dry anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and digestate ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Elango, D., Pulikesi, M., Baskaralingam, P., Ramamurthi, V. and Sivanesan, S. (2007). Production of biogas from municipal solid waste with domestic sewage. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 141, 301-304. Elert, G. (2003). Power consumption of a home. Retrieved September, 11 2012 from http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/BoiLu.shtml. El-Hadj, B., Astals, S., Galí, A., Mace, S. and Mata-Áivarez, J. (2009). Ammonia influence in anaerobic digestion of OFMSW. Water Science and Technology, 59 (6) , 1153-1158. Eliyan, C. (2007). Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in thermophilic ontinuous operation. (Masters Thesis No. EV-07-6, Asian Institute of Technology, 2007). Pathumthani: Asian Institute of Technology. Eskicioglu, C., Kennedy, K. J., Marin, J. and Strehler, B. (2011). Anaerobic digestion of whole stillage from dry-grind corn ethanol plant under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Bioresource Technology,102 (2), 1079-1086. Evans, G. (2001). Biowaste and biological waste treatment. The Cromwell press. ISBN: 1- 902916-08-5. Fdéz.-Güelfo, L. A., Álvarez-Gallego, C., Sales Márquez, D. and Romero García, L. I. (2010). Start-up of thermophilic-dry anaerobic digestion of OFMSW using adapted modified SEBAC inoculum. Bioresource Technology, 101 (23), 9031-9039. Fernández, J., Pérez, M. and Romero, L. I. (2008). Effect of substrate concentration on dry mesophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Bioresource Technology, 99 (14), 6075-6080. Fernández Rodríguez, J., Pérez, M. and Romero, L. I. (2012). Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Optimisation of the semicontinuous process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 193-194, 10-15. Forster-Carneiro, T. (2009). Anaerobic digestion or biomethanization: dry and thermophilic conditions. SciTopics. Retrieved February 27, 2012, from http://www.scitopics.com/ANAEROBIC_DIGESTION_OR_BIOMETHANIZATIO N_DRY_AND_THERMOPHILIC_CONDITIONS.html. Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M. and Romero, L. I. (2008). Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes: Dry thermophilic performance. Bioresource Technology, 99 (17), 8180- 8184. Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M. and Romero, L. I. (2008). Influence of total solid and inoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors treating food waste. Bioresource Technology, 99 (15), 6994-7002. Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M. and Romero, L.I. (2008). Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology, 99, 6763-6770. 98
Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M., Romero, L. I. and Sales, D. (2007). Dry -thermophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of the municipal solid waste: Focusing on the inoculum sources. Bioresource Technology, 98 (17), 3195-3203. Fricke, K., Santen, H., Wallmann, R., Huttner, A., and Dichtl, N. (2007). Operating problems in anaerobic digestion plants from nitrogen in MSW. Waste Management, 27, 30-43. Fuchs, J.G., Baier, U., Berner, A., Mayer, J. and Schleiss, K. (2008). Effects of digestate on the environment and on plant production - results of a research project, In Proceedings of ECN/ORBIT e.V. Workshop 2008 The future for Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Waste in Europe, Weimar, Germany. Gallert, C. and Winter, J., (1997). Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic wastes: effect of ammonia on glucose degradation and methane production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 48, 405–410. Gautam, S.P., Bundela, P.S., Pandey, A.K. Awasthi, M.K. and Sarsaiya, S. (2010). Composting of municipal solid waste of Jabalpur city. Global Journal of Environmental Research, 4 (1), 43-46. Gioelli, F., Dinuccio, E. and Balsari, P. (2011). Residual biogas potential from the storage tanks of non-separated digestate and digested liquid fraction, Bioresource Technology, 102 (22), 10248-10251. Gomez, X., Cuetos, M.J., Garcıa, A.I. and Moran, A. (2007). An evaluation of stability by thermogravimetric analysis of digestate obtained from different biowastes, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 149, 97–105. Guendouz, J., Buffière, P., Cacho, J., Carrère, M. and Delgenes, J. (2010). Dry anaerobic digestion in batch mode: Design and operation of a laboratory-scale, completely mixed reactor. Waste Management, 30 (10), 1768-1771. Hamzawi, N., Kennedy, K.J. and McLean D.D. (1999). Review of applications of highsolids anaerobic digestion to solid waste management, Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 26 (3), 119–132. Hansen, K.H., Angelidaki, I. and Ahring, B.K. (1998). Anaerobic digestion of swine manure inhibition by ammonia. Water Research, 32 (1), 5-12. Hartmann, H. and Ahring, B.K. (2005). A novel process configuration for anaerobic digestion of source-sorted household waste using hyper-thermophilic posttreatment. Biotechnology and Bioenergy, 90, 830–837. Hartmann, H. and Ahring, B.K. (2006). Strategies for the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: an overview. Water Science and Technology 53, 7–22. Heerenklage, J. and Stegmann, R. (2005). Analytical methods for the determination of the biological stability of waste samples, In Proceedings Sardinia 2005, Tenth 99
Page 1 and 2:
DRY ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPA
Page 3 and 4:
Abstract Global solid waste generat
Page 5 and 6:
2.9 Characteristics of Digestates 3
Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables Table Title Page 2.1
Page 9 and 10:
4.20 Layout of conceptual decentral
Page 11 and 12:
1.1 Background Chapter 1 Introducti
Page 13 and 14:
The specific objectives of this res
Page 15 and 16:
scale plants of the two processes i
Page 17 and 18:
acetogens play their part to run th
Page 19 and 20:
In dry anaerobic digestion, recycli
Page 21 and 22:
process is inhibited and at that po
Page 23 and 24:
eported, which increased with time,
Page 25 and 26:
acids and increased downfall of pat
Page 27 and 28:
performance of a poorly mixed (1 rp
Page 29 and 30:
conventional low-solid system at th
Page 31 and 32:
supply of the nutrients missing in
Page 33 and 34:
2.6.2 Single-stage continuous syste
Page 35 and 36:
single stage systems are DRANCO, Va
Page 37 and 38:
of the solid content around 23% TS
Page 39 and 40:
Substrate Feed TS (%) Reactor Type
Page 41 and 42:
Second is that it has a high water
Page 43 and 44:
2.9 Characteristics of Digestates D
Page 45 and 46:
For instance, Mumme et al., (2010)
Page 47 and 48:
Comparison of liquid and solid dige
Page 49 and 50:
2.10 Management Aspects of Anaerobi
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2.11 Changing parameters dur
Page 53 and 54:
amount of anaerobic fermentation re
Page 55 and 56:
3.1 Inoculum and Simulations of Was
Page 57 and 58: ed pump, water circulating jacket,
Page 59 and 60: the reactor was increased from 35°
Page 61 and 62: parts (wt/wt bas is) of digestate c
Page 63 and 64: Sand drying bed (SDB) is simple, ea
Page 65 and 66: 3.4.4 Estimation of GHG emissions i
Page 67 and 68: d) Calculation methods i) CH4 emiss
Page 69 and 70: Table 3.5 Analytical Methods for Va
Page 71 and 72: Biogas production 100X (NmL) Specif
Page 73 and 74: (i.e. 5.2 and 3.04 respectively, pl
Page 75 and 76: getting affected with the presence
Page 77 and 78: feedstock 2 is considered as a sudd
Page 79 and 80: 8.0) at most of the above said time
Page 81 and 82: Table 4.2 Surplus Energy of ITDAR D
Page 83 and 84: VFA 100 X (mg/L) VFA/Alk ratio 200
Page 85 and 86: the VFA concentration increased to
Page 87 and 88: The increase in GPR was almost line
Page 89 and 90: Based on our results, the best oper
Page 91 and 92: Based on this property of digestate
Page 93 and 94: Table 4.5. With curing of digestate
Page 95 and 96: application (after curing) in CH 4
Page 97 and 98: digestion, etc. Moreover, mixing of
Page 99 and 100: Figure 4.20 Layout of conceptual de
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommend
Page 103 and 104: 5.2 Recommendations Following are t
Page 105 and 106: References Abdullahi, Y. A., Akunna
Page 107: Cengel, Y.A. (2003). Heat Transfer
Page 111 and 112: Kaparaju, P., Buendia, I., Ellegaar
Page 113 and 114: Liu, C., Yuan, X., Zeng, G., Li, W.
Page 115 and 116: Paavola, T. and Rintala, J. (2008).
Page 117 and 118: Stroot, P. G., McMahon, K. D., Mack
Page 119 and 120: Zeshan, Karthikeyan, O. P. and Visv
Page 121 and 122: Fruit and vegetable Waste Closer to
Page 123 and 124: Figure A-5 Sand drying bed for dewa
Page 125 and 126: Assumptions Size of the community:
Page 127 and 128: The flow rate of 0.569 m 3 biogas/h
Page 129 and 130: Area for 910 kg dry solids = 910 (k
Page 131 and 132: = 280 m 3 /d x 0.000717 tons/m 3 (D
Page 133 and 134: Table C-1 Operational Parameters of
Page 135 and 136: Run Time GPR % CO2 % CH4 Methane Yi
Page 137 and 138: Appendix D Data of Phase II Pilot E
Page 139 and 140: Table D-3 Characteristics of Feed a
Page 141 and 142: Methodology Methodology for for Ene
Page 143 and 144: Q = Heat transfer rate or heat loss
Page 145: Calculation of GHG Emission Potenti
show all

dry anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and digestate ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?