27.07.2013 Views

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

The Toxicologist - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

those with high nickel content are significant activators <strong>of</strong> the inflammasome. <strong>The</strong><br />

proposed mechanism involves uptake <strong>of</strong> the particles into lysosomes followed by<br />

lysosomal rupture and release <strong>of</strong> cathepsin B. Active cathepsin B stimulates the assembly<br />

<strong>of</strong> the NLRP3 inflammasome. Furthermore, a shift in macrophages towards<br />

a distinct subset, potentially the Th2-associated alternatively activated phenotype,<br />

may play a role in determining if ENM induces fibrosis. Supported by NIH<br />

ES015497, ES018742, RR017670 and NSP CBET0834233.<br />

1712 MACROPHAGE DIVERSITY AND POLARIZATION IN<br />

IMMUNOPATHOLOGY.<br />

A. Mantovani. Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, University <strong>of</strong> Milan, Milan, Italy.<br />

Sponsor: D. Laskin.<br />

Plasticity is a hallmark <strong>of</strong> cells <strong>of</strong> the myelomonocytic lineage. Mononuclear phagocytes<br />

in response to innate recognition or to signals from lymphocytes undergo<br />

adaptive responses. Shaping <strong>of</strong> monocyte-macrophage function is a key component<br />

<strong>of</strong> resistance to pathogens, tissue damage and repair. Neutrophils have now revealed<br />

considerable plasticity, reminiscent <strong>of</strong> their macrophage ‘cousins’. Orchestration <strong>of</strong><br />

myelomonocytic cell function is a key element linking inflammation and cancer<br />

and provides a paradigm for macrophage plasticity and function. Better understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> the molecular basis <strong>of</strong> myelomonocytic cell plasticity opens new vistas<br />

in immunopathology and therapeutic intervention. Thus, different macrophage<br />

subsets, which differentially contribute to plaque infiltration and to atherosclerosis<br />

complications, have been identified. Similarly, depending on different environmental<br />

signals, plaque-associated macrophages can express polarized pro- and antiatherogenic<br />

programs by influencing lipid metabolism, inflammatory responses,<br />

and plaque stability. Thus, a “macrophage balance” plays a major role in the pathogenesis<br />

<strong>of</strong> atherosclerotic plaques and affects the evolution and complications <strong>of</strong><br />

atherosclerosis.<br />

1713 MECHANISMS OF MICROGLIAL ACTIVATION IN<br />

RESPONSE TO TOXICANTS.<br />

A. Gow. Pharmacology and <strong>Toxicology</strong>, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ. Sponsor:<br />

D. Laskin.<br />

Macrophages are known to adopt an activated phenotype when challenged with<br />

pathogens or toxicants. Up-regulation <strong>of</strong> inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is<br />

a fundamental characteristic <strong>of</strong> classically activated macrophages. However the biological<br />

targets <strong>of</strong> iNOS-derived nitric oxide (NO) have not been fully elucidated<br />

and hence the role <strong>of</strong> NO in the macrophage activation process unknown. We recently<br />

identified a number <strong>of</strong> NO-related mechanisms for controlling macrophage<br />

activation, particularly with regard to the resulting phenotpye, vis a vis classical<br />

(M1) and alternative (M2) activation. <strong>The</strong> pulmonary collectin, surfactant protein-<br />

D (SP-D), serves to regulate the macrophage phenotype in response to LPS. NOmediated<br />

modification <strong>of</strong> SP-D can alter this function to favor M1 or M2 depending<br />

upon its redox milieu. In this way iNOS-derived NO is both a regulator and<br />

potential product <strong>of</strong> activation. A key factor in this NO-mediated regulation is the<br />

redox state <strong>of</strong> the NO. Modification <strong>of</strong> SP-D by lower oxide NO leads to the generation<br />

<strong>of</strong> S-nitrosylated or SNO-SP-D, while higher oxides lead to cross-linked<br />

SP-D. SNO-SP-D favors M1 activation while cross-linked SP-D favors M2 activation.<br />

Monocyte-derived microglial cells in the brain also up-regulate iNOS expression<br />

in response to inflammatory activators, such as LPS. We found that NO-derived<br />

from iNOS is critical to the adoption <strong>of</strong> a M1 phenotype in microglial cells.<br />

Additionally, redox status appears to be key in this process. Redox active copper,<br />

(Copper I) inhibits the release <strong>of</strong> NO by LPS-treated microglial cells. This is independent<br />

<strong>of</strong> reduced iNOS expression or NF-κB activity. Immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence<br />

analysis macrophage activation markers have established that Copper (I) induces<br />

M2 type activation. As microglial activation is a critical step in neurodegeneration,<br />

these interactions may have implications for the role <strong>of</strong> environmental factors in<br />

aging-related neurological disease. Supported by NIH HL086621.<br />

1714 MACROPHAGE DIVERSITY PROMOTES TUMOR<br />

PROGRESSION AND METASTASIS.<br />

J. W. Pollard. Department <strong>of</strong> Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Medicine Yeshiva University, New York, NY. Sponsor: D. Laskin.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is persuasive clinical and experimental evidence that macrophages promote<br />

cancer initiation and malignant progression. During tumor initiation, they create<br />

an inflammatory environment that is mutagenic and promotes growth. As tumors<br />

progress to malignancy, macrophages stimulate angiogenesis, enhance tumor cell<br />

migration and invasion, and suppress antitumor immunity. At metastatic sites,<br />

macrophages prepare the target tissue for arrival <strong>of</strong> tumor cells, and then a different<br />

subpopulation <strong>of</strong> macrophages promotes tumor cell extravasation, survival, and<br />

subsequent growth. Specialized subpopulations <strong>of</strong> macrophages with distinct phenotypes<br />

may represent important new therapeutic targets. Supported by NIH grant<br />

CA131270.<br />

1715 WHEN IS EXPOSURE NOT EXPOSURE? DEFINING<br />

THE DOSE-RESPONSE REGION BETWEEN “EFFECT”<br />

AND “ADVERSE EFFECT” IMPLICATIONS FOR<br />

HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT.<br />

C. English. NSF International, Ann Arbor, MI.<br />

‘Omics technologies demonstrate global changes in gene regulation and expression<br />

following chemical exposure, causing toxicologists to revisit the question, what is an<br />

adverse effect and what isn’t. Dose-dependent transitions in genomic and related responses<br />

reflect the levels <strong>of</strong> exposure that cause detectable perturbations to the biological<br />

system under study. We will focus on two transitions, having both dose and<br />

temporal dimensions, which are advanced as being pivotal to understanding mode<br />

<strong>of</strong> action and prediction <strong>of</strong> toxicity. <strong>The</strong> first transition is from no-detectable-effect<br />

on the biological system relative to unexposed controls, to the first-perceptible-effect<br />

at the global genome level; observed as up- and down-regulation <strong>of</strong> genes that<br />

regulate adaptive responses. <strong>The</strong> second transition is from the adaptive response region<br />

to the first adverse response or critical effect region <strong>of</strong> the dose-response relationship.<br />

We will explore if and how ‘omic phenomena elicited by chemical exposures<br />

translate into useful information for risk assessors. Consideration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

adaptive capacity <strong>of</strong> the biological system and severity <strong>of</strong> the effect might further inform<br />

our definition <strong>of</strong> the term adverse and inform the magnitude <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

uncertainty factors used. Understanding dose-dependent transitions combined<br />

with dosimetry models that characterize the exposure-tissue concentration relationship<br />

might permit risk assessors to define exposures delimited by safe and adverse<br />

boundaries. We will conclude by describing emerging advances in high-throughput<br />

quantitative ‘omic technologies, and findings from studies with endogenous and<br />

exogenous compounds and nanoparticulates, to address how we move from the vast<br />

array <strong>of</strong> ‘omic data generated to practical risk assessment applications.<br />

1716 USE OF THE HIERARCHICAL OXIDATIVE STRESS<br />

PARADIGM FOR HAZARD AND RISK ASSESSMENT IN<br />

RESPONSE TO AMBIENT ULTRAFINE AND<br />

ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLE TOXICITY.<br />

A. E. Nel. Medicine, University <strong>of</strong> California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA. Sponsor:<br />

A. Nel.<br />

<strong>The</strong> hierarchical oxidative stress paradigm describes the cellular or tissue response<br />

to incremental levels <strong>of</strong> oxidative stress in response to pro-oxidative ambient ultrafine<br />

(UFP) and engineered nanoparticles (ENM). <strong>The</strong> paradigm is useful for elucidating<br />

dose-dependent oxidative stress outcomes in which the critical effect could<br />

manifest as Nrf2-mediated antioxidant defense or pro-inflammatory signal pathway<br />

responses that vary with the particle oxidant potential and the level <strong>of</strong> redox<br />

disequilibrium. Clinically, this could manifests as adaptive or pro-inflammatory responses<br />

in the lung that can be detected by oxidative stress biomarkers. I will discuss<br />

the utility <strong>of</strong> the hierarchical oxidative stress paradigm in in vitro and in vivo<br />

studies looking at UFP and nano-ZnO effects. I will show how conventional and<br />

rapid throughput in vitro cellular screening can be used to demonstrate the hierarchical<br />

oxidative stress response to these particles and how the cellular response relates<br />

to pulmonary inflammation in rodents. I will demonstrate that Nrf 2 knockout<br />

exacerbates airway inflammation and that changing <strong>of</strong> the dissolution<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> nano-ZnO can affect the exposure dose and the severity <strong>of</strong> lung<br />

inflammation. In summary, the critical effect to pro-oxidative nanoparticles could<br />

be a useful screening tool for hazard ranking and risk prevention.<br />

1717 HUMAN EXPOSURE CONTEXT FOR NANOPARTICLE<br />

TOXICITY ASSESSMENT BY BIOLOGICAL PATHWAY<br />

BASED DOSE-RESPONSE MODELING.<br />

J. G. Teeguarden 1 , M. N. Costa 2 , K. M. Waters 2 and J. E. McDermott 2 .<br />

1 Biological Monitoring and Modeling, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,<br />

Richland, WA and 2 Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Pacific Northwest<br />

National Laboratory, Richland, WA.<br />

Dose-response modeling <strong>of</strong> in vitro gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>iles hold great promise for<br />

differentiating between mechanisms <strong>of</strong> action and between low-dose adaptive effects<br />

and more serious higher-dose toxicity, i.e. critical effects driving toxicity and<br />

SOT 2011 ANNUAL MEETING 369

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!