Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
160 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />
idea that without community and citizenship 22 there is no liberation, only the most<br />
vulnerable and temporal armistice between an individual and oppression. The<br />
often apparent communion between human and alien culture is reminiscent of the<br />
communitarian philosophy which affords a necessary bulwark to the selfish<br />
individualism underscored by the mythic American dream that over-determines<br />
hierarchical individualism at the expense of a form of symbiotic egalitarianism.<br />
This dualistic model amounts to the demand to ‘be like me or disappear’ (Haber<br />
1994: 126). This tension between individualism and community remains ever<br />
present, if often buried and unresolved in the later series, especially through<br />
narrative closure. But, as Honi Fern Haber persuasively affirms, ‘[C]ommunity<br />
must not mean a shedding of our difference, nor the pathetic pretence that these<br />
differences do not exist’ (ibid.: 113). This paradox becomes most pronounced and<br />
often contradictory in encounters with ‘Body Snatcher type organisms’ called the<br />
Borg.<br />
More recent episodes and film spin-offs serve to dramatise a range of permutations<br />
implicit within ecological strategies of self-determination, evolving from<br />
individualist to totalitarian systems and which address in often diametrically<br />
opposed ways the primary ecological directive of organic survival, played out within<br />
a range of ‘exotic’ habitats. Like the ‘Body Snatchers’, the Borg also promise a<br />
‘better quality of life’ but demand in return the sacrifice of individuality and<br />
emotion, like any totalitarian regime. They promise ‘optimisation through effective<br />
use of component parts, rather than perfection of individuals through an improved<br />
understanding of the transcendent ideal of human nature’. The Borg finally<br />
threatens the ‘annihilation of difference through assimilation’ (Harrison et al.<br />
1996: 108) and embodies the antithesis of the Prime Directive, which is too big a<br />
price to pay even for the most fundamentalist, deep ecologists.<br />
Star Trek: The Next Generation prophesied an end to the Cold War by declaring<br />
peace between Klingon and human cultures, and offered the cyborg organism, as<br />
opposed to the ‘Body Snatchers’ prototype, as a more progressive model of human<br />
subjectivity. While the original series also foregrounded non-humans like Spock,<br />
nonetheless their otherness was framed as only an exaggerated aspect of human<br />
psychology. Spock’s dominant (Vulcan) rationality and logicality had to be<br />
tempered with human frailty to become fully acceptable and functional. This helps<br />
to offset Bernardi’s reading of a racist agenda beneath the stereotyping, since what<br />
the othered characters embody is often a powerful antidote to the apparently<br />
hegemonic (white) consensus and agency.<br />
The new Borg enemy reflects an even more advanced form of ecological organism,<br />
which uses all life forms in its endless quest for continuous adaptability and<br />
evolution. Unlike the libertarian notion of citizenship and individuality espoused in<br />
earlier series, the Borg symbolically embodies a coherent macro system and its