Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
166 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />
effectiveness of official government policy. As in Body Snatchers, individualised<br />
human agency remains impotent in the face of corporate/government power.<br />
The Andromeda Strain<br />
Whereas Endangered Species focuses on government conspiracies, The<br />
Andromeda Strain (1970) seeks to expose more universal fault lines within western<br />
technology, while connecting most explicitly back to 1950s B-movies and their<br />
preoccupation with all-pervasive viruses. Following the mantra inviting ecology<br />
activists to ‘think globally but act locally’, The Andromeda Strain connects many<br />
important arguments regarding the potential role of technology within a future<br />
eco-system.<br />
Conventionally, the primary paranoia of the text is the discovery of the connection<br />
between the ‘micro-thing’ from outer space and a secret bacteriological warfare<br />
project (also suggested in Endangered Species via an overweening and secretive<br />
intelligence agency), together with the pervasive dangers of global scientific<br />
research. The American defence forces are attempting to harness the powers of the<br />
‘ultimate weapon’, namely alien life forces.<br />
Directed by Robert Wise 27 who began his career as an editor on Citizen Kane, the<br />
film is based on a novel and screenplay by the prolific and often ecologically<br />
provocative author Michael Crichton, who went on to write Jurassic Park. The<br />
narrative begins with an aerial view of a small remote village in New Mexico with<br />
everyone appearing dead from a mysterious ‘virus’ 28 except for a drunken old man<br />
and a crying baby. As a scientific and military team becomes metaphorically and<br />
physically cleansed in preparation for an investigation of the virus within a secret<br />
underground research laboratory, the audience is treated to a technical display of<br />
scientific instrumentation and an evocative use of colour and architectural space<br />
within a carefully structured mise-en-scène, comparable to the clinical delights of<br />
Kubrick’s 2001. As the team examine the survivors from within their protective<br />
life-suits, and survey the alien life force from behind glass screens and banks of<br />
monitors, audiences are forced to confront the unseen ‘horror’. All the<br />
sophisticated technology mediating the alien’s otherness does not provide a<br />
language to decode its awesome strangeness. All the investigators are left with are<br />
humorous platitudes like ‘it’s getting bigger’, as they attempt to ‘test’ the<br />
molecules with their (un)sophisticated instrumentation.<br />
Unlike life on this planet, which is implicitly understood and apparently fully<br />
appreciated, alien life does not conform to (eco)logical patterns, particularly by<br />
leaving no waste of any type and surviving within apparently non-nurturing<br />
conditions. Like the Borg in Star Trek, its indescribable life force cannot be<br />
destroyed by ‘conventional force’ - a fact which greatly upsets the logical, ordered,