15.08.2013 Views

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />

imperialist force of hunters who couldn’t care less for the niceties of ecological<br />

balance and harmony.<br />

Two contrasting mise-en-scènes illustrate this collision of agencies and their<br />

accompanying effect on the eco-system. The first is almost a critique, even a<br />

parody, of the hunt sequence in Dances with Wolves explored in the following<br />

chapter. Our heroes’ and hence the audiences’ focus for identification (using<br />

classic narrative conventional analysis of ‘shot, reverse shot and opposing looks’)<br />

are positioned in hiding on the top of a hill overlooking a long grass valley.<br />

Iconographically they are positioned like native Americans observing the<br />

‘unnatural’ cowboys traversing the plain. Both stalked and exoticised, the dinosaurs<br />

in this instance extend their control and mark on the landscape as the hunt begins<br />

with the counter-invasion force. But instead of remaining distanced from the hunt,<br />

the spectators/audience becomes vicariously invited to join in the pleasure of the<br />

‘ultimate hunt’ of an extinct range of dinosaur species. The camera swoops, dollies<br />

and tracks, matching the eye-line of the attackers, unlike the more individualised<br />

sublime excess first encountered in the original, when unadulterated awe and pure<br />

spectacle dominated the mise-en-scène.<br />

The human hunters fulfil what is regarded as an innate hunter ritual, validating a<br />

hierarchical power structure with man at the top of the food chain and exhibited<br />

throughout hundreds of generations and cultures. But in contrast to Dances with<br />

Wolves, their hunt loses its mythic, symbolic and, most importantly, ethical<br />

validation, since the hunting and subsequent entrapment is solely executed for<br />

secular pleasure, serving no ‘life giving’ scientific purpose. The modus operandi of<br />

the original King Kong myth can no longer be sustained or, more importantly,<br />

legitimated within a post-colonial, ecologically sensitive late twentieth century<br />

western culture. Spielberg positions himself and the audience with his normative<br />

critical observers, who both metaphorically and literally maintain the high moral<br />

ground, serving both to critique the hunt while at the same time validating, if not<br />

legitimating, this form of kinetic excitement.<br />

The cries of the otherwise long extinct creatures as they are unceremoniously<br />

captured is counterpointed and contrasted with the later reversal of this hunting<br />

motif. In the original, the opening horrific pre-sequel features a heavily fortified<br />

caged dinosaur with the audience only able to see a close-up of an eye and to hear<br />

angry animal sounds. The violent reality of hunters becoming victims is most<br />

cogently illustrated when the chief hunter is outwitted by the superior raptors and<br />

provides a foreshadowing of what is to follow.<br />

Romney draws further correlations with the Vietnam war and how ‘one hunter<br />

instinctively shoots a small dinosaur to provide it with a rationale, a blood lust, to<br />

learn to fear man (read American)’ (Romney 1998: 24). There is in some ways a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!