15.08.2013 Views

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

Hollywood Utopia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

186 <strong>Hollywood</strong> <strong>Utopia</strong><br />

even utopian, constructions of what has coalesced into the postmodernist<br />

aesthetic.<br />

Metaphorically, the cyborg embraces the fractured identity of the postmodern<br />

world. In many ways it also symbolises and articulates the post-gender politics of<br />

ecological consciousness, while also serving to promote a powerful humane<br />

expression of eco-responsible agency. The dangers, however, of such metaphoric<br />

essentialising concerning varying ontological notions embodying ‘human’ and<br />

‘post-human’ ecological agency, must remain foregrounded as a cautionary subtext.<br />

Legacy of 1950s Science Fiction<br />

Modernity helped to legitimise the theoretical foundations of the Enlightenment,<br />

‘whose outlook, goals and predisposition characterize the modern world’ (Berman<br />

1994: viii). It has hitherto been defined by two central, apparently opposing<br />

affirmations which contend that nature must be (totally) dominated as a means to<br />

human ends and that human ends can be reconciled with each other and nature<br />

through a mutual recognition of free and equal subjects. Such a simplistic, even<br />

naive, agenda can be seen as incorporating the total control of nature and has<br />

augmented a profusion of commodities that attempt to simulate or fulfil human<br />

‘desires’ without always understanding, much less exploring, human ‘needs’. The<br />

postmodernist aesthetic often actively seeks to engage with this dilemma, one with<br />

which ecology has always been preoccupied.<br />

1950s science fiction films dealt with ecological fears most explicitly by exploring<br />

the potential effects of nuclear destruction together with environmental<br />

degradation. 1 With the transformation of science fiction films in the 1980s, the<br />

mood had changed, many claim, towards the presentation of a much more complex,<br />

pessimistic and nihilistic vision of the future. Human nature itself was no longer<br />

accepted as consensual, a fixed entity (as in Body Snatchers), which had to be<br />

defended by right-minded individuals to protect its sacredness. In this new postnuclear<br />

world, good and bad, machine and human, often could no longer be easily<br />

distinguished. Brian McHale correctly regards such science fiction with its ‘relative<br />

openness to intertextual circulation’ as the most valuable model for a<br />

postmodernist consciousness (McHale 1992: 12). In fact, as E. Ann Kaplan says, it<br />

is this ‘blurring of opposition between human and machine, self and other, body<br />

and world, like the blurring of distinctions between plot and mise-en-scène, which<br />

is what makes postmodern science fiction texts so fascinating for cultural critics<br />

especially’ (Kaplan et al. 1990: 100).<br />

This chapter will illustrate how in many of these ostensibly dystopic texts the<br />

cyborgs/machines often manifest more effective, even redemptive, attributes than<br />

their erstwhile human role models. They also, I suggest, (re)present post-human

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!