27.07.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

qHTS format at concentrations ranging from 0.59 nM to 92 μM for their ability to<br />

induce this pathway in ARE-bla HepG2 cells transfected with a beta-lactamase reporter<br />

gene under the control <strong>of</strong> ARE and in HepG2 cells transfected with a luciferase<br />

reporter measuring Nrf2 specific ARE activation. Raw data were normalized<br />

relative to beta-napthth<strong>of</strong>lavone (100%) and DMSO (basal, 0%).<br />

Concentration response curves were generated for each substance, with EC50 values<br />

and efficacy calculated for substances classified as positive in either assay. We<br />

identified 364 and 44 compounds that stimulated ARE in the bla and luciferase assays,<br />

respectively, with 34 <strong>of</strong> these compounds active in both assays. Based on either<br />

a positive response in both assays or a structure-activity relationship to an active<br />

compound, we re-tested 63 compounds in the two ARE assays and also for their<br />

ability to deplete glutathione, as a downstream assay. Fifty-six out <strong>of</strong> 63 compounds<br />

were confirmed for ARE activity and several (e.g., hydroquinone) additionally depleted<br />

glutathione levels. Our results indicate the robustness <strong>of</strong> these two different<br />

approaches for assessing the ability <strong>of</strong> much larger compound libraries to induce<br />

ARE. Supported by NIEHS Interagency Agreement Y2-ES-7020-01.<br />

2502 NUCLEAR FACTOR E2-RELATED FACTOR 1 IS<br />

INVOLVED IN ARSENIC-INDUCED ANTIOXIDANT<br />

RESPONSE IN HUMAN KERATINOCYTES.<br />

R. Zhao 1 , Y. Hou 1 , P. Xue 1 , C. G. Woods 1 , J. Fu 1 , M. P. Waalkes 2 , M. E.<br />

Andersen 1 and J. Pi 1 . 1 <strong>The</strong> Hamner Institutes, Reaserach Triangle Park, NC and<br />

2 NTP, NIEHS, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC .<br />

Human exposure to inorganic arsenic, a potent oxidative stressor, causes various<br />

dermal disorders, including hyperkeratosis and skin cancer. Nuclear factor E2-related<br />

factor 1 (NRF1) plays a critical role in regulating the expression <strong>of</strong> many antioxidant<br />

response element (ARE)-dependent genes. <strong>The</strong> current study investigates<br />

the role <strong>of</strong> NRF1 in arsenic-induced antioxidant response and cytotoxicity in cultured<br />

human keratinocytes. In HaCaT cells, inorganic arsenite (iAs3+) enhanced<br />

the protein accumulation <strong>of</strong> long is<strong>of</strong>orms (120-140 kDa) <strong>of</strong> NRF1 in a dose- and<br />

time-dependent fashion. <strong>The</strong> long is<strong>of</strong>orms <strong>of</strong> NRF1 induced by iAs3+ were<br />

mainly accumulated in nucleus <strong>of</strong> HaCaT cells. Selective deficiency <strong>of</strong> NRF1 by<br />

lentiviral shRNAs in HaCaT cells (NRF1-KD) led to decreased expression <strong>of</strong> γ-glutamatecysteine<br />

ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC) and regulatory subunit (GCLM)<br />

and a reduced level <strong>of</strong> intracellular glutathione. In response to acute iAs3+ exposure,<br />

induction <strong>of</strong> some ARE-dependent genes, including NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase<br />

1 (NQO1), GCLC and GCLM, was significantly attenuated in<br />

NRF1-KD cells. However, the iAs3–induced expression <strong>of</strong> heme oxygenase 1<br />

(HMOX-1) was unaltered by silencing <strong>of</strong> NRF1, suggesting HMOX-1 is not regulated<br />

by NRF1. In addition, lack <strong>of</strong> NRF1 in HaCaT cells did not disturb iAs3+induced<br />

NRF2 accumulation, but noticeably decreased KEAP1 protein levels<br />

under basal and iAs3+-exposed conditions, suggesting a potential interaction between<br />

NRF1 and KEAP1. Consistent with the critical role <strong>of</strong> NRF1 in the transcriptional<br />

regulation <strong>of</strong> some ARE-bearing genes, knockdown <strong>of</strong> NRF1 significantly<br />

increased iAs3+-induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis. <strong>The</strong> current study, for<br />

the first time, demonstrates that long is<strong>of</strong>orms <strong>of</strong> NRF1 contribute to arsenic-induced<br />

antioxidant response in human keratinocytes and protect the cells from acute<br />

arsenic cytotoxicity.<br />

2503 BENEFICIAL ROLE OF NRF2 IN REGULATING NADPH<br />

GENERATION AND CONSUMPTION.<br />

K. C. Wu, J. Y. Cui and C. D. Klaassen. Pharmacology, <strong>Toxicology</strong>, and<br />

<strong>The</strong>rapeutics, University <strong>of</strong> Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.<br />

Nrf2 (nuclear factor E2 p45-related factor 2) is a central regulator that promotes<br />

the transcription <strong>of</strong> cytoprotective genes in response to oxidative and electrophilic<br />

stresses. Most functions <strong>of</strong> Nrf2 were identified by studying biological models with<br />

Nrf2 deficiency, however, little is known about the effects <strong>of</strong> graded Nrf2 activation.<br />

In the present study, hepatic phenotypes as well as genomic gene expression<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles by microarray analysis were characterized with a ‘gene dose-response’ model<br />

in livers <strong>of</strong> Nrf2-null mice, wild-type mice, Keap1-knockdown (Keap1-KD) mice<br />

with enhanced Nrf2 activation, and Keap1-hepatocyte knockout (Keap1-HKO)<br />

mice with maximum hepatic Nrf2 activation. Hepatic nuclear Nrf2 protein, glutathione<br />

concentrations, and known Nrf2 target genes were increased dose dependently.<br />

In total, 115 genes were identified to be constitutively induced and 80 genes<br />

suppressed with graded Nrf2 activation. Specifically, mRNA <strong>of</strong> genes encoding enzymes<br />

in the pentose phosphate pathway as well as malic enzyme were low with<br />

Nrf2 deficiency and high with Nrf2 activation, indicating that Nrf2 is important<br />

for NADPH production. NADPH is the major reducing power in the body to<br />

scavenge oxidative stress including regenerating glutathione and thioredoxin, and is<br />

also used for anabolic pathways including lipid synthesis. HPLC-UV analysis confirmed<br />

that hepatic NADPH concentration was lowest in Nrf2-null mice and highest<br />

in Keap1-HKO mice. In addition, genes involved in fatty acid synthesis and de-<br />

536 SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING<br />

saturation were down-regulated with graded Nrf2 activation. In conclusion, the<br />

present study suggests that Nrf2 fights against environmental insults to benefit cell<br />

survival by promoting the generation <strong>of</strong> NADPH, and by pushing its consumption<br />

into the direction <strong>of</strong> scavenging oxidative stress rather than fatty acid synthesis and<br />

desaturation. (Supported by NIH grants ES-09649, ES-09716, ES-07079,<br />

DK081461, and RR-021940)<br />

2504 ASSESSMENT OF NANOPARTICLE EXPOSURE IN<br />

OCCUPATIONAL SETTINGS AND IN INHALATION<br />

TOXICOLOGY STUDIES: IS THERE A BEST<br />

DOSEMETRIC TO USE?<br />

D. B. Warheit 1 and G. Oberdorster 2 . 1 DuPont Haskell Global Centers, Wilmington,<br />

DE and 2 University <strong>of</strong> Rochester, Rochester, NY.<br />

Nanotechnology involves the design and manipulation <strong>of</strong> materials at the nanoscale<br />

size range. <strong>The</strong> capacity for assessing hazards or quantifying exposures to engineered<br />

nanomaterials for workers or consumers is limited, and may require new or<br />

different methodologies to provide information for effective risk assessment and<br />

risk management. Exposure assessments are important components for determining<br />

health risks. However, currently used methodologies are inadequate for quantifying<br />

nanoparticulate exposures, because most <strong>of</strong> the occupational exposure data is<br />

represented in the gravimetric form <strong>of</strong> mass/volume <strong>of</strong> sampled air. Our goal is to<br />

address this controversial issue with a focus on practicability <strong>of</strong> measurements<br />

under workplace conditions. <strong>The</strong>refore it is important to discuss the proposed<br />

change in dose metrics for inhalation toxicity studies with engineered aerosolized<br />

amorphous silica nanoparticles. Accordingly, rats were exposed to freshly generated<br />

nanoparticles at two different particle size ranges. <strong>The</strong> particle aerosols were characterized<br />

by particle numbers using SMPS technology. Our panel <strong>of</strong> experts will address<br />

the merits <strong>of</strong> using surface area metrics based on measurements <strong>of</strong> particle<br />

numbers and material-specific density for quantifying particle exposures and their<br />

use for risk assessment. Our panel will present real-time instrumentation for measuring<br />

airborne particle surface area and morphology <strong>of</strong> nanoparticle agglomerates—two<br />

<strong>of</strong> the important metrics for toxicity evaluation. In addition, recent exposure<br />

assessments in manufacturing facilities involving silicon nanoparticles and<br />

carbon nanotubes will be presented. It is also important to note the effect <strong>of</strong> agglomerate<br />

structure size on the bioactivity <strong>of</strong> nanoparticles and present current<br />

methods used to disperse nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo testing which we will<br />

address. Finally, we will discuss methods to convert in vivo lung burdens to appropriate<br />

in vitro test concentrations <strong>of</strong> nanoparticles for hazard screening.<br />

2505 PROGRESS OF THE TOX21 CONSORTIUM IN HIGH-<br />

THROUGHPUT BIOACTIVITY PROFILING OF<br />

CHEMICALS.<br />

R. Kavlock 1 and C. Austin 2 . 1 U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC and 2 NIH<br />

Chemical Genomics Center, Gaithersburg, MD.<br />

In 2008, the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Environmental Health Sciences/National<br />

<strong>Toxicology</strong> Program, the NIH Chemical Genomics Center, and the U.S. EPA’s<br />

National Center for Computational <strong>Toxicology</strong> entered into a Memorandum <strong>of</strong><br />

Understanding to collaborate on the research, development, validation, and translation<br />

<strong>of</strong> new and innovative test methods to characterize key steps in toxicity pathways.<br />

<strong>The</strong> U.S. FDA joined this consortium in 2010. A central component is the<br />

exploration <strong>of</strong> high-throughput screening, as well as high-throughput whole<br />

genome analytical methods, to evaluate mechanisms <strong>of</strong> toxicity. <strong>The</strong> goals <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Tox21 Community are to investigate the use <strong>of</strong> these new tools, along with existing<br />

chemical and biological information, to prioritize substances for further in-depth<br />

toxicological evaluation, identify mechanisms <strong>of</strong> action for further investigation,<br />

and develop predictive models for in vivo biological response. Success is expected to<br />

result in test methods for toxicity testing that are more mechanistically based and<br />

economically efficient; as a consequence, a reduction or replacement <strong>of</strong> animals in<br />

regulatory testing is anticipated to occur in parallel with an increased ability to evaluate<br />

the large numbers <strong>of</strong> chemicals that currently lack adequate toxicological evaluation.<br />

In the past year, Tox21 has completed assembly <strong>of</strong> a library <strong>of</strong> ~10,000<br />

chemicals and began screening the library against molecular targets and pathways at<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> one assay per week. Our panel <strong>of</strong> experts will inform the scientific community<br />

<strong>of</strong> progress in meeting the Tox21 goals, by focusing on the strategies for<br />

chemical and assay selection, workflows for data management and analysis, and understanding<br />

the human significance <strong>of</strong> results. <strong>The</strong> Tox21 effort represents the<br />

largest and most comprehensive evaluation <strong>of</strong> interaction <strong>of</strong> environmental chemicals<br />

with toxicity pathways and is helping to pave the way for the use <strong>of</strong> highthroughput<br />

screening tools in hazard identification, chemical prioritization, and<br />

risk assessment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!