Site selection and carrying capacity in Mediterranean ... - FAO Sipam
Site selection and carrying capacity in Mediterranean ... - FAO Sipam
Site selection and carrying capacity in Mediterranean ... - FAO Sipam
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
133 GFCM:XXXV/2011/Dma.9<br />
13. Aquaculture frameworks relate not only to enact<strong>in</strong>g legislation but also attend to the<br />
implementation at national, regional <strong>and</strong> local levels. In particular, efforts for <strong>capacity</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g<br />
should be made <strong>in</strong> those countries which plan to decentralize aquaculture competencies.<br />
14. Aquaculture has always suffered the ‘burden of proof’, show<strong>in</strong>g that its activities are not<br />
harmful for the environment. But the impact of other activities on aquaculture has been somehow<br />
neglected. Several states <strong>in</strong> the U.S. “have revised their water quality protection laws to<br />
specifically take <strong>in</strong>to account the environmental effects that state-run or state-permitted projects<br />
may have on areas that support aquaculture operations. As a consequence, proponents of a wide<br />
range of development projects must demonstrate that such projects will not significantly impact<br />
water quality for aquaculture operation (Duff et al. 2003).<br />
15. Some countries <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Mediterranean</strong> have developed examples of best practices for aquaculture<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g (e.g. Croatia - guidel<strong>in</strong>es for mar<strong>in</strong>e aquaculture plann<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>and</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g;<br />
<strong>and</strong> Sicily - L<strong>in</strong>ee guida per la realizzazione di impianti di maricoltura <strong>in</strong> Sicilia)<br />
Further steps can be taken for the development of methodological approaches to evaluate the impact of<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> aquaculture, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicators to measure the results of policies <strong>and</strong> plans <strong>in</strong> the medium<br />
<strong>and</strong> short term. Currently, we do not have tools to assess the impact of both policies <strong>and</strong> legal<br />
frameworks on the aquaculture development.<br />
Summaris<strong>in</strong>g, governments should <strong>in</strong>sist on:<br />
• Strength policy development through improved coord<strong>in</strong>ation among agencies.<br />
• Identification of a lead agency <strong>in</strong> each country or region to coord<strong>in</strong>ate aquaculture procedures,<br />
concepts, plans etc…<br />
• Interagency coord<strong>in</strong>ation is a critical element of effective policy plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />
implementation<br />
• Streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of the permitt<strong>in</strong>g process <strong>and</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g user-friendly guidel<strong>in</strong>es on:<br />
Which agencies need to be contacted<br />
Who to contact with<strong>in</strong> those agencies to help the permitt<strong>in</strong>g process.<br />
Adoption of best management practices<br />
• Include aquaculture as an strategic policy<br />
• Address the lack of <strong>in</strong>dicators to assess the impact of aquaculture plann<strong>in</strong>g on the activity<br />
(production, value, employment)<br />
133