Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
60 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />
Nonetheless, such otherwise superficial ecological texts at least expose a range of<br />
utopic issues, even if they rarely create the screen space necessary to fully develop<br />
many of the implications of such a discourse.<br />
Because films like Medicine Man remain overtly didactic and outwardly ecological<br />
in their thematic concerns, they continue to work within existing socio-political<br />
systems rather than promote a more holistic and radically deeper form of ecological<br />
expression. Nevertheless, though the potent evocation of nature imagery may<br />
appear crude to ‘sophisticated’ viewers, it helps consolidate and dramatise inherent<br />
ecological and human conflicts. In Emerald Forest the (post)colonial clash of<br />
cultures is strongly visualised by the foregrounded image of a ‘naturalised’ Charlie<br />
climbing the outside of his father’s apartment block in his quest to save his people.<br />
The incongruity of his ascent, which is more usually associated with conquering a<br />
‘primitive’ natural obstacle, serves in this example to dramatise the clash of these<br />
mutually opposing cultures while also becoming metaphorically and visually<br />
resonant over and above the diegetic requirements of the text. Urban<br />
sophistication and architecture counterpoint the more primal and primitive beauty<br />
of the forest.<br />
Jerry Mander simplistically suggests that such sequences and films attempt to<br />
show white people from the point of view of natives. The native Americans call the<br />
whites ‘the termite people’ because of how they destroy the forest. As a<br />
consequence, white society conjures up the ‘dead world’ because of the concrete<br />
environment it creates where nothing grows (Mander 1992: 225). How to represent<br />
native indigenous peoples in <strong>Hollywood</strong> film is always problematic. If presented as<br />
radically different, with their ‘otherness’ fully articulated, scriptwriters often<br />
presume western mass audiences would not respond, much less understand.<br />
Consequently their representation becomes more uniformly like Walt Disney’s<br />
anthropomorphic ‘human’ animals and even caricatured as two-dimensional and<br />
thereby either appealing or repulsive to audiences. Hence they remain typecast as<br />
exotic and alien or idyllically innocent and primitive.<br />
This criticism can most readily be appreciated through the almost obligatory<br />
ritualised and idyllic scenes of native nubile bodies bathing and grooming, as<br />
evidenced in many western romantic paintings of nature. Old wrinkled bodies are<br />
rarely if ever displayed in films of ‘primitive’ societies, which are linked to the erotic<br />
evocation of easy and available sexuality through the promotion of exotic rites-ofpassage<br />
rituals. Fatimah Tobing Ront (1996) speaks of the ‘Rousseauesque study’<br />
of remaining ‘primitive peoples which have survived as a taxidermic mode of<br />
ethnographic cinema’ that began with Robert Flaherty’s Nanook of the North<br />
(1922). Yet in many of the films mentioned above, and especially in the extremely<br />
successful Dances with Wolves (1990), to be discussed in detail in the following<br />
chapter, concessions are made to the native culture’s unique, authentic language,