15.08.2013 Views

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />

Philosophical theories of the value of nature most specifically address these light<br />

and dark gradations of ecology and help provide an effective starting point to<br />

position a reading of <strong>Hollywood</strong> films. These can be grouped into the following<br />

broad categories.<br />

a) Anthropocentrism. This position recognises nature primarily as a resource,<br />

which contributes to human value. This pervasive notion will be explored in detail,<br />

especially through the exposition of animism in the Spielberg oeuvre as providing<br />

a fruitful site of light eco-utopianism.<br />

Many ecological critics of anthropocentrism have argued that the dominant<br />

tendency in western culture (for instance Christianity) has been to construe<br />

difference in terms of hierarchy and that a less colonising approach to nature does<br />

not involve denying human reason or human difference but rather ceasing to treat<br />

reason as the basis of superiority and domination. An ecological ethic must,<br />

according to Val Plumwood, always be an ‘ethic of eco-justice that recognises the<br />

interconnection of social domination and the domination of nature’ (Plumwood<br />

1993: 20).<br />

However, the social ecologist Murray Bookchin asserts that the denial of hierarchy<br />

over nature results in a form of essentialism which accepts the denial of human<br />

distinctness and the rejection of ‘colonising forms of reason’, even the rejection of<br />

all rationality. He believes that current ecological crises are a direct result of the<br />

failure of human society to recognise and value the continuity, rather than the<br />

divisions, between nature and culture (cited in Gruen et al. 1994: 112). Bookchin<br />

affirms that human beings have a vital role to play as ‘ecological stewards’ in the<br />

evolutionary process, consciously engaged in the negotiated relationship between<br />

society and nature which is echoed in the other major philosophical theory of<br />

inherentism.<br />

b) Inherentism. This position recognises that the very concept of value is innately<br />

human. This philosophical notion appears to be at odds with deep ecology and so<br />

any attribution of such ecology to nature is dependent upon human consciousness<br />

and the constructions which that makes. Apparent contradictions within ecological<br />

values in general demand careful negotiation, especially warning against human<br />

complicity in eco-narratives which are often seen ‘not as liberating but as a call to<br />

caution’ (Campbell in Glotfelty 1996: 131). Consequently, a historical study of the<br />

evolution of these ecological precepts exposes the changing wishes, fears and<br />

desires of the human organism as part of a planetary eco-system.<br />

In this study human agency as depicted in <strong>Hollywood</strong> film will serve to illustrate<br />

how some of the ecological values promoted evolve more specifically from a holistic<br />

notion of nature itself rather than affirming a conventional belief in inherentism.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!