15.08.2013 Views

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Similarly, the two other characters on the expedition sent to find his girlfriend<br />

noticeably lack altruistic motives, much less endorse conventional heroic ones. One<br />

was in some environmental organisation but unhesitatingly admitted that his<br />

primary reason for working there was because 90 percent of the staff was female<br />

and monetary reward was now his guiding motivation. The third member of the<br />

conventionally ‘elite’ expeditionary force is represented as an uninspiring<br />

cameraman.<br />

The head of the hunting expedition (played by Pete Postlethwaite), however, is not<br />

interested in mercenary payment and only wants a crack at hunting the most<br />

famous ‘hunter’ in history - by the ‘second most famous hunter’, man. Like Ahab<br />

(as he is jokingly christened by others) or Quint in Jaws, he seeks the ultimate<br />

adversary, the great land-based leviathan. Only then can he achieve his destiny and<br />

affirm that he is truly ‘alive’, like all the great nature explorers. As suggested by<br />

Faden, these (anti) heroes believe that the human species needs to feel in control<br />

of nature, technology and their environment to feel fully alive, especially now that<br />

the Darwinian instinct to hunt for food has been all but abolished within the<br />

synthetic technological culture of western man.<br />

The documentary cameraman provides spot advertising for Nikon (like the ironic<br />

display of dino-merchandise in the Disney-like shop), as he captures images of the<br />

majestic dinosaurs. ‘The Pulitzer Prize is mine now,’ he gloats as the ‘money shots’<br />

are transfixed onto celluloid for spectatorial pleasure. But these high-tech<br />

communication and recording devices always appear to let the humans down, since<br />

several human agents unfortunately refuse to rely on natural instinct. As our<br />

benevolent and eager palaeontologist tries to observe and record the bonding<br />

rituals within the Rex family, an automatic rewind camera almost gets her killed<br />

when the ‘objectified’ (applying Susan Sontag’s seminal thesis on nature<br />

photography) dinosaurs misinterpret the sound of the camera as a threat to their<br />

existence. Malcolm pontificates, through the clearest piece of ‘scientific ecospeak’,<br />

how scientists cannot observe and research a native habitat without<br />

affecting it in some way. This perennial ethical dilemma for humans has already<br />

been discussed through films like Medicine Man and At Play in the Fields of the<br />

Lord, and will become central to a reading of ‘the Prime Directive’ of Star Trek in<br />

Chapter 4.<br />

The key motivating premise of the sequel, as with the original, is that all ecosystems<br />

are finely balanced and can easily be put out of synchronicity, even by the<br />

sound of a camera. While this benevolent and ecologically responsible intervention<br />

group merely wants to observe and scientifically analyse the island’s unique<br />

species, it is their altruistic intervention which finally causes the eco-system to<br />

become dangerously unbalanced and destabilised, rather than the more intrusive,<br />

2 Nature Film and Ecology 81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!