai 1 . 1 Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and<br />

Metabolism, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, CT and 2 Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics,<br />

and Metabolism, Pfizer, Inc., Sandwich, United Kingdom.<br />

Predictions <strong>of</strong> plasma pharmacokinetics for substrates <strong>of</strong> liver uptake and biliary excretion<br />

transporters can be made using PBPK models. We have implemented a<br />

PBPK model for several drugs including fluvastatin, valsartan, rosuvastatin, and<br />

others. <strong>The</strong> well stirred liver is replaced with liver blood and tissue compartments<br />

connected by bidirectional passive diffusion and active uptake transport, while active<br />

efflux from liver to blood is assumed not to occur. Liver disposition includes<br />

nonspecific binding (partitioning), metabolism, and active biliary transport. Active<br />

transport processes, assumed to be occurring at concentrations below half maximal<br />

activity, are described by first order processes parameterized as clearances <strong>of</strong> free<br />

SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING 199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!