Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
82 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />
imperialist force of hunters who couldn’t care less for the niceties of ecological<br />
balance and harmony.<br />
Two contrasting mise-en-scènes illustrate this collision of agencies and their<br />
accompanying effect on the eco-system. The first is almost a critique, even a<br />
parody, of the hunt sequence in Dances with Wolves explored in the following<br />
chapter. Our heroes’ and hence the audiences’ focus for identification (using<br />
classic narrative conventional analysis of ‘shot, reverse shot and opposing looks’)<br />
are positioned in hiding on the top of a hill overlooking a long grass valley.<br />
Iconographically they are positioned like native Americans observing the<br />
‘unnatural’ cowboys traversing the plain. Both stalked and exoticised, the dinosaurs<br />
in this instance extend their control and mark on the landscape as the hunt begins<br />
with the counter-invasion force. But instead of remaining distanced from the hunt,<br />
the spectators/audience becomes vicariously invited to join in the pleasure of the<br />
‘ultimate hunt’ of an extinct range of dinosaur species. The camera swoops, dollies<br />
and tracks, matching the eye-line of the attackers, unlike the more individualised<br />
sublime excess first encountered in the original, when unadulterated awe and pure<br />
spectacle dominated the mise-en-scène.<br />
The human hunters fulfil what is regarded as an innate hunter ritual, validating a<br />
hierarchical power structure with man at the top of the food chain and exhibited<br />
throughout hundreds of generations and cultures. But in contrast to Dances with<br />
Wolves, their hunt loses its mythic, symbolic and, most importantly, ethical<br />
validation, since the hunting and subsequent entrapment is solely executed for<br />
secular pleasure, serving no ‘life giving’ scientific purpose. The modus operandi of<br />
the original King Kong myth can no longer be sustained or, more importantly,<br />
legitimated within a post-colonial, ecologically sensitive late twentieth century<br />
western culture. Spielberg positions himself and the audience with his normative<br />
critical observers, who both metaphorically and literally maintain the high moral<br />
ground, serving both to critique the hunt while at the same time validating, if not<br />
legitimating, this form of kinetic excitement.<br />
The cries of the otherwise long extinct creatures as they are unceremoniously<br />
captured is counterpointed and contrasted with the later reversal of this hunting<br />
motif. In the original, the opening horrific pre-sequel features a heavily fortified<br />
caged dinosaur with the audience only able to see a close-up of an eye and to hear<br />
angry animal sounds. The violent reality of hunters becoming victims is most<br />
cogently illustrated when the chief hunter is outwitted by the superior raptors and<br />
provides a foreshadowing of what is to follow.<br />
Romney draws further correlations with the Vietnam war and how ‘one hunter<br />
instinctively shoots a small dinosaur to provide it with a rationale, a blood lust, to<br />
learn to fear man (read American)’ (Romney 1998: 24). There is in some ways a