Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
24 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />
justly claim to provide their audiences with approximate conceptualizations of<br />
hopes of escape’ (Coates 1994: 6).<br />
Jameson, while at first appearing to believe in utopian ideals, moved towards a more<br />
pessimistic position which reaffirmed the commodification of late capitalism. In<br />
particular he suggested that this had moved into the last two available domains,<br />
‘the unconscious (pornography, psychotherapy, fantasy) and nature (wilderness,<br />
parks, zoos and anthropology)’ (cited in Ellman 1992: 6). This apparent ‘total’<br />
commodification of nature will be strongly contested in this study.<br />
Less pessimistic critics assert, however, that the American brand of utopia evokes<br />
a more pragmatic present quest which rests on an ‘ingrained belief in the value of<br />
equality’ and the ‘perfectibility of man’ (Rooney 1985: 174). In this context the<br />
suggestion of Richard Dyer remains enticing:<br />
Faced with the cynicism of liberal culture and the widespread refusal of contemporary<br />
left culture to imagine the future, we would do well to look at the utopian<br />
impulse, however and whenever it occurs in popular culture<br />
(Dyer et al. 1981: 16).<br />
Dyer provocatively but also convincingly argues that the appeal of all forms of<br />
popular entertainment and culture generally lies in the way they offer ‘utopian<br />
solutions to real needs’ and ‘social longings created by capitalist society, providing<br />
images of abundance, energy, and community to counter actual problems of<br />
scarcity, exhaustion and fragmentation’ (Dyer in Harrison et al. 1984: 96).<br />
<strong>Utopia</strong>n Space<br />
David Harvey asserts that all classic utopias propose a fixed spatial order that<br />
ensures social stability by destroying the possibility of history and containing all<br />
processes within a fixed spatial frame. Jameson also speaks of the evolution of (eco-<br />
)spatial utopias from the 1960s ‘in which the transformation of social relations and<br />
political institutions is projected onto the vision of place and landscape, including<br />
the human body’ (Jameson 1991: 160). This notion of continuous change as<br />
preferable to a finished utopia, which would inevitably only be utopic for some, has<br />
influenced much progressive utopian thinking and can be seen most clearly in the<br />
exploration of counter-cultural agency as evidenced within road movies.<br />
Harvey goes so far as to argue that a utopianism ‘of pure process’ as he describes<br />
it, ‘can liberate the human spirit into a dematerialized world’, a virtual reality. He<br />
continues by enigmatically affirming that ‘becoming without being is empty<br />
idealism while being without becoming is death’ (Harvey 1996: 438). Such