27.07.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

concentrations in plasma or liver tissue. This two compartment model was compared<br />

with a 10-compartment model composed <strong>of</strong> 5 sequential blood compartments<br />

each connected to a liver tissue compartment. Gor some compounds the two<br />

models gave very similar results, but differences were observed for compounds with<br />

high active uptake. <strong>The</strong> multicompartment liver model is an approximation for the<br />

dispersion or tube models. <strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> the analyses have been for published<br />

human intravenous plasma pr<strong>of</strong>iles, but modeling for the rat has been completed<br />

for a more limited set <strong>of</strong> compounds. In addition to modeling the in vivo data to<br />

obtain estimates for the various processes, in vitro data from human liver microsomes<br />

and sandwich cultured hepatocytes have been used. Comparisons <strong>of</strong> predictions<br />

for plasma concentration pr<strong>of</strong>iles based upon in vitro results have been made<br />

to estimate in vitro to in vivo extrapolation factors. <strong>The</strong> in vitro to in vivo extrapolation<br />

factors vary for the different processes being scaled. <strong>The</strong> analyses demonstrate<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> capturing mechanistic biological processes in pharmacokinetic modeling<br />

to improve the ability to predict pharmacokinetic disposition.<br />

939 A NOVEL PREDICTIVE PLATFORM FOR DILI: A<br />

COMBINATION OF IN SILICO AND IN VITRO<br />

METHODS TO PREDICT TOXICITY MECHANISMS<br />

IN VIVO.<br />

S. Das, R. Kumar, S. Raghavan and K. Subramanian. Strand Life Sciences,<br />

Bangalore, India.<br />

Prediction <strong>of</strong> hepatotoxicity is still a challenge in the drug development process.<br />

Currently available methods are inadequate both for extrapolation <strong>of</strong> rodent information<br />

to humans as well as in predicting the likelihood <strong>of</strong> idiosyncratic liver injury.<br />

Species used in preclinical toxicity do not usually possess underlying aberrations<br />

leading to idiosyncratic toxicity observed in humans in the clinic.<br />

We have developed a dynamic systems model <strong>of</strong> the rat liver to predict DILI. <strong>The</strong><br />

metabolic network modeled integrates the biology behind different types <strong>of</strong> drug<br />

induced toxicity. Important biological processes involved in fat metabolism (steatosis),<br />

energy homeostasis (necrosis), oxidative stress (oxidative damage) are modeled<br />

quantitatively. A set <strong>of</strong> differential equations predict changes in metabolite concentrations<br />

<strong>The</strong> model was first validated by comparing model predictions under conditions<br />

<strong>of</strong> normal liver homeostasis and DILI with observations published in the<br />

literature. We then used the model to generate hypotheses for the mechanism behind<br />

idiosyncratic toxicity caused by the anti-diabetic drug troglitazone.<br />

Sensitivity analysis <strong>of</strong> the metabolic network identified a set <strong>of</strong> enzymes that are<br />

predicted to be key players in causing different types <strong>of</strong> DILI. In vitro measurements<br />

<strong>of</strong> these enzyme rates, using a primary hepatocyte system, in absence and<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> well-known hepatotoxic drugs, are used as input to the model. Model<br />

simulated outputs <strong>of</strong> toxicity for each drug matched well with the associated toxic<br />

phenotype reported in the literature. <strong>The</strong> validation <strong>of</strong> this combinatorial (in silico<br />

and in vitro) approach using known hepatotoxic drugs e.g. Dicl<strong>of</strong>enac,<br />

Cyclosporin, Tamoxifen, etc. yielded additional novel mechanistic insights.<br />

<strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> study is to develop a generalized liver toxicity prediction platform<br />

integrating in vitro and in silico approaches. Such an approach allows us to predict<br />

toxicity, generate mechanistic insights, and mechanism specific biomarkers.<br />

940 APPLICATIONS OF A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL FOR<br />

PREDICTING DRUG INDUCED LIVER INJURY (DILI).<br />

B. A. Howell 1 , R. Kumar 3 , L. Wennerberg 3 , Y. Yang 2 , R. Ho 3 , A. Harrill 1 , C.<br />

L. Kurtz 1 , M. E. Andersen 2 , H. J. Clewell 2 , S. Q. Siler 3 and P. B. Watkins 1 .<br />

1 Drug Safety Sciences, <strong>The</strong> Hamner Institutes, Research Triangle Park, NC,<br />

2 Chemical Safety Sciences, <strong>The</strong> Hamner Institutes, Research Triangle Park, NC and<br />

3 Entelos, Inc., Foster City, CA.<br />

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the adverse drug event that most frequently<br />

leads to termination <strong>of</strong> clinical development programs and regulatory actions on<br />

drugs. We have developed a predictive model based on physiological processes involved<br />

in DILI, focusing initially on acetaminophen toxicity. A physiologically<br />

based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to describe the disposition<br />

and metabolism <strong>of</strong> APAP. Reactive metabolite production and subsequent covalent<br />

protein binding are characterized. Glutathione (GSH) depletion and synthesis, oxidative<br />

stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and the cell life cycle, including regeneration<br />

and death, are modeled. <strong>The</strong> model accurately reproduced APAP pharmacokinetic<br />

measures and GSH depletion/recovery for rats, mice, and humans, and this<br />

explained much <strong>of</strong> the variation in species specific susceptibility to APAP induced<br />

DILI. In-depth comparisons were also made between rats and mice with regard to<br />

their ability to re-synthesize GSH after GSH depletion. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> N-acetyl-cysteine<br />

(NAC) as a treatment for APAP overdose was incorporated into the model,<br />

and treatment times were analyzed and compared to standard clinical practices to<br />

predict optimal NAC use. Finally, the model was used to successfully predict the<br />

species differences in hepatotoxicity <strong>of</strong> methapyrilene using in vitro to in vivo ex-<br />

200 SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING<br />

trapolation. <strong>The</strong> absorption, distribution, and metabolism <strong>of</strong> methapyrilene were<br />

estimated from the physical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the compound and in vitro metabolism.<br />

<strong>The</strong> model correctly predicted that rats would be less sensitive to acetaminophen<br />

than mice or humans, but most sensitive to methapyrilene. A parametric<br />

search for in silico rats, mice, and humans susceptible to methapyrilene DILI predicted<br />

that methapyrilene would cause very little hepatotoxicity in humans clinically.<br />

This finding agrees with clinical reports.<br />

941 DEVELOPMENT OF A PBPK/PD MODEL FOR<br />

ACETAMINOPHEN TOXICITY IN RATS.<br />

Y. Yang, B. Howell, M. Yoon, M. Andersen and H. J. Clewell. <strong>The</strong> Hamner<br />

Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

A whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic<br />

(PBPK/PD) model for acetaminophen (APAP) and its metabolites in the rat was<br />

developed to quantitatively describe the processes that determine APAP hepatotoxicity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> key features <strong>of</strong> the model include metabolic activation <strong>of</strong> APAP by cytochrome<br />

P450s, detoxication <strong>of</strong> APAP via sulfate and glucuronide conjugation,<br />

and binding <strong>of</strong> the reactive metabolite N-acethyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI)<br />

to hepatic glutathione (GSH) and cellular macromolecules. Both sulfate and glucuronide<br />

conjugation was described using Michaelis Menten equations. Sulfation<br />

was modeled as a high affinity, low capacity pathway, while glucuronidation was described<br />

as a low affinity, high capacity pathway. A description <strong>of</strong> the depletion <strong>of</strong><br />

the c<strong>of</strong>actor for sulfation (PAPS) and its precursor inorganic sulfate was required to<br />

properly simulate APAP-sulfate concentrations in the rat blood. Enterohepatic recirculation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the conjugates was also included. <strong>The</strong> net production <strong>of</strong> NAPQI is<br />

determined by the balance between the bioactivation via cytochrome P450s and the<br />

detoxification by conjugation with GSH. <strong>The</strong> model also describes the resulting depletion<br />

and recovery <strong>of</strong> GSH by incorporating a feed-back regulation <strong>of</strong> GSH synthesis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> model successfully simulated concentration-time pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> APAP, sulfate<br />

and glucuronide conjugates <strong>of</strong> APAP after oral, intraperitoneal, and<br />

intravenous (iv) administrations ranging from 37.5 to 1000 mg/kg doses. <strong>The</strong> dosedependent<br />

changes in hepatic GSH concentrations after IV dose were also well described.<br />

This model will contribute to better understanding <strong>of</strong> the mechanism <strong>of</strong><br />

APAP hepatotoxicity by providing a tool for predicting the time-course <strong>of</strong> reactive<br />

metabolite formation and glutathione depletion in studies measuring hepatic damage<br />

and repair.<br />

942 USING ZEBRAFISH TO STUDY BENZO(A)PYRENE-<br />

MEDIATED CHANGES IN DNA METHYLATION<br />

STATUS DURING DEVELOPMENT.<br />

X. Fang 1 , C. Thornton 1 , B. E. Scheffler 2 and K. L. Willett 1 . 1 Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Pharmacology and <strong>Toxicology</strong>, the University <strong>of</strong> Mississippi, University, MS and<br />

2 Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Unit, USDA Mid South Area Genomics<br />

Laboratory, Stoneville, MS.<br />

DNA methylation is one <strong>of</strong> the epigenetic mechanisms to control gene expression<br />

and is vulnerable to in utero or early-life environmental toxicant exposures.<br />

Constitutively, we confirmed that zygote demethylation is conserved in zebrafish<br />

and characterized dynamic CpG methylation patterns in 5 genes (vasa, Ras-association<br />

domain family member 1 (RASSF1), telomerase reverse transcriptase<br />

(TERT), c-Myc and c-Jun). Direct waterborne benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) treatment at<br />

100 μg/L from ~2 to 96 hours post fertilization (hpf) to zebrafish embryos significantly<br />

decreased global cytosine 5’ methylation by 55% and gene-specifically reduced<br />

promoter CpG methylation in vasa by 17.2%. Future study will measure the<br />

vasa mRNA expression to determine correlated altered expression. However, BaP<br />

did not change CpG island methylation in RASSF1, TERT, c-Myc and c-Jun at 96<br />

hpf. To study the mechanisms <strong>of</strong> demethylaion, mRNA expression and enzyme activity<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2 methylation related enzymes, DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and<br />

glycine N-methyltransferase (GNMT), were measured constitutively and after<br />

treatment. BaP exposure at 1, 10 or 100 μg/L did not change DNMT1 and<br />

GNMT mRNA expression at 48, 60 or 96 hpf or nuclear total DNMT and cytosolic<br />

GNMT enzyme activity at 96 hpf. In summary, BaP is a potential epigenetic<br />

modifier for global and gene specific DNA methylation status in zebrafish embryos<br />

and the alteration is possibly not mediated by affecting DNMT1 and GNMT expression.<br />

(Support: NIEHS R01ES012710).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!