Site selection and carrying capacity in Mediterranean ... - FAO Sipam

88 GFCM:XXXV/2011/Dma.9
The full range of welfare impacts have been considered: those that can be measured through market
activity and those that are derived outside the market; those that involve direct use such as the
production and consumption of fish and those that involve indirect use, such as the benefits from
amenity or intrinsic values. Many of these effects have yet to be quantified and, therefore, the
discussion concentrated on identifying issues of importance that should guide future research and
action. In some cases, especially in the case of governance and market development concrete action
has been ongoing and directions are relatively clear. In other cases, such as the management of
interactions between aquaculture and wild fish stocks, direction is less clear and would benefit from
increased discussion and research.
References
Abellan, E. and B. Basurco. (eds.) (1999) Marine Finfish Species Diversification: Current Situation
and Prospects in Mediterranean Aquaculture (Results of the Survey on Finfish Diversification
in the Mediterranean carried out within the framework of the CIHEAM Network on Technology
of Aquaculture in the Mediterranean (TECAM)), CIHEAM/FA0
Advanced Tuna Ranching Technologies (2009) The 2008 Bluefin Tuna Dossier: An Analysis of
Japan’s 2008 Fresh Ranched Bluefin Tuna Auction Markets vs ICCAT’s 2008 BFT Caging
Declarations. Madrid, Spain.
Angel, D.L., Eden, N., Breitstein, S., Yurman, A., Katz, T., and E. Spanier. (2002). In situ
biofiltration: a means to limit the dispersal of effluents from marine finfish cage aquaculture.
Hydrobiologia 469:1-10
Angel, D.L. and Freeman, S. (2009). Integrated aquaculture (INTAQ) as a tool for an ecosystem
approach to the marine farming sector in the Mediterranean Sea. In D. Soto (ed.). Integrated
marine aquaculture: a global review. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 529.
Rome, FAO, p. 133-183.
Barrington K., Chopin T. & Robinson, S. (in press). Integrated multitrophic aquaculture inmarine
temperate waters. In Soto D. (ed.). Integrated mariculture: a global review. FAO Fisheries and
Aquaculture Technical Paper. Rome, FAO.
Basurco, B. and Abellán, E. (1999). Finfish species diversification in the context of Mediterranean
marine fish farming development. Options Mediterranees 24: 9-25.
Becker, N. and Y. Horesh (2006) The Economic Value of Forests; The Biryah forest. Report to the
Israeli National Forest Service. (in Hebrew)
Ben Khemis, I., D. Zouiten, R. Besbes and F. Kamoun (2006) Larval Rearing an dWeaningof Thick
Lipped Grey Mullet (Chelon Labrosus) in Mesocosm with Semi-Extensive Technology.
Aquaculture. 259:1-4, pp. 190-201.
CAAR - Coastal Alliance for Aquaculture Reform (2008) Global Assessment of Closed System
Aquaculture. Report produced by the David Suzuki Foundation and Georgia Strait Alliance.
81pp
Cancemi, G., de Falco, G. and C. Pergent (2003) Effects of organic matter input from a fish farming
facility on a Posidonia oceanica meadow, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 56: 961–968.
Christofilogiannis, P. (2001) Codes of Practice in Southern Europe. Report of the MARAQUA
project. http://www.lifesciences.napier.ac.uk/maraqua/christo.htm
Delgado, O., Ruiz, J.M., Pérez, M., Romero, J., Ballesteros, E., 1999. Effects of fish farming on
seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) in a Mediterranean bay: seagrass decline after organic loading
cessation. Oceanol. Acta 22: 109–117.
Dempster, T, Sanchez-Jerez, P., Tuya, F., Fernandez-Jover, D., Bayle-Sempere, J., Boyra, A., and
Haroun, R. (2006). Coastal aquaculture and conservation can work together. Marine Ecology
Progress Series: 314: 309–310.
Dempster, T., Fernandez-Jover, D., Sanchez-Jerez, P., Tuya, Bayle-Sempere, Boyra, Haroun, R.,
(2005). Vertical variability of wild fish assemblages around sea cage fish faro: implications for
management. Marine Ecology Progress Series 304: 15-29.
88