15.08.2013 Views

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />

Nonetheless, such otherwise superficial ecological texts at least expose a range of<br />

utopic issues, even if they rarely create the screen space necessary to fully develop<br />

many of the implications of such a discourse.<br />

Because films like Medicine Man remain overtly didactic and outwardly ecological<br />

in their thematic concerns, they continue to work within existing socio-political<br />

systems rather than promote a more holistic and radically deeper form of ecological<br />

expression. Nevertheless, though the potent evocation of nature imagery may<br />

appear crude to ‘sophisticated’ viewers, it helps consolidate and dramatise inherent<br />

ecological and human conflicts. In Emerald Forest the (post)colonial clash of<br />

cultures is strongly visualised by the foregrounded image of a ‘naturalised’ Charlie<br />

climbing the outside of his father’s apartment block in his quest to save his people.<br />

The incongruity of his ascent, which is more usually associated with conquering a<br />

‘primitive’ natural obstacle, serves in this example to dramatise the clash of these<br />

mutually opposing cultures while also becoming metaphorically and visually<br />

resonant over and above the diegetic requirements of the text. Urban<br />

sophistication and architecture counterpoint the more primal and primitive beauty<br />

of the forest.<br />

Jerry Mander simplistically suggests that such sequences and films attempt to<br />

show white people from the point of view of natives. The native Americans call the<br />

whites ‘the termite people’ because of how they destroy the forest. As a<br />

consequence, white society conjures up the ‘dead world’ because of the concrete<br />

environment it creates where nothing grows (Mander 1992: 225). How to represent<br />

native indigenous peoples in <strong>Hollywood</strong> film is always problematic. If presented as<br />

radically different, with their ‘otherness’ fully articulated, scriptwriters often<br />

presume western mass audiences would not respond, much less understand.<br />

Consequently their representation becomes more uniformly like Walt Disney’s<br />

anthropomorphic ‘human’ animals and even caricatured as two-dimensional and<br />

thereby either appealing or repulsive to audiences. Hence they remain typecast as<br />

exotic and alien or idyllically innocent and primitive.<br />

This criticism can most readily be appreciated through the almost obligatory<br />

ritualised and idyllic scenes of native nubile bodies bathing and grooming, as<br />

evidenced in many western romantic paintings of nature. Old wrinkled bodies are<br />

rarely if ever displayed in films of ‘primitive’ societies, which are linked to the erotic<br />

evocation of easy and available sexuality through the promotion of exotic rites-ofpassage<br />

rituals. Fatimah Tobing Ront (1996) speaks of the ‘Rousseauesque study’<br />

of remaining ‘primitive peoples which have survived as a taxidermic mode of<br />

ethnographic cinema’ that began with Robert Flaherty’s Nanook of the North<br />

(1922). Yet in many of the films mentioned above, and especially in the extremely<br />

successful Dances with Wolves (1990), to be discussed in detail in the following<br />

chapter, concessions are made to the native culture’s unique, authentic language,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!