27.07.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for risk identification and characterization relative to allergic and autoimmune disease<br />

(e.g., examining general vs. more susceptible subpopulations and disease induction<br />

vs. disease exacerbation). This presentation will discuss allergic vs. autoimmune<br />

responses, potential biomarkers for identifying chemical and drug hazards,<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> inflammation in these responses and options for revised safety<br />

testing that could improve risk assessment for these chronic conditions.<br />

2685 MECHANISMS UNDERLYING HEXACHLOROBENZENE-<br />

INDUCED IMMUNOTOXICITY: COMPARISON WITH<br />

IDIOSYNCRATIC DRUG REACTIONS.<br />

J. Ezendam 1 and R. Pieters 2 . 1 National Institute for Public Health and the<br />

Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands and 2 Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences,<br />

Utrecht, Netherlands.<br />

<strong>The</strong> toxicity <strong>of</strong> hexachlorobenzene (HCB) was discovered in the 1950s after an accidental<br />

poisoning in Turkey. Some symptoms, such as enlarged lymph nodes and<br />

arthritis, were indicative for immunotoxicity. In rats, orally exposed to HCB several<br />

immunological parameters were enhanced, including increased spleen and lymph<br />

node weights, enhancement <strong>of</strong> humoral responses and induction <strong>of</strong> inflammatory<br />

skin and lung lesions. <strong>The</strong> increased autoantibody levels and modulation <strong>of</strong> experimental<br />

autoimmune diseases might indicate that HCB could induce autoimmunity,<br />

similar to idiosyncratic drug reactions. Drugs like D-penicillamine and nevirapine<br />

induce skin lesions and autoimmune phenomena as well. In the etiology <strong>of</strong><br />

these diseases T cells and macrophages are involved. <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> macrophages and T<br />

cells in HCB-induced immunostimulation has been studied in Brown Norways<br />

(BN) rats. After depletion <strong>of</strong> T cells with Cyclosporin A (CsA) in rats orally exposed<br />

to HCB, the onset <strong>of</strong> skin lesion was delayed and splenomegaly was prevented<br />

partly. <strong>The</strong> rise in IgE and autoantibody levels and lung eosinophilia were prevented<br />

completely. However, adoptive transfer experiments showed that the disease<br />

could not be transferred to naïve recipients, demonstrating that HCB does not induce<br />

specific T cell sensitization. Depletion <strong>of</strong> macrophages with clodronate-liposomes<br />

prevented <strong>of</strong> HCB-induced skin and lung lesions partly and inhibited elevation<br />

<strong>of</strong> autoantibodies. <strong>The</strong> involvement <strong>of</strong> the innate immune system in<br />

HCB-induced immune effects was further confirmed in a microarray study,<br />

demonstrating that HCB activated several innate immune pathways. In conclusion,<br />

HCB exposure induced a systemic inflammatory response, probably triggered by<br />

macrophage activation. Subsequently, T cells are polyclonally activated and clinical<br />

signs develop. In contrast, idiosyncratic reactions involve macrophages and T cells<br />

as well, but this disease is induced after specific T cell sensitization.<br />

2686 AUTOIMMUNITY IN IDIOSYNCRATIC DRUG<br />

REACTIONS.<br />

J. Uetrecht. University <strong>of</strong> Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.<br />

Idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) represent a major problem because at present<br />

there is no way to accurately predict which drug candidates will cause such reactions<br />

nor which patients are at risk. This unpredictability is largely due to a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

mechanistic understanding. Many IDRs are clearly immune-mediated but this is<br />

not always the case, and some have characteristics that are atypical for an immune<br />

response. Most drugs associated with a high incidence <strong>of</strong> IDRs can cause different<br />

types <strong>of</strong> IDRs in different people, e.g. propylthiouracil can cause liver injury, agranulocytosis<br />

or a lupus-like autoimmune syndrome. On a molecular level, drugs induce<br />

a mixture <strong>of</strong> antibodies: some against various drug-modified proteins and also<br />

autoantibodies against native proteins with a different pattern in each patient. This<br />

is not surprising because each person has a different repertoire <strong>of</strong> major histocompatibility<br />

antigens and T cell receptors, and it is expected that the highest affinity<br />

recognition would be different in each individual. <strong>The</strong> typical characteristics <strong>of</strong> an<br />

immune-mediated reaction include a delay between starting the drug and the onset<br />

<strong>of</strong> the adverse event but a rapid onset with rechallenge. <strong>The</strong> time to onset varies<br />

with the type <strong>of</strong> IDR with rashes typically occurring after a week or so, liver injury<br />

after a month or so and autoimmune IDRs <strong>of</strong>ten requiring more than a year <strong>of</strong><br />

drug exposure before the onset <strong>of</strong> autoimmunity. This long delay in the onset <strong>of</strong> an<br />

autoimmune reaction is presumably due to mechanisms that usually prevent autoimmunity.<br />

In addition, autoimmune responses are not always associated with an<br />

amnestic response, possibly for the same reason. Two animal models <strong>of</strong> drug induced<br />

autoimmunity: penicillamine in rats and propylthiouracil in cats do not display<br />

an amnestic response. Thus the variability in the nature <strong>of</strong> IDRs is most easily<br />

explained by an immune mechanism, and features such as a long delay in onset and<br />

a lack <strong>of</strong> amnestic response are consistent with an autoimmune component. Valid<br />

animal models would greatly facilitate mechanistic studies but variability also<br />

makes development <strong>of</strong> such models a challenge. Supported by grants from CIHR.<br />

2687 TRICHLOROETHYLENE-INDUCED AUTOIMMUNITY;<br />

DEPENDENCE ON METABOLISM AND GENETIC<br />

SUSCEPTIBILITY.<br />

K. Gilbert 1, 2 . 1 Microbiology and Immunology, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research<br />

Institute, Little Rock, AR and 2 University <strong>of</strong> Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little<br />

Rock, AR.<br />

MRL +/+ mice exposed to occupationally relevant doses <strong>of</strong> the environmental contaminant<br />

trichloroethylene (TCE) for 32 weeks developed T cell-mediated autoimmune<br />

hepatitis, accompanied by the expansion <strong>of</strong> IFN-γ-producing and apoptosisresistant<br />

(CD44 hi CD62L lo ) CD4 + T cells. TCE-induced alteration in CD4 + cell<br />

activity required metabolism, and could be mimicked by exposure to the TCE<br />

metabolite trichloroacetaldehyde hydrate (TCAH). However, TCAH did not induce<br />

autoimmune hepatitis, but instead promoted skin inflammation and hair loss<br />

similar to autoimmune alopecia in MRL+/+ mice. Unlike MRL+/+ mice, genetically-related<br />

C3H/HeJ mice exposed to TCAH did not develop alopecia or altered<br />

CD4 + T cell function. Interestingly, microarray analysis revealed that CD4 + T cells<br />

from MRL+/+ mice had a much higher constitutive expression <strong>of</strong> the osteopontincoding<br />

gene Spp1 than cells from C3H/HeJ mice. TCAH appears to further increase<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> Spp1 as well as genes for other proinflammatory cytokines (e.g.<br />

IFN-γ). Thus, it appears that altered constitutive as well as toxicant-induced expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> certain CD4 + T cell genes may increase susceptibility to the immunotoxicity<br />

<strong>of</strong> TCE and its metabolite TCAH.<br />

2688 PBPK MODEL USE IN RISK ASSESSMENT: WHY BEING<br />

PUBLISHED IS NOT ENOUGH.<br />

E. D. McLanahan. ORD/NCEA, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

While publication <strong>of</strong> a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model in a<br />

peer-review journal is a mark <strong>of</strong> good science, evaluation <strong>of</strong> published models and<br />

the supporting computer code can identify issues or shortcomings that can be barriers<br />

to their use in risk assessment. <strong>The</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> human health risk assessments<br />

must be sustained, including use <strong>of</strong> appropriate PBPK models and other quantitative<br />

tools for dose-response evaluation and interspecies extrapolation. A published<br />

model can be modified to address assessment-specific issues, and having clear criteria<br />

can reduce the number <strong>of</strong> review and revision iterations and hence the time<br />

needed to bring a model to application. As probabilistic (population) PBPK models<br />

are being implemented, parameter choices to fully characterize population variability<br />

become critical. Thus a thorough but efficient process for the review and implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> PBPK models is necessary. While a typical process and set <strong>of</strong> criteria<br />

were created specifically for PBPK models, the principles may be applied to other<br />

types <strong>of</strong> computational models (e.g., dose-response) as they are developed. We have<br />

convened a panel <strong>of</strong> experts in biologically-based modeling and relevant quantitative<br />

methods to not only describe and discuss model evaluation and criteria, but<br />

also issues and choices that arise in model application and assuring reasonable certainty,<br />

as well as computational tools now available for improving model quality.<br />

Addressing issues identified during the review and application <strong>of</strong> PBPK models for<br />

human health risk assessments provides an opportunity to improve the science <strong>of</strong><br />

PBPK modeling as a whole. Attendees will obtain knowledge to improve their models<br />

for use in risk assessment, evaluate when and how a model can be applied with a<br />

fair degree <strong>of</strong> certainty, and better understand the constraints and requirements that<br />

may otherwise limit use <strong>of</strong> a PBPK model. Finally, we will conclude with a panel<br />

discussion and dialogue on the criteria, processes, methods, and choices that can<br />

best assure the use <strong>of</strong> quality PBPK models in future risk assessments.<br />

2689 A PROCESS FOR THE EVALUATION AND<br />

IMPLEMENTATION OF PBPK MODELS IN HUMAN<br />

HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENTS.<br />

H. A. El-Masri. NHEERL, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

An example process for the review and implementation <strong>of</strong> PBPK models in human<br />

health risk assessments was developed. <strong>The</strong> process is intended to be rigorous and<br />

comprehensive, yet efficient. A collaborative effort between the agency conducting<br />

the risk assessment and its contractors is suggested, as well as engaging the original<br />

authors <strong>of</strong> the models being evaluated. Several common errors identified in models<br />

being evaluated for use in risk assessments will be discussed, with ways authors can<br />

improve the potential for model use. Other models have not been implemented as<br />

published for practical reasons that will be described. <strong>The</strong> ultimate goal <strong>of</strong> this presentation<br />

is to inform and advise authors how to produce models that are more<br />

likely to be usable “<strong>of</strong>f-the-shelf” for assessment purposes.<br />

SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING 575

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!