27.07.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

see whether both were needed or if one assay was sufficient in detecting mitochondrial<br />

impairment. <strong>The</strong> first assay uses isolated rat liver mitochondria and measures<br />

a compound’s effect on oxygen consumption. <strong>The</strong> second assay uses HepG2 cells<br />

grown in either glucose or galactose containing media. Cells grown in galactose are<br />

susceptible to mitochondrial insult, whereas cells grown in glucose are resistant. We<br />

tested three sets <strong>of</strong> compounds that were associated with different organ-specific<br />

toxicity. We tested 197 cardiac, 254 hepatic, and 83 nephritic compounds, which<br />

included both, Pfizer internal and commercially available compounds.<br />

Of the 534 compounds, 2.5 % flagged positive in isolated mitochondria as well as<br />

in galactose grown HepG2 cells, 3.5% flagged in isolated mitochondria and glucose<br />

and galactose cells, indicative <strong>of</strong> additional toxicity mechanisms. To our surprise<br />

5% <strong>of</strong> the compounds (27 total) only showed toxicity in the isolated rat liver mitochondria<br />

assay but not in HepG2 cells. We further analyzed these compounds using<br />

the Seahorse platform which measures oxygen consumption rate and extracellular<br />

acidification rate <strong>of</strong> intact cells simultaneously in real time. <strong>The</strong> mitochondrial impairment<br />

was confirmed in the Seahorse experiments when compounds were analyzed<br />

in real time. However, time course experiments revealed that cells could recover<br />

from the insult and therefore exhibited no frank cell toxicity. In summary, the<br />

current results indicate that including both assays in assessing mitochondrial toxicity<br />

is important for identifying the greatest number <strong>of</strong> compounds showing mitochondrial<br />

impairment. <strong>The</strong> mechanism behind the compensatory response warrants<br />

additional future mechanistic work.<br />

2530 JC-1 MITOCHONDRIAL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL<br />

MEASUREMENTS OF H9C2 CELLS GROWN IN<br />

GLUCOSE AND GALACTOSE CONTAINING MEDIA<br />

DOES NOT PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PREDICTIVITY<br />

TOWARDS MITOCHONDRIAL TOXICITY<br />

ASSESSMENT.<br />

P. Rana, Y. Will and S. Nadanaciva. Compound Safety Prediction, Pfizer Global<br />

Research & Development, Groton, CT.<br />

Drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity has been recognized to be a contributing factor<br />

to a variety <strong>of</strong> organ toxicities. <strong>The</strong> fact that some, but not all members <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />

drug class can induce mitochondrial dysfunction has necessitated the need<br />

to deploy predictive screens within the drug development process. One <strong>of</strong> these<br />

screens is a cell viability assay done in two types <strong>of</strong> media, one supplemented with<br />

glucose and the other with galactose. Since galactose-grown cells are more susceptible<br />

to mitochondrial toxicants than glucose-grown cells, this assay distinguishes<br />

compounds that cause toxicity primarily through mitochondrial targets from those<br />

that cause multifactorial toxicity. However, the assay cannot distinguish compounds<br />

that cause toxicity through secondary effects on mitochondria from those<br />

that cause toxicity through non-mitochondrial targets. Mitochondrial membrane<br />

potential measurements are thought to be indicative <strong>of</strong> mitochondrial impairment<br />

and can be measured in the absence <strong>of</strong> frank cytotoxicity. Here we investigated if<br />

multiplexing mitochondrial membrane potential measurements with the fluorescent<br />

dye, JC-1; together with cell viability measurements in glucose and galactosegrown<br />

H9C2 cells could provide additional value for compounds that have a multifactorial<br />

toxicity. We tested 29 drugs with well characterized mechanistic toxicity<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles. <strong>The</strong>se compounds set included compounds with different therapeutic uses<br />

i.e. antidepressants, anti-diabetic agents, anti cancers, etc. <strong>The</strong> multiplexed assay<br />

was able to detect mitochondrial toxicants correctly but did not reveal additional<br />

information regarding compounds that exhibited multifactorial toxicity; hence, JC-<br />

1 measurements did not provide additional information beyond what was detected<br />

using the cell viability assay. Thus, we conclude that even though this multiplexed<br />

assay is useful for HTS applications, it provides no additional value over the glucose-galactose<br />

cell viability assay.<br />

2531 TREATMENT OF FATTY ACIDS INCREASES THE<br />

SUSCEPTIBILITY OF CELLS TO TOXIC COMPOUND<br />

INDUCED INJURY.<br />

Y. Luo, P. Rana and Y. Will. Compound Safety Prediction, Pfizer Global Research &<br />

Development, Groton, CT.<br />

Fatty acids are important source <strong>of</strong> energy and cells are exposed to various fatty<br />

acids under physiological conditions. Excessive energy intake results in elevated levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> fatty acids or triglycerides and cause metabolic disorders such as dyslipidemia,<br />

obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes. Several lines <strong>of</strong> evidence suggest that metabolic<br />

diseases increase the susceptibility to drug induced liver injury, cardiotoxicity<br />

and renal toxicity. Regular cell culture conditions contain very low levels <strong>of</strong> fatty<br />

acids, much less that than physiological concentrations. It has never been reported<br />

whether fatty acids influence the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> cells to drug induced toxicity. <strong>The</strong><br />

aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to investigate the effects <strong>of</strong> fatty acids on drug induced toxicity.<br />

542 SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING<br />

In this study, we tested the effects <strong>of</strong> palmitate and oleic acid on the viability <strong>of</strong><br />

HepG2 cells. High concentrations <strong>of</strong> fatty acid treatment induced cell apoptosis<br />

and reduced cell viability. Subsequntly, sub-toxic and toxic concentrations <strong>of</strong> fatty<br />

acid were chosen to investigate whether fatty acids could potentiate drug induced<br />

toxicity. We incubated the cells with various concentrations <strong>of</strong> fatty acids (palmitate<br />

and oleic acid) and compounds followed by analyzing cell viability. Here we report<br />

the results for statins (simvastatin, cerivastatin, lovastatin, atrovstatin, pravastatin)<br />

and glitazones (ciglitazone, troglitazone, rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone).<br />

Furthermore, increased population with metabolic diseases pose higher risk for<br />

drug induced toxicity, and this assay may identify compounds that have higher risks<br />

in this population, individually or in combination therapy.<br />

2532 ER-STRESS AS A CONTRIBUTOR TO<br />

HEPATOTOXICITY: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCREENING<br />

PARADIGM.<br />

T. Schroeter, L. Qui, M. Pletcher and Y. Will. Compound Safety Prediction, Pfizer<br />

Global Research & Development, Groton, CT.<br />

<strong>The</strong> greatest challenge facing the pharmaceutical industry today is developing more<br />

effective decision making tools and strategies to reduce the attrition rate <strong>of</strong> novel<br />

compounds during candidate selection and clinical development. Currently, approximately<br />

24 out <strong>of</strong> 25 compounds fail in clinical trials, a situation that is unsustainable<br />

for the industry. One <strong>of</strong> the major attrition reasons is hepatotoxicity. Gene<br />

expression pr<strong>of</strong>iles associated with known idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity, revealed ER<br />

stress as an important contributor to drug-induced liver toxicity. We developed two<br />

assays to investigate whether induction <strong>of</strong> the endoplasmic reticulum stress response<br />

(ERSR) is a predictive reporter <strong>of</strong> liver toxicity. <strong>The</strong> first assay detects nuclear<br />

translocation <strong>of</strong> spliced XPB-1 by enzyme fragment complementation<br />

(DiscoveRx) and the second assay is a luciferase CHOP reporter assay.<br />

We screened 180 Pfizer internal and commercial available hepatotoxicants and 42<br />

drugs not known to cause organ toxicity in both assays. Compounds were screened<br />

in both assays at a final concentration <strong>of</strong> 150 uM. <strong>The</strong> XBP-1 screen identified 16<br />

hits. Full dose response curves were generated for all hits and we were able to confirm<br />

13 out <strong>of</strong> 16 XBP-1 hits. To our surprise, 4 (Ergocalciferol, Dipyridamole,<br />

Orphenadrine and Propanolol) <strong>of</strong> the 13 confirmed XBP-1 hits were drugs with no<br />

known organ toxicities. Of the 9 liver toxicants, 7 showed signs <strong>of</strong> cytotoxicity but<br />

so did two <strong>of</strong> the 4 drugs not known to be organ toxic. <strong>The</strong> CHOP screen identified<br />

3 hits which could all be validated. All <strong>of</strong> them are known liver toxicants<br />

(Riluzole, Colchicine and Oxybendazole) with Riluzole showing signs <strong>of</strong> cytotoxicity.<br />

Current work centers around confirmation <strong>of</strong> pathway activity <strong>of</strong> all active<br />

compounds in HepG2 cells to assist in vitro to in vivo correlation.<br />

2533 HIGH-CONTENT IMAGING ASSAY FOR DETECTING<br />

ACCUMULATION OF COMPOUNDS IN LYSOSOMES.<br />

S. Nadanaciva 1 , S. Lu 2 and Y. Will 1 . 1 Compound Safety Prediction, Pfizer Global<br />

Research & Development, Groton, CT and 2 DSRD, Pfizer Global Research &<br />

Development, La Jolla, CA.<br />

Known as the cell’s recycling center, lysosomes are essential for the degradation <strong>of</strong><br />

old organelles, endotoxins and engulfed microbes. Many enzymes which function<br />

in the acidic milieu <strong>of</strong> the lysosome are involved in degradative processes.<br />

Compounds which are lipophilic weak bases or lipophilic neutral amines can readily<br />

cross the lysosomal membrane from the cytoplasm. Once inside lysosomes,<br />

however, these compounds become protonated and are unable to cross the lysosomal<br />

membrane to re-enter the cytoplasm. <strong>The</strong> trapping <strong>of</strong> compounds within lysosomes<br />

can cause alkalinization <strong>of</strong> these organelles, resulting in lysosomal dysfunction.<br />

Hence, high-throughput screens to detect lysosomotropism, the accumulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> compounds in lysosomes, are desirable.<br />

In light <strong>of</strong> this, we developed a 96-well format multiplexed high content screening<br />

(HCS) assay that measures both lysosomotropism and cytotoxicity. <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> a<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> compounds on these two endpoints was measured in H9c2 cells by<br />

using the fluorescent dyes, LysoTracker® Red and Hoechst. Quantitative image<br />

analysis showed that lysosomotropic compounds included the antimalarial, chloroquine,<br />

antidepressants (sertraline, paroxetine, fluoxetine, imipramine, nortriptyline),<br />

antipsychotics (chlorpromazine, thioridazine), antiarrhythmics (amiodarone,<br />

propranolol), and some anticancer agents (tamoxifen, imatinib, dasatinib, gefitinib,<br />

lapatinib). Although structurally and pharmacologically diverse, compounds<br />

which caused lysosomotropism had a CLogP value > 2 and a basic pKa value between<br />

6.5 to 11. In contrast, compounds which did not have this combination <strong>of</strong><br />

physicochemical properties were not lysosomotropic. <strong>The</strong> HCS assay that we developed<br />

is a robust and rapid method for investigating lysosomotropism and can be<br />

implemented within a screening paradigm for identifying drug-induced lysosomal<br />

dysfunction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!