05.08.2013 Views

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

ORNL-1816 - the Molten Salt Energy Technologies Web Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ANP QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT<br />

- 5<br />

4900<br />

v) 4800<br />

w<br />

a<br />

I- 3<br />

d t700<br />

W<br />

0<br />

B<br />

I- 4600<br />

W<br />

m<br />

I- 3<br />

-I<br />

I-<br />

T3<br />

0<br />

4500<br />

1400<br />

n<br />

z<br />

a<br />

5 4300<br />

5<br />

K<br />

0<br />

9<br />

K<br />

4200<br />

4100<br />

1000<br />

-<br />

<strong>ORNL</strong>-LR-DWG 3946<br />

404 100 96 92 88 84 80 76 72 68 64 60 56 52 48 44 40 36 32 28 24 20 16 12 8 4 0<br />

TIME (min)<br />

in about 8 min. However, by this time <strong>the</strong> reactor<br />

mean temperature was 138OoF, and it was <strong>the</strong>re-<br />

fore decreased (to 1350°F) by inserting <strong>the</strong> shim<br />

rods. The reactor was again brought from low<br />

power to high power in 2 min, and after 8 min at<br />

high power <strong>the</strong> shim rods were withdrawn to in-<br />

crease <strong>the</strong> mean temperature. It is most sig-<br />

nificant that during <strong>the</strong> 2-min interval required to<br />

bring <strong>the</strong> reactor from a nominal power of 100 kw<br />

to 2.5 Mw <strong>the</strong> shortest recorded pile period was<br />

only 14 sec. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, when at high power,<br />

group withdrawal of <strong>the</strong> shim rods (0.02% Ak/sec)<br />

resulted in a pile period of only 10 sec. These<br />

two limiting periods were consistently repro-<br />

ducible.<br />

Additional insight into <strong>the</strong> behavior of <strong>the</strong><br />

negative temperature coefficient is also afforded<br />

by Fig. 1.3. By time 84 min, <strong>the</strong> blower was off<br />

and <strong>the</strong> reactor power was reduced to about<br />

100 kw. The shim rods were <strong>the</strong>n inserted to<br />

make <strong>the</strong> reactor subcritical. At 86 min, <strong>the</strong> fuel<br />

helium blower was turned on. The higher density<br />

14<br />

Fig. 1.3. Power Excursions.<br />

cooled fuel made <strong>the</strong> reactor critical, and in 2 min<br />

a AT of about 200°F was obtained. At this time,<br />

however, <strong>the</strong> blower speed was automatically<br />

reduced by a low-temperature signal. The blowers<br />

were subsequently shut off and <strong>the</strong> shims inserted.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> reactor power level had been cali-<br />

'.<br />

brated against <strong>the</strong> activity count of a fuel sample,<br />

<strong>the</strong> actual reactor power remained in doubt through-<br />

out <strong>the</strong> experiment, not only because of uncertainty<br />

regarding <strong>the</strong> retention of fission products by <strong>the</strong><br />

fuel but also because of discrepancies in heat<br />

balances in <strong>the</strong> process systems, that is, heat<br />

removed from fuel and sodium vs heat picked up<br />

in <strong>the</strong>ir water heat dumps. While <strong>the</strong> causes of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se discrepancies are now being analyzed in 1 -<br />

detail, <strong>the</strong> most reliable estimate of <strong>the</strong> reactor F<br />

power is believed to be that obtained from <strong>the</strong><br />

temperature differences and flows in <strong>the</strong> fuel and<br />

sodium systems. During one typical period of<br />

power operation, <strong>the</strong> fuel AT of 370°F at 45 gpm<br />

accounted for more than 1.9 Mw in <strong>the</strong> fuel, while<br />

<strong>the</strong> sodium AT of 115°F at 150 gpm accounted<br />

- 7<br />

-<br />

0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!