27.07.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

classifications were “non-severe”, these were considered to be GHS “Cat. 2”. <strong>The</strong><br />

tiered (bottom-up) approach combining the STE test, the EpiOcular assay / the<br />

HET-CAM (a) assay and the BCOP assay allowed the evaluation <strong>of</strong> GHS eye irritation<br />

rankings with a favorable predictivity (accuracy > 75%, under prediction rate<br />

< 5%). From these results, this tiered approach might be a promising alternative<br />

method for predicting eye irritation.<br />

1002 TOWARDS ANIMAL-FREE TESTING FOR SKIN<br />

SENSITIZATION: IN-HOUSE VALIDATION OF FOUR<br />

METHODS: MUSST, H-CLAT, KERATINOSENS, AND<br />

DPRA.<br />

C. Bauch 1, 2 , T. Eltze 1 , E. Fabian 1 , S. N. Kolle 1 , C. Pachel 1, 3 , T. R. Hernandez 1 ,<br />

B. Wiench 1, 4 , C. J. Wruck 2 , R. Landsiedel 1 and B. van Ravenzwaay 1 .<br />

1 Experimental <strong>Toxicology</strong> and Ecology, BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany,<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Anatomy and Cell Biology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen,<br />

Germany, 3 Technical University Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany and<br />

4 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Chemistry, Pharmaceutics, and Geosciences, Johannes Gutenberg<br />

University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. Sponsor: A. Van Cott.<br />

Allergic contact dermatitis is induced by repeated skin contact with an allergen.<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> the skin sensitizing potential <strong>of</strong> chemicals, agrochemicals, and cosmetic<br />

ingredients is crucial to define their safe handling and use. Up to now, animal<br />

tests have been used to identify skin sensitizing potential. Animal welfare as well as<br />

the 7th Amendment to the Cosmetics Directive and REACH demands animal free<br />

alternatives. <strong>The</strong> mechanisms <strong>of</strong> induction and elicitation <strong>of</strong> skin sensitization are<br />

complex. To account for the multitude <strong>of</strong> events in the induction <strong>of</strong> skin sensitization<br />

an in vitro test system will consist <strong>of</strong> a battery <strong>of</strong> various tests. Currently, we<br />

perform in house validations <strong>of</strong> four in vitro assays addressing three different events<br />

during induction <strong>of</strong> skin sensitization. 1) <strong>The</strong> peptide reactivity assay (DPRA, 1)<br />

using synthetic peptides and HPLC analysis. 2) Two dendritic cell based assays on<br />

the cell lines U 937 (MUSST) and THP-1 (h-CLAT) and flow cytometric detection<br />

<strong>of</strong> the maturation markers CD54 and/or CD86 (2, 3). 3) ARE-dependent<br />

gene activity in the reporter gene cell line KeratinoSens. We present the results <strong>of</strong><br />

these assays with more than 40 substances <strong>of</strong> known sensitizing potential including<br />

the performance standards defined for the LLNA. <strong>The</strong> sensitivity, specificity and<br />

accuracy <strong>of</strong> individual tests were obtained by comparison to human epidemiological<br />

data as well as to data from the local lymph node assay.<br />

1003 ASSESSMENT OF AIRWAY GENOTOXICITY<br />

POTENTIAL USING THE EPIAIRWAY IN VITRO<br />

HUMAN AIRWAY MODEL AND THE COMET ASSAY.<br />

A. Armento, J. DeLuca, Y. Kaluzhny, H. Kandarova, M. Klausner and P. J.<br />

Hayden. MatTek Corp., Ashland, MA.<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> genotoxicity potential is an important consideration for safety assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> chemicals that may be inhaled during exposure to consumer products,<br />

occupational chemicals or environmental pollutants. Commonly used in vitro<br />

genotoxocity assays produce a high rate <strong>of</strong> false positive results, limiting their practical<br />

utility for predicting human genotoxicity hazard. For assessment <strong>of</strong> organ-specific<br />

genotoxicity, 3D in vitro human tissue models which have in vivo-like barrier<br />

function and metabolic capability are expected to have improved biological relevance<br />

and predictive ability. Due to recently enacted legislation including REACH<br />

and a ban on animal testing <strong>of</strong> cosmetics by the 7th Amendment to the Cosmetics<br />

Directive, predictive organ specific genotoxicity tests are urgently needed. Previous<br />

work has focused on development <strong>of</strong> skin specific genotoxicity tests including the<br />

micronucleus assay and the comet assay. In the current poster, we describe development<br />

<strong>of</strong> an airway specific genotoxocity assay using the EpiAirway model and the<br />

Comet Assay. <strong>The</strong> EpiAirway model is produced from normal human airway epithelial<br />

cells and reproduces the psudeostratified mucociliary phenotype <strong>of</strong> in vivo<br />

proximal airways. <strong>The</strong> model has functional tight junctions, in vivo-like barrier<br />

properties and in vivo-like xenobiotic metabolizing capabilities. EpiAirway tissues<br />

were digested with (0.25%) trypsin to produce cell suspensions for use in Comet<br />

Assay experiments. 100 comets were visually scored per tissue and each condition<br />

was run in duplicate tissues. Visually scoring was conducted by assigning values for<br />

% tail DNA on a 5 category scale (0 being undamaged DNA to 4 >80% DNA in<br />

tail). Untreated control samples produced low background comet scores. Treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the EpiAirway tissues with prototypical genotoxins such as methyl methane sulfonate<br />

(MMS) prior to digestion produced statistically significant, dose-dependent<br />

increases in % tail DNA. Thus, the EpiAirway Comet Assay appears to be a promising<br />

approach to in vitro airway genotoxicity testing.<br />

214 SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING<br />

1004 APPLICATION OF PRECISION-CUT LIVER SLICES FOR<br />

THE INVESTIGATION OF XENOBIOTIC-INDUCED<br />

CELL PROLIFERATION.<br />

E. Fabian 1 , F. Schuck 2, 1 , C. Jaeckh 1 , S. Groetters 1 , B. van Ravenzwaay 1 and R.<br />

Landsiedel 1 . 1 Expermental <strong>Toxicology</strong> and Ecology, BASF SE, Ludwigshafen,<br />

Germany and 2 Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.<br />

Precision-cut liver slices (PCLiS) are a commonly used in vitro system for the assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> metabolism and transport <strong>of</strong> xenobiotica in the liver. Within the current<br />

study, PCLiS were evaluated for their applicability to detect xenobiotic induced<br />

cell proliferation, since cell proliferation is a non-genotoxic contributor to hepatocarcinogenesis.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, a rotating culture system was established and characterized<br />

by viability parameters such as membrane integrity (LDH, ALT), energy status<br />

(ATP) and mitochondrial activity (MTT). In this system FCS-supplemented<br />

Williams’ Medium E sustained liver slices for four to six days. Intracellular LDH activities<br />

<strong>of</strong> slices showed activities <strong>of</strong> more than 200 U/L/mg wet weight after three<br />

days <strong>of</strong> culture and declined to 5% <strong>of</strong> this activity after six days. ATP assessment<br />

showed similar results. Slices contained levels <strong>of</strong> about 100 pmol ATP/mg wet<br />

weight after three days <strong>of</strong> cultivation and declined to 3% <strong>of</strong> this level after six days.<br />

Data from the MTT assay confirmed these findings. <strong>The</strong> mitochondrial reduction<br />

declined to levels <strong>of</strong> about 40% <strong>of</strong> the control after six days <strong>of</strong> cultivation. Based on<br />

the established culture conditions, the system was tested for its capability to induce<br />

hepatocyte proliferation after treatment with Wy-14,643, a known PPARα agonist<br />

in rodents. <strong>The</strong> proliferation in cultured liver slices was assessed as an integral over<br />

five days by BrdU co-incubation and immuno-staining <strong>of</strong> histological sections <strong>of</strong><br />

PCLiS by counting stained cells. Incubations <strong>of</strong> 1 to 100 μM Wy-14,643 resulted<br />

in a concentration-dependent increase <strong>of</strong> proliferating cells up to a factor <strong>of</strong> 1.5fold<br />

compared to the control. This study demonstrated a pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> principle for the<br />

detection <strong>of</strong> xenobiotic-induced induction <strong>of</strong> cell proliferation in PCLiS.<br />

1005 EVALUATION OF XENOBOTIC METABOLISM IN<br />

HUMAN RECONSTRUCTED SKIN MODELS FOR<br />

GENOTOXICITY TESTING.<br />

C. Jaeckh 1 , V. Blatz 1 , E. Fabian 1 , K. Reisinger 2 , B. van Ravenzwaay 1 , S. Trappe 3<br />

and R. Landsiedel 1 . 1 BASF SE, Experimental <strong>Toxicology</strong> and Ecology, Ludwigshafen,<br />

Germany, 2 Henkel AG and Co., KGaA, Duesseldorf, Germany and 3 Bundesinstitut<br />

for Risikobewertung, Berlin, Germany.<br />

Skin models are used to assess the irritation potential <strong>of</strong> chemicals. Chemicals and<br />

their metabolites are also reported to induce DNA-damage. Information on chemical<br />

biotransformation within the skin is therefore demanded for genotoxicity testing.<br />

Metabolic capacities <strong>of</strong> native rat, human and, porcine skin have been reviewed<br />

by Oesch et al. 2007. Less is known about the metabolic capacity <strong>of</strong> human reconstructed<br />

skin models, a potential alternative in vitro test system to replace rodent in<br />

vivo testing.<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate enzymatic activities <strong>of</strong> three reconstructed<br />

skin models compared to native human skin with the perspective to select<br />

a regulatory accepted human skin model for genotoxicity testing. Enzyme activities<br />

were investigated by incubation <strong>of</strong> model substrates within S9 or microsomal fractions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the epidermal skin model EpiDerm(MatTek), the full-thickness skin<br />

model EpiDermFT(MatTek) and the Phenion® full-thickness models<br />

Phenion®FT (Henkel). Selected enzymes included CYP-enzymes, Flavin- dependent<br />

monooxygenases, UDP-glucuronyltransferase as well as N-acetyltransferases.<br />

Contradictive to reported CYP-enzyme transcription, CYP-enzyme activities remained<br />

under the limit <strong>of</strong> quantification. FMO, UDP-GT and NAT–catalyzed reactions<br />

were quantified in all reconstructed skin models, however with differing<br />

catalytic activity. In summary, EpiDerm, EpiDermFT and Phenion®FT<br />

show certain metabolic capacities. Catalytic activities differ between the skin models<br />

and in between skin layers. <strong>The</strong> results obtained recommend the use <strong>of</strong> fullthickness<br />

rather than epidermis skin models. Finally, we demonstrate that biotransforming<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> reconstructed skin models allows the detection <strong>of</strong> genotoxic<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> promutagenic substances using the COMET Assay. We acknowledge<br />

funding from the German Federal Institute <strong>of</strong> Research and Education (BMBF;<br />

0315226D).<br />

1006 CUTANEOUS METABOLISM.<br />

J. Eilstein, G. Léreaux, J. Meunier, J. Leclaire and D. Duché. Life Sciences<br />

Research-Safety Research Department, L’Oréal Advance Research, Aulnay-sous-Bois,<br />

France. Sponsor: H. Toutain.<br />

According to the literature, the metabolism <strong>of</strong> other organs than the liver such the<br />

skin seems much less studied. Indeed, skin represents the major protective barrier <strong>of</strong><br />

the body to the environment and chemicals exposure but is not really yet consid-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!