15.08.2013 Views

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Trek served to legitimise this otherwise outdated and politically incorrect myth.<br />

Aliens can more easily be accommodated as the other within science fiction culture<br />

and concurrently help to reinvigorate these myths, while not having to conform to<br />

the particularities of the earth’s socio-political systems. Explicit threats to the<br />

earth’s fragile eco-systems as a consequence of alien life-forces remain a constant<br />

thematic preoccupation throughout the series’ history.<br />

The central experience of space travel in Star Trek is dramatised by encounters<br />

between humans and non-humans. This encounter (‘first contact’) is framed by a<br />

liberal egalitarian humanism, which sought to offset the imperialist polarisation<br />

between cultures as evidenced throughout the history of the West in particular.<br />

Driven by a form of countercultural utopianism, Gene Roddenberry, the creator of<br />

the series, invented the key philosophical and narrative device of the ‘Prime<br />

Directive’ because he wanted the (western) Federation to act as a corrective to the<br />

‘bloody history of (imperial) exploration’ (Richards 1997: 13). This Directive is<br />

considered to be the highest moral authority and is defined as the sacred right of<br />

every sentient species to live in accordance with its normal evolutionary pattern.<br />

This Prime Directive 13 can be contrasted with the more altruistic and less homocentric<br />

notion of an ‘Ecological Directive’.<br />

Yet according to Karin Blair, the original television series corresponds with the<br />

national disgust for the old ethics that demanded destruction of the evil alien in<br />

Vietnam and also left America without a viable concept of hero. Star Trek responds<br />

to the need for such an ideal; the character of Kirk overlaps with the dedicated man<br />

of action, the traditional ship’s captain, while at the same time adding something<br />

new. He is at home with his emotions . . . Within the Enterprise we have a new model<br />

for a human garden where work, knowledge and change contribute to the civilisation<br />

of human nature . . . the trajectory of the Enterprise is not towards destruction but<br />

creation, it is not a fall but a flight . . . the sought after garden is no longer ‘out there’<br />

in nature . . . but inside the human mind and its conscious construction. As Gene<br />

Roddenberry, the original creator of the series, asserts, we as travellers need . . . to<br />

fully experience the trip. We are all aliens and as such ‘are part of each other and of<br />

everything that is’<br />

(Roddenberry cited by Blair in Newcombe et al. 1982: 183-97).<br />

Roddenberry’s apparently egotistical evocation of the personal ‘trip’ is signalled in<br />

my reading of Contact but I would argue that Star Trek helped to move beyond this<br />

egotistical fixation by counterbalancing human agency with other forms of sentient<br />

beings. The protagonists in the original Star Trek series with its international cast<br />

and crew always appeared to assert their individuality (and humanity).<br />

Nevertheless, they also endorsed the implicit hierarchical power structure under<br />

4 Conspiracy Thrillers and Science Fiction 157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!