27.07.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

histone deacetylase that is necessary for peroxisome proliferator activated-receptor<br />

alpha mediated gene induction. <strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> the current study was to determine<br />

whether tBHQ induces drug transporter expression in hepatocytes via a Sirt1-dependent<br />

mechanism. Primary hepatocytes were isolated from male wild-type or hepatocyte-specific<br />

Sirt1 knockout mice (Sirt1-KO) by a two-step perfusion. After<br />

plating on collagen-coated plates, cells were treated with tBHQ (100μM) for 24<br />

hours, and then total RNA was isolated. <strong>The</strong> mRNA expression levels were quantified<br />

by quantitative real-time PCR. tBHQ increased Peroxisome proliferator-activated<br />

receptor alpha (Ppar-α),Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma<br />

coactivator-1α(Pgc-1α) as well as Nad(p)h:quinone oxidoreductase(Nqo1) and<br />

multidrug resistance-associated protein (Mrp)2,3 mRNA expression in wild-type<br />

hepatocytes, but this induction was attenuated in Sirt1-KO hepatocytes. In summary,<br />

tBHQ is a known activator <strong>of</strong> the Nrf2 signaling pathway in primary hepatocytes.<br />

This induction was attenuated in the Sirt1-KO hepatocytes, which may be<br />

due to decreased Pgc1-α and Ppar-α expression or Sirt1-dependent modulation <strong>of</strong><br />

Nrf2 activity. (NIH 3R01ES016042)<br />

415 RESPONSE OF NRF2-MODULATED GENES TO<br />

CIGARETTE SMOKE.<br />

B. Kosmider, E. Messier, H. Chu and R. J. Mason. National Jewish Health,<br />

Denver, CO.<br />

Oxidative stress caused by cigarette smoke (CS) directly causes lung injury and cell<br />

death in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Moreover, many studies show that<br />

second-hand smoke can have harmful effects on nonsmokers and even cause them<br />

to develop lung cancer and heart disease. <strong>The</strong> epithelium is the barrier between inhaled<br />

air, which contains toxic compounds in cigarette smoke and the underlying<br />

tissue. To study CS-induced cell injury we analyzed human primary alveolar type II<br />

(ATII) cells and alveolar macrophages isolated from deidentified healthy, nonsmoker,<br />

smoker and ex-smoker lung donors. We compared expression <strong>of</strong> Nrf2, and<br />

its repressor Keap1 and Nrf2-dependent genes such as HO-1 and NQO1 in these<br />

cells by western blotting, RT-PCR and immunocyt<strong>of</strong>luorescence. We found higher<br />

Nrf2 expression in smokers and ex-smokers in comparison with non-smokers.<br />

Moreover, we also analyzed Nrf2 localization in ATII cells and in lung tissue. We<br />

observed Nrf2 translocation to the nucleus in smokers in comparison with nonsmokers.<br />

This suggests Nrf2 activation by reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced<br />

by cigarette smoke. <strong>The</strong>se results indicate oxidative stress and DNA damage.<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> the pathways whereby cigarette smoke generates ROS and induces<br />

apoptosis may further our understanding <strong>of</strong> the pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> cigarette smoke-induced<br />

lung disease. This work is supported by a Young Clinical Scientist Faculty<br />

Award to Beata Kosmider from the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute.<br />

416 INDIRUBIN-3’-(2, 3 DIHYDROXYPROPYL)-<br />

OXIMETHER (E804) IS A POTENT AHR-AGONIST AND<br />

MODULATOR OF INFLAMMATION PROFILES IN LPS-<br />

TREATED RAW264.7 MACROPHAGES.<br />

A. S. Babcock and C. D. Rice. Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.<br />

Multiple indirubins have been synthesized and shown to inhibit cyclin-dependent<br />

kinases (CDKs) and glycogen-synthase kinase (GSK-3β) with varying degrees <strong>of</strong><br />

potency. Several indirubins are also aryl hybrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonists, and<br />

as with CDK and GSK-3β inhibitory activities <strong>of</strong> indirubin derivatives, AhR activities<br />

cover a wide range <strong>of</strong> potency. One indirubin in particular, Indirubin-3’-(2,3<br />

dihydroxypropyl)-oximether (E804) demonstrates novel activity against STAT3<br />

signaling. This is significant because STAT3 signaling is the primary means by<br />

which IL-10 mediates its anti-inflammatory actions. Furthermore, IFN-γ induced<br />

MHC-II expression and antigen presentation are suppressed by IL-10 through<br />

STAT3 signaling. To date, there are no published studies describing the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

E804 on AhR signaling, nor has this compound been investigated for its potential<br />

as an anti-inflammatory agent in macrophage-targeted initiatives to modulate inflammation.<br />

We found that E804 induces the expression <strong>of</strong> CYP1A, AhR, and<br />

COX-2 in the murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7 in a manner similar to that<br />

induced by PCB-126. Induction <strong>of</strong> COX-2 by E804 suggests a pro-inflammatory<br />

property, therefore the expression <strong>of</strong> iNOS, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and p65 in cells cotreated<br />

with LPS were examined, but found to be suppressed. Using a focus qRT-<br />

PCR array, we compared E804 and PCB-126 for their effects on expression <strong>of</strong> a<br />

suite <strong>of</strong> genes associated with inflammation and toxicity. In most cases those genes<br />

up-regulated by LPS treatment are suppressed by E804 and PCB-126. Collectively,<br />

these data indicate that E804 is a potent AhR ligand and modulator <strong>of</strong> proinflammatory<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles in the murine macrophage line RAW264.7 treated with LPS. As<br />

with other potent AhR ligands, E804 may exert its effects by altering developmental<br />

pathways: in macrophages this may contribute to differences between M1- and<br />

M2- like phenotypes.<br />

417 REFORMING THE TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL<br />

ACT (TSCA): CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND<br />

TIMING.<br />

T. Lewandowski 1 and S. Barone 2 . 1 Gradient, Seattle, WA and 2 U.S. EPA,<br />

Washington, DC.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) <strong>of</strong> 1976 significantly changed the regulatory<br />

landscape for chemicals in the United States. It gave the federal government<br />

greater powers to track the introduction <strong>of</strong> new chemicals into the consumer marketplace,<br />

provided the U.S. EPA with limited powers to require testing <strong>of</strong> new<br />

chemicals, and allowed for case-by-case restriction <strong>of</strong> chemicals shown to be particularly<br />

hazardous. Yet the basic provisions <strong>of</strong> TSCA are now 35 years old, and unlike<br />

most major environmental laws passed in the 1970s, the TSCA legal framework remains<br />

essentially unchanged. Achieving the goals <strong>of</strong> TSCA, namely to ensure that<br />

adequate data are available to allow assessment <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> chemical substances<br />

and mixtures on health and the environment has also proven difficult. <strong>The</strong> regulatory<br />

apparatus has been unable to cope with the large number <strong>of</strong> chemicals requiring<br />

evaluation, has focused on new rather than existing chemicals, has largely ignored<br />

the potential interaction <strong>of</strong> chemicals occurring in mixtures, and has<br />

generally failed to keep up with advances in technology. While once a model regulation<br />

for other nations, the TSCA framework has now been superseded by chemical<br />

safety regulations adopted by other jurisdictions (e.g., REACH). Given the dramatic<br />

changes in chemical technology, toxicology, and risk assessment that are<br />

expected to occur in the near future, reform <strong>of</strong> TSCA is seen as a high priority by<br />

many stakeholders. Issues that are likely to be addressed by reform <strong>of</strong> TSCA include<br />

the distinct toxicology and exposure scenarios posed by nanotechnology, the possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> basing hazard identification for the large number <strong>of</strong> chemicals requiring assessment<br />

on mechanistic and in vitro data rather than standard animal tests, and<br />

consideration <strong>of</strong> special population groups (not only children but also those with<br />

genetic susceptibilities or chronic health conditions). Reform <strong>of</strong> TSCA has the potential<br />

to greatly affect the way chemical risks are assessed in the U.S. and may<br />

therefore have a significant impact on the daily lives <strong>of</strong> society members.<br />

418 THE INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ON<br />

ALTERNATIVE TEST METHODS (ICATM):<br />

TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PROVIDE IMPROVED<br />

PUBLIC HEALTH SAFETY ASSESSMENT TOOLS.<br />

W. Stokes 1 and M. Wind 2 . 1 NICEATM, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC and<br />

2 Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD.<br />

In 2009, the United States, Canada, the European Union, and Japan signed a<br />

Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Cooperation for International Cooperation on Alternative Test<br />

Methods (ICATM). This agreement provides for enhanced international collaborations<br />

for the validation, evaluation, and development <strong>of</strong> internationally harmonized<br />

recommendations for new and alternative safety testing methods and strategies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> initial participating validation organizations are the NICEATM and ICC-<br />

VAM, ECVAM, JaCVAM, and Health Canada’s Environmental Health Science<br />

and Research Bureau. A Korean Center for the Validation <strong>of</strong> Alternative Methods<br />

(KoCVAM) has recently also been established and is in the process <strong>of</strong> becoming an<br />

ICATM participant. <strong>The</strong> ICATM organizations work collaboratively to promote<br />

the validation and regulatory acceptance <strong>of</strong> new, revised, and alternative test methods<br />

that are based on sound science and that will provide continued or improved<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> people, animals, and the environment while reducing, refining, and<br />

replacing the use <strong>of</strong> animals where scientifically feasible. <strong>The</strong> participating validation<br />

organizations seek to expand and strengthen cooperation, collaboration, and<br />

communications on the scientific validation and evaluation <strong>of</strong> new alternative testing<br />

methods proposed for regulatory health and safety assessments. Consistent collaborations<br />

are critical to the design and conduct <strong>of</strong> validation studies, the evaluation<br />

and independent scientific peer review <strong>of</strong> proposed test methods and the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> harmonized recommendations for national and international regulatory<br />

consideration. <strong>The</strong> enhanced international cooperation in these three areas is<br />

expected to result in more efficient test method validation and review, and more<br />

rapid national and international acceptance <strong>of</strong> scientifically valid test methods. We<br />

will provide an overview <strong>of</strong> the ICATM process along with an introduction to each<br />

participating validation organization and highlights <strong>of</strong> recent and planned ICATM<br />

contributions.<br />

SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING 89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!