Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
Hollywood Utopia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
186 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />
even utopian, constructions of what has coalesced into the postmodernist<br />
aesthetic.<br />
Metaphorically, the cyborg embraces the fractured identity of the postmodern<br />
world. In many ways it also symbolises and articulates the post-gender politics of<br />
ecological consciousness, while also serving to promote a powerful humane<br />
expression of eco-responsible agency. The dangers, however, of such metaphoric<br />
essentialising concerning varying ontological notions embodying ‘human’ and<br />
‘post-human’ ecological agency, must remain foregrounded as a cautionary subtext.<br />
Legacy of 1950s Science Fiction<br />
Modernity helped to legitimise the theoretical foundations of the Enlightenment,<br />
‘whose outlook, goals and predisposition characterize the modern world’ (Berman<br />
1994: viii). It has hitherto been defined by two central, apparently opposing<br />
affirmations which contend that nature must be (totally) dominated as a means to<br />
human ends and that human ends can be reconciled with each other and nature<br />
through a mutual recognition of free and equal subjects. Such a simplistic, even<br />
naive, agenda can be seen as incorporating the total control of nature and has<br />
augmented a profusion of commodities that attempt to simulate or fulfil human<br />
‘desires’ without always understanding, much less exploring, human ‘needs’. The<br />
postmodernist aesthetic often actively seeks to engage with this dilemma, one with<br />
which ecology has always been preoccupied.<br />
1950s science fiction films dealt with ecological fears most explicitly by exploring<br />
the potential effects of nuclear destruction together with environmental<br />
degradation. 1 With the transformation of science fiction films in the 1980s, the<br />
mood had changed, many claim, towards the presentation of a much more complex,<br />
pessimistic and nihilistic vision of the future. Human nature itself was no longer<br />
accepted as consensual, a fixed entity (as in Body Snatchers), which had to be<br />
defended by right-minded individuals to protect its sacredness. In this new postnuclear<br />
world, good and bad, machine and human, often could no longer be easily<br />
distinguished. Brian McHale correctly regards such science fiction with its ‘relative<br />
openness to intertextual circulation’ as the most valuable model for a<br />
postmodernist consciousness (McHale 1992: 12). In fact, as E. Ann Kaplan says, it<br />
is this ‘blurring of opposition between human and machine, self and other, body<br />
and world, like the blurring of distinctions between plot and mise-en-scène, which<br />
is what makes postmodern science fiction texts so fascinating for cultural critics<br />
especially’ (Kaplan et al. 1990: 100).<br />
This chapter will illustrate how in many of these ostensibly dystopic texts the<br />
cyborgs/machines often manifest more effective, even redemptive, attributes than<br />
their erstwhile human role models. They also, I suggest, (re)present post-human