Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
30 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />
Philosophical theories of the value of nature most specifically address these light<br />
and dark gradations of ecology and help provide an effective starting point to<br />
position a reading of <strong>Hollywood</strong> films. These can be grouped into the following<br />
broad categories.<br />
a) Anthropocentrism. This position recognises nature primarily as a resource,<br />
which contributes to human value. This pervasive notion will be explored in detail,<br />
especially through the exposition of animism in the Spielberg oeuvre as providing<br />
a fruitful site of light eco-utopianism.<br />
Many ecological critics of anthropocentrism have argued that the dominant<br />
tendency in western culture (for instance Christianity) has been to construe<br />
difference in terms of hierarchy and that a less colonising approach to nature does<br />
not involve denying human reason or human difference but rather ceasing to treat<br />
reason as the basis of superiority and domination. An ecological ethic must,<br />
according to Val Plumwood, always be an ‘ethic of eco-justice that recognises the<br />
interconnection of social domination and the domination of nature’ (Plumwood<br />
1993: 20).<br />
However, the social ecologist Murray Bookchin asserts that the denial of hierarchy<br />
over nature results in a form of essentialism which accepts the denial of human<br />
distinctness and the rejection of ‘colonising forms of reason’, even the rejection of<br />
all rationality. He believes that current ecological crises are a direct result of the<br />
failure of human society to recognise and value the continuity, rather than the<br />
divisions, between nature and culture (cited in Gruen et al. 1994: 112). Bookchin<br />
affirms that human beings have a vital role to play as ‘ecological stewards’ in the<br />
evolutionary process, consciously engaged in the negotiated relationship between<br />
society and nature which is echoed in the other major philosophical theory of<br />
inherentism.<br />
b) Inherentism. This position recognises that the very concept of value is innately<br />
human. This philosophical notion appears to be at odds with deep ecology and so<br />
any attribution of such ecology to nature is dependent upon human consciousness<br />
and the constructions which that makes. Apparent contradictions within ecological<br />
values in general demand careful negotiation, especially warning against human<br />
complicity in eco-narratives which are often seen ‘not as liberating but as a call to<br />
caution’ (Campbell in Glotfelty 1996: 131). Consequently, a historical study of the<br />
evolution of these ecological precepts exposes the changing wishes, fears and<br />
desires of the human organism as part of a planetary eco-system.<br />
In this study human agency as depicted in <strong>Hollywood</strong> film will serve to illustrate<br />
how some of the ecological values promoted evolve more specifically from a holistic<br />
notion of nature itself rather than affirming a conventional belief in inherentism.