15.08.2013 Views

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />

films and concluding with recent commercially successful science fiction texts<br />

which explicitly focus on a range of global ecological fears.<br />

As a new millennium approached, many critics pointed out that globally inclusive<br />

myths became even more necessary, whereas others suggested that ‘the psychic<br />

and social structures in which we live, have become profoundly anti-ecological,<br />

unhealthy and destructive’. Consequently, there appears to be a need for ‘new<br />

forms, (re)emphasising our essential interconnectedness rather than our<br />

separateness, evoking the feeling of belonging to each other’ (Gablik 1991: 5).<br />

‘Man lives in a progressive, expressive, non-repetitive time; [whereas] ecology is<br />

the science of cyclical repetition’ (Gunter in Glotfelty 1996: 54). <strong>Hollywood</strong> mythic<br />

texts serve to connect these contrasting time frameworks. The British philosopher<br />

Kate Soper (Soper 1995) reiterates how even Marx recognised the civilising<br />

impulse implicit in mythic expression and its ‘escape’ from encrusted modes of<br />

rationalisation. The central problem for modern-day human agency remains how<br />

to avoid putting too much stress on the environment from an apparently<br />

unreconcilable desire for fulfilled individual lives.<br />

Soper concludes her polemic:<br />

Rather than becoming more awe-struck by nature, we need perhaps to become more<br />

stricken by the ways in which our dependency upon its resources involves us irredeemably<br />

in certain forms of detachment from it. To get ‘closer’ to nature, in a sense<br />

[is] to experience more anxiety about all those ways in which we cannot finally identify<br />

with it, not it with us. But in that very process, of course, we could also be transforming<br />

our sense of human identity<br />

(Soper 1995: 278).<br />

One of the ways of trying to understand this ethical relationship with nature has<br />

been through ecological frameworks and most notably through the application of<br />

the Gaia thesis.<br />

Gaia and Eco-ethics<br />

The Gaia thesis, like Aldo Leopold's seminal ‘land ethic’, affirms that the<br />

biosphere 8 together with its atmospheric environment forms a single entity or<br />

natural system. Gaia is regarded not only as an entity but a process which, like<br />

evolution, can be regarded as a goal directed one. Nature, therefore, is seen as<br />

neither ‘omniscient nor omnipotent’ (Goldsmith in Jencks 1992: 399-408) since<br />

life processes can go wrong, a scenario depicted in Jurassic Park, which will be<br />

discussed in detail in the following chapter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!